{"@context":{"content":"http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/","dc":"http://purl.org/dc/terms/","foaf":"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/","og":"http://ogp.me/ns#","rdfs":"http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#","sioc":"http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#","sioct":"http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#","skos":"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#","xsd":"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#","owl":"http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#","rdf":"http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","rss":"http://purl.org/rss/1.0/","site":"https://www.bco-dmo.org/ns#","odo":"http://ocean-data.org/schema/","emo":"http://ocean-data.org/schema/entity-matching#","bibo":"http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/","crypto":"http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservation/cryptographicHashFunctions/","bcodmo":"http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/","tw":"http://tw.rpi.edu/schema/","dcat":"http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#","time":"http://www.w3.org/2006/time#","geo":"http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#","geosparql":"http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#","sf":"http://www.opengis.net/ont/sf#","void":"http://rdfs.org/ns/void#","sd":"http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description#","dctype":"http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/","prov":"http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#","schema":"http://schema.org/","geolink":"http://schema.geolink.org/1.0/base/main#","spdx":"http://spdx.org/rdf/terms#","bcodmo_vocab":"http://schema.bco-dmo.org/"},"@id":"http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/771333#graph","@graph":[{"http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/771333":{"@id":"http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/771333","@type":["http://ocean-data.org/schema/DeploymentDatasetCollection","http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#Dataset","http://ocean-data.org/schema/Dataset"],"http://ocean-data.org/schema/hasAcquisitionDescription":[{"@value":"
Three CO2 concentrations were tested: 410 ppm, 750 ppm, and 1000 ppm respectively. For each CO2 concentration, four temperatures were tested: 15 degrees-C, 20 degrees-C, 25 degrees-C, and 30 degrees-C. Within each temperature, three light levels were tested: a sub-optimum light (SOL) intensity of 60 umol photons \u00b7 m-2 \u00b7 s-1, an optimum light (OL) intensity of 400 umol photons \u00b7 m-2 \u00b7 s-1 and an extreme light (EL) intensity of 800 umol photons \u00b7 m-2 \u00b7 s-1. All lights were set at a 12 h day: 12 h dark cycle. For logistical reasons, experiments were partially conducted in series, with all light treatments at two temperatures (either 15 degrees-C and 25 degrees-C or 20 degrees-C and 30 degrees-C) running simultaneously. This was repeated for each CO2 concentration.
\nExperiments were conducted in Multicultivator MC-1000 OD units (Photon Systems Instruments, Drasov, Czech Republic). Each unit consists of eight 85 ml test-tubes immersed in a thermostated water bath, each independently illuminated by an array of cool white LEDs set at specific intensity and timing. A 0.2um filtered CO2-air mix (Praxair Distribution Inc.) was bubbled through sterile artificial seawater, and the humidified gas mix was supplied to each tube via gentle sparging through a 2um stainless steel diffuser. Flow rates were gradually increased over the course of the incubation to compensate for the DIC uptake of actively growing cells, and ranged from <0.04 Liters per minute (LPM) at the start of the incubations to 0.08 LPM in each tube after 2 days. For each CO2 and temperature level, replication was achieved by incubating three tubes at sub-optimum light intensities, two tubes at optimum light intensity, and three tubes at extreme light intensities. Each experiment was split into two phases: An acclimation phase spanning 4 days, was used to acclimate cultures to their new environment. Pre-acclimated, exponentially-growing cultures were then inoculated into fresh media and incubated through a 3-day experimental phase during which assessments of growth, photophysiology, and nutrient cycling were carried out daily. All sampling started 5 hours into the daily light cycle to minimize the effects of diurnal cycles.
\nExperiments were conducted with artificial seawater (ASW) prepared using previously described methods (Kester et. al 1967), and enriched with nitrate (NO3), phosphate (PO4), silicic acid (Si[OH]4), at levels ensuring that the cultures would remain nutrient-replete over the course of the experiment. Trace metals and vitamins were added as in f/2 (Guillard 1975). The expected DIC concentration and pH of the growth media was determined for the different pCO2 and temperatures using the CO2SYS calculator (Pierrot et al. 2006), with constants from Mehrbach et al. (1973, refit by Dickson & Millero 1987), and inputs of temperature, salinity, total alkalinity (2376.5 umol \u00b7 kg-1), pCO2, phosphate, and silicic acid. DIC levels in ASW at the start of each phase of the experiments were manipulated by the addition of NaHCO3, and was then maintained by bubbling a CO2-Air mix through the cultures over the course of the experiments. The pH of the growth media was measured spectrophometrically using the m-cresol purple method (Dickson 1993), and adjusted using 0.1N HCl or 0.1M NaOH. The media was distributed into 75 ml aliquots and each aliquot was inoculated with 5 ml of the T. pseudonana CCMP 1014 (TP1014) stock culture at the start of the experiments.
\nDissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC) measurements:
\nDIC was measured in freshly prepared media, and at the end of the experiment phase. 25 ml of the sample was siphoned into clean glass serum vials, fixed with HgCL2 (0.035% final conc. v/v), and sealed with butyl rubber septa. Samples were stored at 4 degrees-C until analyzed. Prior experiments had confirmed that no gas exchange, and/or change in DIC occurred during sample storage for up to 30 days using this method. Total dissolved inorganic carbon (TCO2) samples were analyzed using an automated infrared inorganic carbon analyzer (AIRICA).\u00a0 The AIRICA-23 (MARIANDA, Kiel, Germany), is a high precision instrument used to measure total dissolved inorganic carbon in seawater. The system uses a high precision syringe and a mass flow controller to deliver a known volume of sample into a stripper where it is then acidified, converting the inorganic carbon species into CO2 and delivered under constant flow to nondispersive infrared detector. The CO2 is then carried using an inert reference gas (N2) into a LICOR-7000 that measures pCO2 using the difference in infrared absorbance between a sample and reference cell. The pCO2 is recorded over time and integrated by the AIRICA software. This integrated value is proportional to the amount of dissolved inorganic carbon evolved from the sample and converted to carbon units using a conversion factor (CT Factor). The CT Factor is determined by calibration of the system against a certified reference material of known value (Dickson et al. 2007. Guide to Best Practices for Ocean CO2 Measurements). The value is converted to gravimetric units (umol/kg) using the volume, temperature and salinity of the sample. In order to check for analytical stability of the system throughout a run, a certified reference material is used in between every 5 samples. Replicate DIC measurements were averaged.
Problem report:\u00a0DIC measurements for two treatments (410 ppm CO2, 20\u00b0C), and (410 ppm CO2, 20\u00b0C) were flawed.
\n\u00a0
The experiments in Series 3A were designed to test the combined effects of three CO2 concentrations, four temperatures, and three light intensities on growth and photophysiology of the diatom T. pseudonana CCMP1014 in a multifactorial design. This dataset reports the dissolved inorganic carbon concentrations measured during the experiments.
BCO-DMO Processing Notes:
\n- added conventional header with dataset name, PI name, version date
\n- modified parameter names to conform with BCO-DMO naming conventions
\n- reduced precision of pH values to 2 decimal places
\n- changed \"- NA -\" to \"NA\" (\"not applicable\")