http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/525499
eng; USA
utf8
dataset
Highest level of data collection, from a common set of sensors or instrumentation, usually within the same research project
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
2014-08-21
ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata - Part 2: Extensions for Imagery and Gridded Data
ISO 19115-2:2009(E)
Benthic invertebrates from 6 sites pooled, USVI: 1992-2007 (St. John LTREB project)
2014-08-20
publication
2014-08-20
revision
Marine Biological Laboratory/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Library (MBLWHOI DLA)
2023-03-09
publication
https://doi.org/10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.525499.1
Peter J. Edmunds
California State University Northridge
principalInvestigator
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
publisher
Cite this dataset as: Edmunds, P. J. (2022) Benthic invertebrates from 6 sites pooled, USVI: 1992-2007 (St. John LTREB project). Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2014-08-20 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. doi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.525499.1 [access date]
Benthic invertebrates from 6 sites pooled, USVI: 1992-2007 Dataset Description: <p>Photoquadrats from St. John, USVI,&nbsp;were used to assess the abundance of benthic invertebrates on shallow reefs of St. John, USVI from 1992-2007. &nbsp;This dataset contains biennial species counts of 30 benthic invertebrates from 6 sites.</p>
<p>These data were used in&nbsp;Colvard NB, Edmunds PJ. (2011)</p> Methods and Sampling: <p>To assess changes in abundance of invertebrates and evaluate their relationship to the cover of corals and macroalgae, data were contrasted among times in biennial increments. Each of the six sites consisted of a single transect parallel to the 7-9 m depth contour, along which photoquadrats (0.25 m^2) have been sampled since 1992. A 20-m transect was used prior to 2001 when ~17 photoquadrats were recorded on 35-mm film, but thereafter, a 40-m transect has been used along which ~40 photoquadrats were recorded using digital photography. The photoquadrats were positioned randomly along transects every year, and initially were recorded with a Nikonos V camera fitted with a 28-mm lens, strobes, and slide film (Kodachrome 64). Since 2001, digital photography with either 3.3 megapixel (Nikon Cool Pix 990) or 6.1 megapixel (Nikon D70) resolution has been employed. All cameras were mounted on a framer to hold them perpendicular to the reef.</p>
<p>To census the population density of invertebrates, photoquadrats were screened to identify tractable taxa based on size (&gt;=3-cm diameter) and appearance. These organisms were identified to class, genus, and species wherever possible, although species resolution sometimes proved unreliable. The initial screening revealed a consensus group of 30 taxa (Table S1). As these taxa varied in abundance, and many were rarely seen in photoquadrats (&lt;4 individuals/year), a subset of the initial group was created by selecting taxa that were relatively abundant (e.g., found in an average of 12% of the quadrats censused each year). This subset consisted of 14 species from 14 genera and four classes (See supplemental file: table S1), and was used to evaluate temporal trends in populations at a lower taxonomic level.</p>
<p>Organisms were counted on images enlarged by projection, or on computermonitors. Unitary organisms were easily counted, but colonial taxa were defined as individuals based on areas of autonomous tissue. Therefore, colonial taxa with several portions of unconnected tissue were scored as multiple individuals, even though they might share a common genotype through fission. Organismswere only scored if &gt;50% of their area occurred within the photoquadrat, and when they occurred in adjacent photoquadrats, were scored only once.</p>
<p>In August 2007, benthic invertebrates were counted in situ at all sites to compare abundances with those generated from photoquadrats in the same year. In situ countswere completed during the day in quadrats (1x1 m) placed in a similar manner to the photoquadrats. Although these surveys revealed greater species richness than was visible in the photoquadrats, the enumeration was restricted to those taxa that previously had been identified as tractable. To compare the two techniques, mean abundances of the invertebrates were calculated by class, standardized to a common area, and contrasted by t-tests using quadrats as statistical replicates. Where significant differences were detected between invertebrate abundances originating from in situ and photographic techniques, the mean abundance by the photoquadrat technique were expressed as a percentage of the mean value from the field counts to evaluate the bias in using photoquadrats to quantify invertebrates (See supplemental file: figure S1).</p>
Funding provided by NSF Division of Environmental Biology (NSF DEB) Award Number: DEB-0841441 Award URL: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/show-award?AWD_ID=0841441
Funding provided by NSF Division of Environmental Biology (NSF DEB) Award Number: DEB-0343570 Award URL: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/show-award?AWD_ID=0343570
completed
Peter J. Edmunds
California State University Northridge
818-677-2502
Department of Biology 18111 Nordhoff Street
Northridge
CA
91330-8303
USA
peter.edmunds@csun.edu
pointOfContact
asNeeded
Dataset Version: 1
Unknown
year
site
lat
lon
image_id
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
AB
AC
AD
camera
theme
None, User defined
year
site
latitude
longitude
No BCO-DMO term
taxon_code
featureType
BCO-DMO Standard Parameters
Camera
instrument
BCO-DMO Standard Instruments
Edmunds_VINP
service
Deployment Activity
Great Lameshure Bay, St. John, US Virgin Island
place
Locations
otherRestrictions
otherRestrictions
Access Constraints: none. Use Constraints: Please follow guidelines at: http://www.bco-dmo.org/terms-use Distribution liability: Under no circumstances shall BCO-DMO be liable for any direct, incidental, special, consequential, indirect, or punitive damages that result from the use of, or the inability to use, the materials in this data submission. If you are dissatisfied with any materials in this data submission your sole and exclusive remedy is to discontinue use.
LTREB Long-term coral reef community dynamics in St. John, USVI: 1987-2019
http://coralreefs.csun.edu/
LTREB Long-term coral reef community dynamics in St. John, USVI: 1987-2019
<p><strong>Long Term Research in Environmental Biology (LTREB) in US Virgin Islands:</strong></p>
<p><em>From the NSF award abstract:</em><br />
In an era of growing human pressures on natural resources, there is a critical need to understand how major ecosystems will respond, the extent to which resource management can lessen the implications of these responses, and the likely state of these ecosystems in the future. Time-series analyses of community structure provide a vital tool in meeting these needs and promise a profound understanding of community change. This study focuses on coral reef ecosystems; an existing time-series analysis of the coral community structure on the reefs of St. John, US Virgin Islands, will be expanded to 27 years of continuous data in annual increments. Expansion of the core time-series data will be used to address five questions: (1) To what extent is the ecology at a small spatial scale (1-2 km) representative of regional scale events (10's of km)? (2) What are the effects of declining coral cover in modifying the genetic population structure of the coral host and its algal symbionts? (3) What are the roles of pre- versus post-settlement events in determining the population dynamics of small corals? (4) What role do physical forcing agents (other than temperature) play in driving the population dynamics of juvenile corals? and (5) How are populations of other, non-coral invertebrates responding to decadal-scale declines in coral cover? Ecological methods identical to those used over the last two decades will be supplemented by molecular genetic tools to understand the extent to which declining coral cover is affecting the genetic diversity of the corals remaining. An information management program will be implemented to create broad access by the scientific community to the entire data set.</p>
<p>The importance of this study lies in the extreme longevity of the data describing coral reefs in a unique ecological context, and the immense potential that these data possess for understanding both the patterns of comprehensive community change (i.e., involving corals, other invertebrates, and genetic diversity), and the processes driving them. Importantly, as this project is closely integrated with resource management within the VI National Park, as well as larger efforts to study coral reefs in the US through the NSF Moorea Coral Reef LTER, it has a strong potential to have scientific and management implications that extend further than the location of the study.</p>
St. John LTREB
largerWorkCitation
project
eng; USA
oceans
Great Lameshure Bay, St. John, US Virgin Island
-64.73152
-64.72132
18.30702
18.31705
1990-01-01
2077-12-31
St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands; California State University Northridge
0
BCO-DMO catalogue of parameters from Benthic invertebrates from 6 sites pooled, USVI: 1992-2007 (St. John LTREB project)
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874648.rdf
Name: year
Units: YYYY
Description: <p>year of survey</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874649.rdf
Name: site
Units: unitless
Description: <p>location of survey</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874650.rdf
Name: lat
Units: decimal degrees
Description: <p>latitude; north is positive</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874651.rdf
Name: lon
Units: decimal degrees
Description: <p>longitude; east is postive</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874652.rdf
Name: image_id
Units: unitless
Description: <p>image identification</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874653.rdf
Name: A
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874654.rdf
Name: B
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874655.rdf
Name: C
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874656.rdf
Name: D
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874657.rdf
Name: E
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874658.rdf
Name: F
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874659.rdf
Name: G
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874660.rdf
Name: H
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874661.rdf
Name: I
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874662.rdf
Name: J
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874663.rdf
Name: K
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874664.rdf
Name: L
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874665.rdf
Name: M
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874666.rdf
Name: N
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874667.rdf
Name: O
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874668.rdf
Name: P
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874669.rdf
Name: Q
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874670.rdf
Name: R
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874671.rdf
Name: S
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874672.rdf
Name: T
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874673.rdf
Name: U
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874674.rdf
Name: V
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874675.rdf
Name: W
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874676.rdf
Name: X
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874677.rdf
Name: Y
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874678.rdf
Name: Z
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874679.rdf
Name: AA
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874680.rdf
Name: AB
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874681.rdf
Name: AC
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/874682.rdf
Name: AD
Units: unitless
Description: <p>species code</p>
GB/NERC/BODC > British Oceanographic Data Centre, Natural Environment Research Council, United Kingdom
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
163103
https://darchive.mblwhoilibrary.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/87a6b955-c8b1-529e-89d9-3fcc218b15d9/content
download
https://doi.org/10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.525499.1
download
onLine
dataset
<p>To assess changes in abundance of invertebrates and evaluate their relationship to the cover of corals and macroalgae, data were contrasted among times in biennial increments. Each of the six sites consisted of a single transect parallel to the 7-9 m depth contour, along which photoquadrats (0.25 m^2) have been sampled since 1992. A 20-m transect was used prior to 2001 when ~17 photoquadrats were recorded on 35-mm film, but thereafter, a 40-m transect has been used along which ~40 photoquadrats were recorded using digital photography. The photoquadrats were positioned randomly along transects every year, and initially were recorded with a Nikonos V camera fitted with a 28-mm lens, strobes, and slide film (Kodachrome 64). Since 2001, digital photography with either 3.3 megapixel (Nikon Cool Pix 990) or 6.1 megapixel (Nikon D70) resolution has been employed. All cameras were mounted on a framer to hold them perpendicular to the reef.</p>
<p>To census the population density of invertebrates, photoquadrats were screened to identify tractable taxa based on size (&gt;=3-cm diameter) and appearance. These organisms were identified to class, genus, and species wherever possible, although species resolution sometimes proved unreliable. The initial screening revealed a consensus group of 30 taxa (Table S1). As these taxa varied in abundance, and many were rarely seen in photoquadrats (&lt;4 individuals/year), a subset of the initial group was created by selecting taxa that were relatively abundant (e.g., found in an average of 12% of the quadrats censused each year). This subset consisted of 14 species from 14 genera and four classes (See supplemental file: table S1), and was used to evaluate temporal trends in populations at a lower taxonomic level.</p>
<p>Organisms were counted on images enlarged by projection, or on computermonitors. Unitary organisms were easily counted, but colonial taxa were defined as individuals based on areas of autonomous tissue. Therefore, colonial taxa with several portions of unconnected tissue were scored as multiple individuals, even though they might share a common genotype through fission. Organismswere only scored if &gt;50% of their area occurred within the photoquadrat, and when they occurred in adjacent photoquadrats, were scored only once.</p>
<p>In August 2007, benthic invertebrates were counted in situ at all sites to compare abundances with those generated from photoquadrats in the same year. In situ countswere completed during the day in quadrats (1x1 m) placed in a similar manner to the photoquadrats. Although these surveys revealed greater species richness than was visible in the photoquadrats, the enumeration was restricted to those taxa that previously had been identified as tractable. To compare the two techniques, mean abundances of the invertebrates were calculated by class, standardized to a common area, and contrasted by t-tests using quadrats as statistical replicates. Where significant differences were detected between invertebrate abundances originating from in situ and photographic techniques, the mean abundance by the photoquadrat technique were expressed as a percentage of the mean value from the field counts to evaluate the bias in using photoquadrats to quantify invertebrates (See supplemental file: figure S1).</p>
Specified by the Principal Investigator(s)
<p><strong>BCO-DMO Processing Notes:</strong></p>
<p>- original file: Colvard and Edmunds Data for JEMBE 2011.xlsx<br />
- added conventional header with dataset name, PI name, version date<br />
- replaced spaces with underscores<br />
- added lat/lon columns</p>
Specified by the Principal Investigator(s)
asNeeded
7.x-1.1
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
camera
camera
PI Supplied Instrument Name: camera PI Supplied Instrument Description:1992-1999: Nikonos V film camera using Kodachrome 64 film
2000-2006: Nikon Coolpix 990 - 3.3 megapixel digital camera
2007-2008: Nikon D70 - 6.1 megapixel digital camera Instrument Name: Camera Instrument Short Name:camera Instrument Description: All types of photographic equipment including stills, video, film and digital systems. Community Standard Description: http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/L05/current/311/
Deployment: Edmunds_VINP
Edmunds_VINP
Virgin Islands National Park
shoreside
Edmunds_VINP
Peter J. Edmunds
California State University Northridge
Virgin Islands National Park
shoreside