{"@context":{"content":"http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/","dc":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","og":"http://ogp.me/ns#","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","sioc":"http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#","sioct":"http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#","skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","xsd":"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#","owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","rss":"http://purl.org/rss/1.0/","site":"https://www.bco-dmo.org/ns#","odo":"http://ocean-data.org/schema/","emo":"http://ocean-data.org/schema/entity-matching#","bibo":"http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/","crypto":"http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservation/cryptographicHashFunctions/","bcodmo":"http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/","tw":"http://tw.rpi.edu/schema/","dcat":"http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#","time":"http://www.w3.org/2006/time#","geo":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#","geosparql":"http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#","sf":"http://www.opengis.net/ont/sf#","void":"http://rdfs.org/ns/void#","sd":"http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description#","dctype":"http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/","prov":"http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#","schema":"http://schema.org/","geolink":"http://schema.geolink.org/1.0/base/main#","spdx":"http://spdx.org/rdf/terms#","bcodmo_vocab":"http://schema.bco-dmo.org/"},"@id":"http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/2498#graph","@graph":[{"http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/2498":{"@id":"http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/2498","@type":["http://ocean-data.org/schema/DeploymentDatasetCollection","http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#Dataset","http://ocean-data.org/schema/Dataset"],"http://ocean-data.org/schema/hasAcquisitionDescription":[{"@value":"
One deployment was made in 1997 at this site, Feb 18 to Jun 29 1997. (dates reflect dates of data not deployment time)
One deployment was made in 1997 at this site, Feb 18 to Jun 29 1997. (dates reflect dates of data not deployment time)
\n\nNote:\nSampling rates vary from instrument to instrument.\n\n1. The nominal position of the mooring is the designed deployment site\n and actual deployments varied by about 0.5 nm around this position.\n2. Sensor depths are nominal designed depths. In water sensors vary\n around this designed depth by about 1 m, variation larger at greater\n distance below buoy.\n3. Temperatures are listed in the IPTS68 standard, rather than IPT90.\n4. Salinity conversion from conductivity was done with PSS78\n5. Sensor normalization was done with pre-cruise calibrations, and checked\n with post-cruise calibrations.\n6. Only minor editing has been done to remove spikes from records.\n7. No corrections have been made to fluorometer and transmissometer data\n to remove biological fouling induced drift.\n8. No corrections have been made to salinity for drifts due to biological\n fouling.\n\n updated 06/15/05; g.heimerdinger
\n1. The nominal position of the mooring is the designed deployment site\n and actual deployments varied by about 0.5 nm around this position.\n2. Sensor depths are nominal designed depths. In water sensors vary\n around this designed depth by about 1 m, variation larger at greater\n distance below buoy.\n3. Temperatures are listed in the IPTS68 standard, rather than IPT90.\n4. Salinity conversion from conductivity was done with PSS78\n5. Sensor normalization was done with pre-cruise calibrations, and checked\n with post-cruise calibrations.\n6. Only minor editing has been done to remove spikes from records.\n7. No corrections have been made to fluorometer and transmissometer data\n to remove biological fouling induced drift.\n8. No corrections have been made to salinity for drifts due to biological\n fouling.\n