http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/2797
eng; USA
utf8
dataset
Highest level of data collection, from a common set of sensors or instrumentation, usually within the same research project
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
2009-02-12
ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata - Part 2: Extensions for Imagery and Gridded Data
ISO 19115-2:2009(E)
Maine/New Hampshire Inshore Trawl Survey: Catch Data from the F/V Robert Michael,F/V Tara Lynn NEC-JS2000-1 from the the Maine and New Hampshire coasts, 2000-2004 (NEC-CoopRes project)
2005-05-01
publication
2005-05-01
revision
Marine Biological Laboratory/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Library (MBLWHOI DLA)
2019-02-20
publication
https://doi.org/10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.2797.1
John Sowles
principalInvestigator
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
publisher
Cite this dataset as: Sowles, J. (2005) Maine/New Hampshire Inshore Trawl Survey: Catch Data from the F/V Robert Michael,F/V Tara Lynn NEC-JS2000-1 from the the Maine and New Hampshire coasts, 2000-2004 (NEC-CoopRes project). Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2005-05-01 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. doi:10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.2797.1 [access date]
Maine/New Hampshire Inshore Trawl Survey: Catch Data, 2000-2004 Dataset Description: <p><strong>Maine/New Hampshire Inshore Trawl Survey</strong><br />
Trawl Catch Data</p>
<p><strong>Project Leader: </strong><em>John Sowles,</em> Maine Department of Marine Resources<br />
<strong>Additional Participants:</strong><br />
<em>Sally Sherman, </em> Maine Department of Marine Resources<br />
<em>Yong Chen, </em> University of Maine<br />
<em>Jeff Flagg, </em> Portland Trawler Supply<br />
<em>Sam Galli, </em> F/V Tara Lynn<br />
<em>Doug Grout, </em> New Hampshire Fish and Game<br />
<em>Hannah Smith, </em> Maine Department of Marine Resources<br />
<em>Vincent Manfredi, </em> Maine Department of Marine Resources<br />
<em>Keri Stepanek, </em> Maine Department of Marine Resources<br />
<em>Robert Tetrault, </em> F/V Tara Lynn<br />
<em>Curt Rice, </em> F/V Robert Michael</p>
<p>"This project is a fishery independent multi-species stock assessment along the Maine and New Hampshire inshore waters. The overall goal of the project is to establish a solid foundation for long-term fishery-independent monitoring of the Gulf of Maine inshore waters, filling an information gap on the status and trends of groundfish and other species in this area for which assessment data would otherwise be absent. Funded in part by the Northeast Consortium and in part by the NOAA Fisheries Cooperative Research Partners Program, the survey began in the fall of 2000 and consists of annual, spring and fall stratified random surveys, each covering approximately 115 stations from New Hampshire to Canada. The project is a close partnership with commercial fishermen and the two state agencies charged with managing the inshore state waters. Data is being provided for the management of a number of species including lobster, shrimp, crab, scallop, shad, herring, and groundfish. The project is contributing to stock abundance, structure, and recruitment indices for the area and compliments data from the NOAA Fisheries bottom trawl survey in the Gulf of Maine and the Massachusetts Department of Marine Fisheries inshore trawl survey.</p>
<p>In August 2005, and independent peer review of the project was facilitated by the Northeast Consortium. It was conducted to determine the viability of using the data in regional stock assessments and to improve the project for the future. The project received funding again in 2005 from the Northeast Consortium and the participants are incorporating many of the panel's recommendations in current and future surveys." <em>extracted from: Summary of Completed Cooperative Research Projects Funded by the Northeast Consortium, January 2006</em></p>
<p><strong>Companion/support files:</strong><br />
<a href="http://nec.whoi.edu/jg/serv/nec/Stock/inshore_fishlist.html0%7Bdir=nec.whoi.edu/jg/dir/nec/Stock/,info=nec.whoi.edu/jg/info/nec/Stock/inshore_fishlist%7D">Species List</a><br />
<a href="http://nec.whoi.edu/jg/serv/nec/Stock/inshore_station.html0%7Bdir=nec.whoi.edu/jg/dir/nec/Stock/,info=nec.whoi.edu/jg/info/nec/Stock/inshore_station%7D">Station Meta Data</a><br />
<a href="http://nec.whoi.edu/jg/serv/nec/Stock/inshore_lenfreq.html0%7Bdir=nec.whoi.edu/jg/dir/nec/Stock/,info=nec.whoi.edu/jg/info/nec/Stock/inshore_lenfreq%7D">Length Frequency Data</a><br />
<a href="http://nec.whoi.edu/jg/serv/nec/Stock/inshore_lobdat.html0%7Bdir=nec.whoi.edu/jg/dir/nec/Stock/,info=nec.whoi.edu/jg/info/nec/Stock/inshore_lobdat%7D">Lobster Catch Data</a><br />
<a href="http://nec.whoi.edu/jg/serv/nec/Stock/inshore_bio.html0%7Bdir=nec.whoi.edu/jg/dir/nec/Stock/,info=nec.whoi.edu/jg/info/nec/Stock/inshore_bio%7D">Bio Maturity Data</a><br />
For a detailed description of the sampling schema see <a href="http://www.northeastconsortium.org/ProjectFileDownload.pm?report_id=327&amp;table=project_report">Final Report</a> starting on page 3.</p>
<p>Data Elements<br />
Parameter Names and Descriptions<br />
Trawl Catch Data</p>
<p><a href="http://www.northeastconsortium.org/ProjectFileDownload.pm?report_id=327&amp;table=project_report">Final Report</a> starting on page 4.<br />
1 = NH-Southern ME<br />
2 = Casco Bay - Midcoast<br />
3 = Penobscot Bay<br />
4 = Jerico-Frenchmans Bay<br />
5 = Downeast, ME over the survey area.<br />
For more detail see Final Report page 5<br />
<br />
depth strata code (years 2003-2004) where:<br />
1 = 5-20 fathoms,<br />
2 = 21-35 fathoms,<br />
3 = 36-55 fathoms,<br />
4 = 55-85+ fathoms incorporated into "fishid" after 2004</p>
<p><strong><em>nb</em>: All catch data have been adjusted to a standard tow of 20 minutes duration.</strong></p>
<p>Project website: <a href="http://www.state.me.us/dmr/rm/trawl/">http://www.state.me.us/dmr/rm/trawl/</a></p>
<p><em>Last modified 10/26/06; gfh</em></p>
<pre>
&nbsp;</pre> Methods and Sampling: <p>Two surveys were conducted; one in the fall beginning October 30, 2000 and a second in the spring, beginning on April 23, 2001. Each cruise required 25 days over a period of five weeks. . Descriptive data, including geo-references, trawl duration, depth, salinity and temperature for each survey are presented. Obviously, a single year of data affords no ability to develop a time series to be used for more than anything but the most general of conclusions. Also, since this was the first year, the first few weeks of the fall survey, especially, was a period in which the crew was testing and developing skills, procedures, and methods. Nevertheless, data collected from this first year does reveal some interesting findings. Ninety-nine taxonomic groups of fish and invertebrates were caught. For this report, we have selected examples for which we can report results. The complete catch result summaries are presented by species for each stratum. Fall 2000 Summary Seventy eight of the 96 planned tows were made. Untowable bottom and presence of fixed gear prevented us from towing the 18 not towed. The volume of the total mixed catch varied from a minimum of 4 kg to a maximum of 640 kg per tow. The average weight of catch was about 122 kg per tow. The total number of species caught in the fall was 80 with a low of 7 and high of 31 in any particular tow. Relative coastwide ranking for the top 10 species is reported below in descending order.</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>By Number</strong></td>
<td><strong>By Weight</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Herring*</td>
<td>Silver Hake*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Silver Hake*</td>
<td>Lobster</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mixed Shrimp</td>
<td>Herring*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alewife</td>
<td>Dogfish*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lobster</td>
<td>Alewife</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rainbow Smelt</td>
<td>Winter Flounder*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scallop*</td>
<td>Red Hake*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Winter Flounder*</td>
<td>Longhorn Sculpin</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Longhorn Sculpin</td>
<td>Monkfish*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Menhaden</td>
<td>White Hake*</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Species managed by the New England Fisheries Management Council</p>
<p>Species managed by the New England Fisheries Management Council Spring 2001 One hundred eleven tows were made in the spring. We were able to achieve this by anticipating untowable bottom and planning 1 extra randomly selected alternate tow per stratum for a total of 115 planned tows. Weight of total mixed catch varied from a minimum of 4.5 kg to a maximum of 5,007 kg per tow, with an average of 87 kg per tow. Number of species caught per tow ranged from 4 to 31. Total number of species caught during the Spring 2001 survey was 87. Relative coastwide ranking for the top 10 species is reported below in descending order.</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>By Number</strong></td>
<td><strong>By Weight</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Herring*</td>
<td>Herring*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mixed Shrimp</td>
<td>Lobster</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alewife</td>
<td>Longhorn Sculpin</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Silver Hake*</td>
<td>Sea Cucumber</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blue-back herring</td>
<td>Silver Hake*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Longhorn Sculpin</td>
<td>Alewife</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lobster</td>
<td>Winter Flounder*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scallops*</td>
<td>American Plaice*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Winter Flounder*</td>
<td>Sea Scallop*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>American Plaice*</td>
<td>Sea Raven</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Species managed by the New England Fisheries Management Council.</p>
<p>With 61 finfish species and 38 types of invertebrates sampled, a species by species presentation of results is not practical for this report. However, following are some examples of the sorts of results that this survey can produce. Note that we include some examples of non-groundfish species to demonstrate another attribute of a fisheries independent survey; that the survey can provide information beneficial for management of the system and not focus soley on a select suite of target species. Information is gathered on an ecological community level. Rainbow smelt, for example, may not be directly exploited commercially but it provides enjoyment to upland recreational anglers and on an ecological level is a forage species for higher trophic levels. Sculpins, cartilaginous species, and predator-prey ratios, for example, have been used as indicators of system-wide health. Landings data do not include information on these species. Over the long term, system shifts as a result of climate change may be assessed as exemplified when the Fall Survey encountered species such as barracudina and scup that historically have not been common north of Cape Ann, Massachusetts. By looking at population structure as well as distribution, the importance of shallow inshore habitat for cod becomes clear. The Fall 2000 portion of Figure 8 shows a year class of cod that probably hatched in February-April 1999. Most are still in the shallowest strata. As the fish grow, they move offshore and disperse into deeper water. In the Spring 2001 portion of Figure 8, one can see young of the year in the shallow strata. Offshore in the spring, there appears to be more cod in the deeper strata but certainly not in the numbers that were observed the previous fall. From a single year’s tow, it is not possible to know whether or not the spring survey missed the next year class due to late inshore migration or whether there simply was a weak year class. Cod, and most other groundfish species, move into deeper (warmer) water in late fall to return in the spring as inshore waters warm. Whether the fish were still farther offshore and had not migrated in at the time of the spring survey, we cannot determine. The spring of 2001 was cooler than normal. Subsequent year’s tows and comparisons with the offshore NMFS data set will help to resolve this question. As the Maine spring spawning closure for groundfish 'sunsets' at the end of 2002, trawl survey data will be used to evaluate the need to extend the closure during the next Maine legislative session.</p>
Funding provided by NorthEast Consortium (NEC) Award Number: unknown NEC-CoopRes NEC
completed
John Sowles
207-633-9518
P.O. Box 8
West Boothbay Harbor
ME
04575-0008
USA
john.sowles@maine.gov
pointOfContact
asNeeded
Dataset Version: 1
Unknown
year
season
towid
depth_fm
region
depth_strata
fishid
taxa
weight_kg_total
num_caught
common_name
grid
lat
lon
Trawl_custom
theme
None, User defined
year
No BCO-DMO term
num_caught
latitude
longitude
featureType
BCO-DMO Standard Parameters
Trawl_custom
instrument
BCO-DMO Standard Instruments
NEC-JS2000-1
service
Deployment Activity
the Maine and New Hampshire coasts
place
Locations
otherRestrictions
otherRestrictions
Access Constraints: none. Use Constraints: Please follow guidelines at: http://www.bco-dmo.org/terms-use Distribution liability: Under no circumstances shall BCO-DMO be liable for any direct, incidental, special, consequential, indirect, or punitive damages that result from the use of, or the inability to use, the materials in this data submission. If you are dissatisfied with any materials in this data submission your sole and exclusive remedy is to discontinue use.
NorthEast Consortium
http://northeastconsortium.org/
NorthEast Consortium
The Northeast Consortium encourages and fundscooperative research and monitoring projects in the Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank that have effective,equal partnerships among fishermen, scientists, educators, and marine resource managers.
At the 2008 Maine Fisheremen's Forum, the Northeast Consortium organized a session on data collection and availability. Participants included several key organizations in the Gulf of Maine area, sharing what data are out there and how you can find them.
The Northeast Consortium has joined the Gulf of Maine Ocean Data Partnership. The purpose of the GoMODP is to promote and coordinate the sharing, linking, electronic dissemination, and use of data on the Gulf of Maine region.
The Northeast Consortium was created in 1999 to encourage and fund effective, equal partnerships among commercial fishermen, scientists, and other stakeholders to engage in cooperative research and monitoring projects in the Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank. The Northeast Consortium consists of four research institutions (University of New Hampshire, University of Maine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution), which are working together to foster this initiative.
The Northeast Consortium administers nearly $5M annually from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for cooperative research on a broad range of topics including gear selectivity, fish habitat, stock assessments, and socioeconomics. The funding is appropriated to the National Marine Fisheries Service and administered by the University of New Hampshire on behalf of the Northeast Consortium. Funds are distributed through an annual open competition, which is announced via a Request for Proposals (RFP). All projects must involve partnership between commercial fishermen and scientists.
The Northeast Consortium seeks to fund projects that will be conducted in a responsible manner. Cooperative research projects should be designed to minimize any negative impacts to ecosystems or marine organisms, and be consistent with accepted ethical research practices, including the use of animals and human subjects in research, scrutiny of research protocols by an institutional board of review, etc.
NEC
largerWorkCitation
program
Northeast Consortium: Cooperative Research
http://northeastconsortium.org/
Northeast Consortium: Cooperative Research
<p>The Northeast Consortium encourages and funds cooperative research and monitoring projects in the Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank that have effective, equal partnerships among fishermen, scientists, educators, and marine resource managers.</p>
<p>The Northeast Consortium seeks to fund projects that will be conducted in a responsible manner. Cooperative research projects are designed to minimize any negative impacts to ecosystems or marine organisms, and be consistent with accepted ethical research practices, including the use of animals and human subjects in research, scrutiny of research protocols by an institutional board of review, etc.</p>
NEC-CoopRes
largerWorkCitation
project
eng; USA
biota
oceans
the Maine and New Hampshire coasts
-70.7545
-66.9519
42.863
44.7117
2000-09-01
2004-06-30
Georges Bank, Gulf of Maine
0
BCO-DMO catalogue of parameters from Maine/New Hampshire Inshore Trawl Survey: Catch Data from the F/V Robert Michael,F/V Tara Lynn NEC-JS2000-1 from the the Maine and New Hampshire coasts, 2000-2004 (NEC-CoopRes project)
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/13750.rdf
Name: year
Units: unknown
Description: year, 4 diget year
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/13751.rdf
Name: season
Units: unknown
Description: season of year, i.e. spring, fall
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/13752.rdf
Name: towid
Units: unknown
Description: Unique identifier for each tow. FL indicates Fall, SP indicates Spring, followed by a two digit year designation and a consecutive tow number
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/13753.rdf
Name: depth_fm
Units: unknown
Description: water depth at start or end of tow in fathoms
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/13754.rdf
Name: region
Units: unknown
Description: One of five geographic regions. For more detail seeFinal Report starting on page 4. 1 = NH-Southern ME 2 = Casco Bay - Midcoast3 = Penobscot Bay4 = Jerico-Frenchmans Bay5 = Downeast, ME
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/13755.rdf
Name: depth_strata
Units: unknown
Description: depth strata code (years 2000-2002) where: 1 = 5-20 fathoms, 2 = 21-35 fathoms, 3 = 36-50+ fathoms depth strata code (years 2003-2004) where: 1 = 5-20 fathoms, 2 = 21-35 fathoms, 3 = 36-55 fathoms, 4 = 55-85+ fathoms
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/13756.rdf
Name: fishid
Units: unknown
Description: Numeric code for species."id_code" (from inshore_fishlist object) isincorporated into "fishid" after 2004
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/13757.rdf
Name: taxa
Units: unknown
Description: Scientific name of animal.
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/13758.rdf
Name: weight_kg_total
Units: unknown
Description: Total weight of specified species (per fishid), in kilograms
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/13759.rdf
Name: num_caught
Units: unknown
Description: Number of specified species (per fishid) caught.
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/13760.rdf
Name: common_name
Units: unknown
Description: Common name of animal.
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/13761.rdf
Name: grid
Units: unknown
Description: grid number, A one square nautical mile grid system was placedover the survey area. For more detail see Final Report page 5
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/756150.rdf
Name: lat
Units: decimal degrees
Description: latitude; north is positive
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/756151.rdf
Name: lon
Units: decimal degrees
Description: longitude; east is positive
GB/NERC/BODC > British Oceanographic Data Centre, Natural Environment Research Council, United Kingdom
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
404736
https://darchive.mblwhoilibrary.org/bitstream/1912/23685/1/dataset-2797_inshorecatch__v1.tsv
download
https://doi.org/10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.2797.1
download
onLine
dataset
<p>Two surveys were conducted; one in the fall beginning October 30, 2000 and a second in the spring, beginning on April 23, 2001. Each cruise required 25 days over a period of five weeks. . Descriptive data, including geo-references, trawl duration, depth, salinity and temperature for each survey are presented. Obviously, a single year of data affords no ability to develop a time series to be used for more than anything but the most general of conclusions. Also, since this was the first year, the first few weeks of the fall survey, especially, was a period in which the crew was testing and developing skills, procedures, and methods. Nevertheless, data collected from this first year does reveal some interesting findings. Ninety-nine taxonomic groups of fish and invertebrates were caught. For this report, we have selected examples for which we can report results. The complete catch result summaries are presented by species for each stratum. Fall 2000 Summary Seventy eight of the 96 planned tows were made. Untowable bottom and presence of fixed gear prevented us from towing the 18 not towed. The volume of the total mixed catch varied from a minimum of 4 kg to a maximum of 640 kg per tow. The average weight of catch was about 122 kg per tow. The total number of species caught in the fall was 80 with a low of 7 and high of 31 in any particular tow. Relative coastwide ranking for the top 10 species is reported below in descending order.</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>By Number</strong></td>
<td><strong>By Weight</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Herring*</td>
<td>Silver Hake*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Silver Hake*</td>
<td>Lobster</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mixed Shrimp</td>
<td>Herring*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alewife</td>
<td>Dogfish*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lobster</td>
<td>Alewife</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rainbow Smelt</td>
<td>Winter Flounder*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scallop*</td>
<td>Red Hake*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Winter Flounder*</td>
<td>Longhorn Sculpin</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Longhorn Sculpin</td>
<td>Monkfish*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Menhaden</td>
<td>White Hake*</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Species managed by the New England Fisheries Management Council</p>
<p>Species managed by the New England Fisheries Management Council Spring 2001 One hundred eleven tows were made in the spring. We were able to achieve this by anticipating untowable bottom and planning 1 extra randomly selected alternate tow per stratum for a total of 115 planned tows. Weight of total mixed catch varied from a minimum of 4.5 kg to a maximum of 5,007 kg per tow, with an average of 87 kg per tow. Number of species caught per tow ranged from 4 to 31. Total number of species caught during the Spring 2001 survey was 87. Relative coastwide ranking for the top 10 species is reported below in descending order.</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>By Number</strong></td>
<td><strong>By Weight</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Herring*</td>
<td>Herring*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mixed Shrimp</td>
<td>Lobster</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alewife</td>
<td>Longhorn Sculpin</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Silver Hake*</td>
<td>Sea Cucumber</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blue-back herring</td>
<td>Silver Hake*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Longhorn Sculpin</td>
<td>Alewife</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lobster</td>
<td>Winter Flounder*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scallops*</td>
<td>American Plaice*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Winter Flounder*</td>
<td>Sea Scallop*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>American Plaice*</td>
<td>Sea Raven</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Species managed by the New England Fisheries Management Council.</p>
<p>With 61 finfish species and 38 types of invertebrates sampled, a species by species presentation of results is not practical for this report. However, following are some examples of the sorts of results that this survey can produce. Note that we include some examples of non-groundfish species to demonstrate another attribute of a fisheries independent survey; that the survey can provide information beneficial for management of the system and not focus soley on a select suite of target species. Information is gathered on an ecological community level. Rainbow smelt, for example, may not be directly exploited commercially but it provides enjoyment to upland recreational anglers and on an ecological level is a forage species for higher trophic levels. Sculpins, cartilaginous species, and predator-prey ratios, for example, have been used as indicators of system-wide health. Landings data do not include information on these species. Over the long term, system shifts as a result of climate change may be assessed as exemplified when the Fall Survey encountered species such as barracudina and scup that historically have not been common north of Cape Ann, Massachusetts. By looking at population structure as well as distribution, the importance of shallow inshore habitat for cod becomes clear. The Fall 2000 portion of Figure 8 shows a year class of cod that probably hatched in February-April 1999. Most are still in the shallowest strata. As the fish grow, they move offshore and disperse into deeper water. In the Spring 2001 portion of Figure 8, one can see young of the year in the shallow strata. Offshore in the spring, there appears to be more cod in the deeper strata but certainly not in the numbers that were observed the previous fall. From a single year’s tow, it is not possible to know whether or not the spring survey missed the next year class due to late inshore migration or whether there simply was a weak year class. Cod, and most other groundfish species, move into deeper (warmer) water in late fall to return in the spring as inshore waters warm. Whether the fish were still farther offshore and had not migrated in at the time of the spring survey, we cannot determine. The spring of 2001 was cooler than normal. Subsequent year’s tows and comparisons with the offshore NMFS data set will help to resolve this question. As the Maine spring spawning closure for groundfish 'sunsets' at the end of 2002, trawl survey data will be used to evaluate the need to extend the closure during the next Maine legislative session.</p>
from Cruise: NEC-JS2000-1 Two surveys were conducted; one in the fall beginning October 30, 2000 and a second in the spring, beginning on April 23, 2001. Each cruise required 25 days over a period of five weeks. . Descriptive data, including geo-references, trawl duration, depth, salinity and temperature for each survey are presented.
Obviously, a single year of data affords no ability to develop a time series to be used for more than anything but the most general of conclusions. Also, since this was the first year, the first few weeks of the fall survey, especially, was a period in which the crew was testing and developing skills, procedures, and methods. Nevertheless, data collected from this first year does reveal some interesting findings.
Ninety-nine taxonomic groups of fish and invertebrates were caught. For this report, we have selected examples for which we can report results. The complete catch result summaries are presented by species for each stratum.
Fall 2000 Summary
Seventy eight of the 96 planned tows were made. Untowable bottom and presence of fixed gear prevented us from towing the 18 not towed. The volume of the total mixed catch varied from a minimum of 4 kg to a maximum of 640 kg per tow. The average weight of catch was about 122 kg per tow. The total number of species caught in the fall was 80 with a low of 7 and high of 31 in any particular tow. Relative coastwide ranking for the top 10 species is reported below in descending order.
By Number By Weight
Herring* Silver Hake*
Silver Hake* Lobster
Mixed Shrimp Herring*
Alewife Dogfish*
Lobster Alewife
Rainbow Smelt Winter Flounder*
Scallop* Red Hake*
Winter Flounder* Longhorn Sculpin
Longhorn Sculpin Monkfish*
Menhaden White Hake*
* Species managed by the New England Fisheries Management Council
Spring 2001
One hundred eleven tows were made in the spring. We were able to achieve this by anticipating untowable bottom and planning 1 extra randomly selected alternate tow per stratum for a total of 115 planned tows. Weight of total mixed catch varied from a minimum of 4.5 kg to a maximum of 5,007 kg per tow, with an average of 87 kg per tow. Number of species caught per tow ranged from 4 to 31. Total number of species caught during the Spring 2001 survey was 87. Relative coastwide ranking for the top 10 species is reported below in descending order.
By Number By Weight
Herring* Herring*
Mixed Shrimp Lobster
Alewife Longhorn Sculpin
Silver Hake* Sea Cucumber
Blue-back herring Silver Hake*
Longhorn Sculpin Alewife
Lobster Winter Flounder*
Scallops* American Plaice*
Winter Flounder* Sea Scallop*
American Plaice* Sea Raven
* Species managed by the New England Fisheries Management Council
With 61 finfish species and 38 types of invertebrates sampled, a species by species presentation of results is not practical for this report. However, following are some examples of the sorts of results that this survey can produce. Note that we include some examples of non-groundfish species to demonstrate another attribute of a fisheries independent survey; that the survey can provide information beneficial for management of the system and not focus soley on a select suite of target species. Information is gathered on an ecological community level. Rainbow smelt, for example, may not be directly exploited commercially but it provides enjoyment to upland recreational anglers and on an ecological level is a forage species for higher trophic levels. Sculpins, cartilaginous species, and predator-prey ratios, for example, have been used as indicators of system-wide health. Landings data do not include information on these species. Over the long term, system shifts as a result of climate change may be assessed as exemplified when the Fall Survey encountered species such as barracudina and scup that historically have not been common north of Cape Ann, Massachusetts.
By looking at population structure as well as distribution, the importance of shallow inshore habitat for cod becomes clear. The Fall 2000 portion of Figure 8 shows a year class of cod that probably hatched in February-April 1999. Most are still in the shallowest strata. As the fish grow, they move offshore and disperse into deeper water. In the Spring 2001 portion of Figure 8, one can see young of the year in the shallow strata. Offshore in the spring, there appears to be more cod in the deeper strata but certainly not in the numbers that were observed the previous fall. From a single year’s tow, it is not possible to know whether or not the spring survey missed the next year class due to late inshore migration or whether there simply was a weak year class. Cod, and most other groundfish species, move into deeper (warmer) water in late fall to return in the spring as inshore waters warm. Whether the fish were still farther offshore and had not migrated in at the time of the spring survey, we cannot determine. The spring of 2001 was cooler than normal. Subsequent year’s tows and comparisons with the offshore NMFS data set will help to resolve this question. As the Maine spring spawning closure for groundfish “sunsets” at the end of 2002, trawl survey data will be used to evaluate the need to extend the closure during the next Maine legislative session.
Specified by the Principal Investigator(s)
<p>"This project is a fishery independent multi-species stock assessment along the Maine and New Hampshire inshore waters. The overall goal of the project is to establish a solid foundation for long-term fishery-independent monitoring of the Gulf of Maine inshore waters, filling an information gap on the status and trends of groundfish and other species in this area for which assessment data would otherwise be absent. Funded in part by the Northeast Consortium and in part by the NOAA Fisheries Cooperative Research Partners Program, the survey began in the fall of 2000 and consists of annual, spring and fall stratified random surveys, each covering approximately 115 stations from New Hampshire to Canada. The project is a close partnership with commercial fishermen and the two state agencies charged with managing the inshore state waters. Data is being provided for the management of a number of species including lobster, shrimp, crab, scallop, shad, herring, and groundfish. The project is contributing to stock abundance, structure, and recruitment indices for the area and compliments data from the NOAA Fisheries bottom trawl survey in the Gulf of Maine and the Massachusetts Department of Marine Fisheries inshore trawl survey.</p>
from Cruise: NEC-JS2000-1 "This project is a fishery independent multi-species stock assessment along the Maine and New Hampshire inshore waters. The overall goal of the project is to establish a solid foundation for long-term fishery-independent monitoring of the Gulf of Maine inshore waters, filling an information gap on the status and trends of groundfish and other species in this area for which assessment data would otherwise be absent. Funded in part by the Northeast Consortium and in part by the NOAA Fisheries Cooperative Research Partners Program, the survey began in the fall of 2000 and consists of annual, spring and fall stratified random surveys, each covering approximately 115 stations from New Hampshire to Canada. The project is a close partnership with commercial fishermen and the two state agencies charged with managing the inshore state waters. Data is being provided for the management of a number of species including lobster, shrimp, crab, scallop, shad, herring, and groundfish. The project is contributing to stock abundance, structure, and recruitment indices for the area and compliments data from the NOAA Fisheries bottom trawl survey in the Gulf of Maine and the Massachusetts Department of Marine Fisheries inshore trawl survey.
Specified by the Principal Investigator(s)
asNeeded
7.x-1.1
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
Trawl_custom
Trawl_custom
PI Supplied Instrument Name: Trawl_custom PI Supplied Instrument Description:The net is a scaled down version of the most common shrimp and modified shrimp net design used by Maine’s dragger fleet. The net was designed by the vessel owner and his net designer, Jeff Flagg, to fish effectively, be easily maintained, and be towed by vessels ranging from 45 - 70 ft. with nominal horsepower. Net tapers were cut to permit the shape of the net to get maximum height, while allowing the net to remain tight on the bottom. The net is shackled from the footrope to the frame using two 3/8-inch shackles to a banded wire that runs parallel with the footrope. Heavy rubber wing bobbins retard bottom wing lift. The top leg is 3/8th inch wire, 15 fathoms long, and the bottom leg is 15 fathoms. The net is constructed of 2 inch mesh overall with a 1/2 inch mesh liner in the cod end. Doors are #7.5 Bisons. The 70 ft. footrope includes 70’ of 6 inch cookies. Chain sweeps were not used. Between surveys, the net is sent back to the manufacturer where it is returned to specification. Instrument Name: Trawl_custom Instrument Short Name:Custom Trawl Instrument Description: A net towed through the water column designed to sample free-swimming nekton or fish, varies in design depending on the research project. Community Standard Description: http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/L05/current/23/
Cruise: NEC-JS2000-1
NEC-JS2000-1
F/V Robert Michael,F/V Tara Lynn
vessel
NEC-JS2000-1
John Sowles
http://northeastconsortium.org/ProjectFileDownload.pm?report_id=340&table=project_report
Report describing NEC-JS2000-1
F/V Robert Michael,F/V Tara Lynn
vessel