Zooplankton abundance, vertical and horizontal distribution, and population structure were assessed using a 1 m2 Multiple Opening and Closing Nets and Environmental Sampling System (MOCNESS) with nine nets having 333um mesh and environmental sensors of temperature, salinity, and depth. The entire water column was sampled on the downcast using net # 0, which was not analyzed. The upper water column was typically sampled using nets 1 and 2 from 500 m to 200 m at 150 m depth intervals, nets 3 and 4 from 200 m to 100 m at 50 m depth intervals, and nets 5 to 8 from 100 m to the surface at 25 m depth intervals. Some tows were deployed down to 1000 m, and some tows were towed targeting krill swarms at irregular depths. Approximate locations of process study stations are shown in Fig. 1. More precise locations of the casts in Fig. 2.
\n
![\"\"](\"https://datadocs.bco-dmo.org/static/globec.whoi.edu/images/image002kdaly.gif\")
\n
Fig. 1. Approximate locations of process cruise stations in Marguerite Bay during austral autumn 2001 and 2002.
\n
![\"MOCNESS](\"https://datadocs.bco-dmo.org/static/globec.whoi.edu/images/MOC_station_map_LMG.png\")
\n
Fig. 2. Locations of MOCNESS stations for LMGould-0104 (2001) and LMGould-0203 (2002) cruises. Numbers correspond to the cast number.
Zooplankton Abundance Based on Taxa and Life Stages or Size Collected during the Process Cruises, Austral Autumn 2001 and 2002
\n
Data Contributed By:
\nKendra L. Daly
\nCollege of Marine Science
\nUniversity of South Florida
\n140 Seventh Ave. S.
\nSt. Petersburg, FL 33701
\nPhone: 727-553-1041
\nE-Mail: kdaly@marine.usf.edu
\n
Net sample collections by: Meng Zhou, Yiwu Zhu, Ryan Dorland, Dan Mertes, and Joe Smith
\nSample Analyses by: Jason Zimmerman, Alexander Timonin, Tatjana Semenova
Zooplankton samples were immediately preserved in 10% buffered formalin solution. All the large organisms (>15 mm) in the sample were removed and identified to taxa. The sample was then split to about 100 individuals of euphausiids. All euphausiids in the split were identified to species and life history stage and measured for length to the nearest 0.5 mm for larvae and to the nearest 1.0 mm for juvenile and adults. Next the sample was split to about 100 individuals of copepods. Copepods were identified to species and life history stage (female, male, copepodite V, or other copepodite). All other zooplankton in the split were identified to taxa and counted. For the Euchaetidae, we followed the designation of Park (1994) who ascribed the Antarctic species to the genus Paraeuchaeta. This data object (\"krill\") reports the abundance of each euphausiid species by life stage and size class. The companion data object \"zooabund\" reports the counts of zooplankton per subsample/split by taxa and life stage or size class.
\n
Greenwich Mean Time was local time + 4 hours.
\n
Notes on Volume Filtered values:
\n
The 1 m2 MOCNESS net volume filtered data were corrected for the following net tows:
\n
The flowmeter used to calculate the volume of water filtered did not work for the tows shown below; the data shown in the listings for those tows are therefore derived, not measured. Using the net distance and the average angle of the net, the volume filtered was estimated. These estimates have about a 10% error or higher when currents were present.
\n
2001. No further corrections. MOC-1 net volume filtered values were used to calculate abundance/m3 for all net tows. No Optical Plankton Counter (OPC) volume filtered values were available for 2001.
\n
2002. The flowmeter data was not accurate for some net tows in 2002. Optical Plankton Counter (OPC) volume filtered was used to calculate abundance/m3 for all MOC-1 net tows, except casts 11 and 16 which used the MOC-1 volume filtered values. The decision to use OPC values was determined by plotting all OPC volume filtered numbers versus MOC-1 flow meter data (see below). MOC-1 flow meter data were consistently lower and had a lower R2 regression for volume filtered versus length of tow (time). Meng Zhou and Yiwi Zhu, who conducted the MOC-1 net tows, noted on the haul sheets that there were problems with the MOC-1 flow meters and that they often were not responsive or worked intermittently. Thus, it was decided that the OPC flow meter data provided a more consistent measure of net flow volume for 2002 net tows. The OPC mouth opening for flow meter data was corrected to the MOC-1 net mouth opening by multiplying the OPC flow data by 200. The two casts that used MOC-1 flow meter data were cases where the OPC flow meter data appeared to underestimate the flow.
\n
![\"LMG0202](\"https://datadocs.bco-dmo.org/static/globec.whoi.edu/images/kdaly_volfilt_info4.png\")
\n
Fig. 3. Volume filtered over time for both MOCNESS and Optical Plankton Counter showing consistently lower flow rates for the MOCNESS.
\n
Notes on missing samples:
\n
LMG0104 - Station 1A, tow 1, net 2: non-quantitative sample
\nLMG0104 - Station 1A, tow 1, net 8: no sample
![\"MOCNESS](\"http://globec.whoi.edu/images/MOC_station_map_LMG.png\")