http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/638349
eng; USA
utf8
dataset
Highest level of data collection, from a common set of sensors or instrumentation, usually within the same research project
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
2016-02-10
ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata - Part 2: Extensions for Imagery and Gridded Data
ISO 19115-2:2009(E)
Moored time-series records for chlorophyll and turbidity collected from the LB1 Mooring, LB2 Mooring, LB3 Mooring in the South Atlantic Bight (SAB) continental shelf off Long Bay from 2011-2012 (Long Bay Wintertime Bloom project)
2016-02-11
publication
2016-02-11
revision
Marine Biological Laboratory/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Library (MBLWHOI DLA)
2021-03-01
publication
https://doi.org/10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.638349.1
James Nelson
Skidaway Institute of Oceanography
principalInvestigator
Catherine Edwards
Skidaway Institute of Oceanography
principalInvestigator
Harvey E. Seim
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
principalInvestigator
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
publisher
Cite this dataset as: Nelson, J., Edwards, C., Seim, H. E. (2021) Moored time-series records for chlorophyll and turbidity collected from the LB1 Mooring, LB2 Mooring, LB3 Mooring in the South Atlantic Bight (SAB) continental shelf off Long Bay from 2011-2012 (Long Bay Wintertime Bloom project). Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2016-02-11 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. doi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.638349.1 [access date]
Moored time-series records for chlorophyll and turbidity Dataset Description: Methods and Sampling: <p>Mooring data records for optical sensors:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li><u>LB_2012_LB1 mooring (30 m depth)</u>:&nbsp; Three ECO units were deployed, one on the bottom mooring frame (S/N 738) about 0.5 m above bottom, and two on a taut-line mooring attached to the frame, nominally at 15 m depth (S/N. 736) and 5 m depth (S/N 735).&nbsp; Sampling for the three LB1 ECO units was three consecutive 1-second readings at 6-minute (360 second) intervals.</li>
<li><u>LB_2012_LB2 mooring (76 m depth)</u>:&nbsp; One ECO unit was deployed on the ADCP mooring frame about 0.5 m above bottom (S/N 739).&nbsp; This unit had an apparent electronic failure during the deployment which resulted in a distinct positive baseline shift for turbidity and negative baseline shift for chlorophyll.&nbsp; The data record was considered suspect at this point and only data from the initial deployment period (before the baseline shift) is reported.&nbsp; Sampling for the LB2 unit was three consecutive 1 second readings at 6-minute (360 second) intervals.&nbsp;</li>
<li><u>LB_2012_LB3 mooring (171 m depth)</u>:&nbsp; The ECO unit (S/N 740) was mounted about 0.5 m above the bottom on the lower portion of the Floatation Technologies AL-200 Trawl Resistant Bottom Mount frame which held a 150 kHz ADCP unit.&nbsp; Due to the longer deployment period for the LB3 instrument and internal memory limitations, sampling was set for a single 1-second sample at 6-minute (360 second) intervals (instead of three 1-sec samples for the ECO units at LB1 and LB2).&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
<p><u>Instrument calibrations and inter-comparisons:</u>&nbsp; Manufacturer supplied calibration factors for chlorophyll concentration and turbidity were employed following pre- and post-deployment checks for consistency.&nbsp; The five ECO FLNTUSB units were serviced at WET Labs and calibrated as a set in May, 2011. Instrument inter-calibrations and the factory chlorophyll calibration factors were checked by obtaining a concurrent set of measurements in the water column before deployment.&nbsp; All ECO units were mounted on a piece of angle iron that was hung on a weighted line at the same depth as the ship’s CTD/carousel system (20 m below the surface at the shelf break station LB2 to avoid surface irradiance effects on the chlorophyll fluorescence signal).&nbsp; The units were held at depth for 5 minutes (acquiring 4-5 readings).&nbsp; Niskin bottle water samples were collected about mid-point of the sampling period for chlorophyll analyses (triplicate filtered samples frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen on the ship, analyzed in the shore lab by the fluorometric method).&nbsp; After recovery of the moorings, the units were photographed to record bio-fouling.&nbsp; The four functioning ECO units (except for S/N 739) were then mounted on the ship’s CTD/carousel frame for a post-deployment set of inter-comparison measurements at two depths in the water column (35 m and 10 m), again with Niskin samples collected for chlorophyll analyses.&nbsp; For chlorophyll estimated from fluorescence, the pre- and post-deployment readings showed agreement to within 0.1-0.15 mg/m<sup>3</sup> for readings at a measured concentration of 0.4 mg/mg<sup>3</sup> (both pre- and post-deployment) and 0.2 mg/m<sup>3</sup> at a measured concentration of 1.25 mg/m<sup>3</sup>.&nbsp; For turbidity the pre-deployment check showed close agreement between all units (average 0.066 +/- 0.002 NTU at 20 m depth).&nbsp; The post-deployment check appeared to be compromised by drying of a film on the optical windows after recovery prior to the post-deployment checks.&nbsp; For the turbidity data records, baseline readings over the deployment periods (minimum values) only showed marked increase for S/N 738 deployed on the mooring frame at LB1 (increasing from about 0.4 to 1.2 NTU during the latter part of the deployment).&nbsp; For the data reported here, there has been no correction for the apparent increase in baseline readings for this instrument.&nbsp;</p>
<p><u>Wetlabs calibration sheets</u>: See Supplemental Files</p>
<p><u>Internal Clock Drift</u>:&nbsp; Time was recorded as UTC with internal clocks set to a common GPS-based reference during the pre-deployment set-up.&nbsp; Internal clock drift during deployments was checked against the reference after recovery.&nbsp; Temporal offsets at recovery ranged from -9 seconds to +528 seconds with an average offset of +359 seconds (or about the sampling interval of 360 seconds).&nbsp; Given that most events in the optical records occurred on time scales of hours to days, no clock drift correction was applied.&nbsp; Time stamps in raw files in the format MM/DD/YY HH:MM:SS were converted to the Microsoft Excel epoch convention (01/01/1900 = 1) and to the Matlab serial date number format (01/01/0000 = 1) for Excel and Matlab files respectively.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
Funding provided by NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) Award Number: OCE-1032285 Award URL: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=1032285
Funding provided by NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) Award Number: OCE-1032276 Award URL: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=1032276
completed
James Nelson
Skidaway Institute of Oceanography
(912) 598-2473
10 Ocean Science Circle
Savannah
GA
31411
USA
jim.nelson@skio.usg.edu
pointOfContact
Catherine Edwards
Skidaway Institute of Oceanography
(912) 598-2471
10 Ocean Science Circle
Savannah
GA
31411
USA
catherine.edwards@skio.uga.edu
pointOfContact
Harvey E. Seim
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(919) 962-2083
3117G Venable Hall, CB#3300
Chapel Hill
NC
27599-3300
USA
harvey_seim@unc.edu
pointOfContact
asNeeded
Dataset Version: 1
Unknown
deployment
location
depth_w
depth_n
lat
lon
date_start
time_start
date_end
time_end
yrday_utc
ISO_DateTime_UTC
comment
year
month
day
hour
min
sec
chl_avg
chl_sd
turb_avg
turb_sd
theme
None, User defined
mooring identification
brief description
depth_w
depth nominal
latitude
longitude
date_start
time_start
date end
time_end
yrday_utc
ISO_DateTime_UTC
comments
year
month of year
day of month
hour_gmt
minute_gmt
seconds_gmt
chlorophyll a
standard deviation
turbidity
featureType
BCO-DMO Standard Parameters
WETLabs ECO-FLNTU
instrument
BCO-DMO Standard Instruments
LB_2012_LB1
LB_2012_LB2
LB_2012_LB3
service
Deployment Activity
South Atlantic Bight (SAB) continental shelf off Long Bay
place
Locations
otherRestrictions
otherRestrictions
Access Constraints: none. Use Constraints: Please follow guidelines at: http://www.bco-dmo.org/terms-use Distribution liability: Under no circumstances shall BCO-DMO be liable for any direct, incidental, special, consequential, indirect, or punitive damages that result from the use of, or the inability to use, the materials in this data submission. If you are dissatisfied with any materials in this data submission your sole and exclusive remedy is to discontinue use.
Mechanisms of nutrient input at the shelf margin supporting persistent winter phytoplankton blooms downstream of the Charleston Bump
http://nccoos.org/projects/long-bay-wintertime-blooms/
Mechanisms of nutrient input at the shelf margin supporting persistent winter phytoplankton blooms downstream of the Charleston Bump
<p><strong>NSF Project Title:</strong> Mechanisms of nutrient input at the shelf margin supporting persistent winter phytoplankton blooms downstream of the Charleston Bump</p>
<p>Sustained phytoplankton blooms along the outer South Atlantic Bight (SAB) continental shelf off Long Bay are observed in winter in multi-year satellite chlorophyll imagery. This section of the shelf lies north of the "Charleston Bump" (between 32.5-33.5°N), where the Gulf Stream is often strongly deflected offshore. Due to this offshore deflection, this is not an area where nutrient input to the shelf would be enhanced by upwelling associated with Gulf Stream frontal eddies, a major mechanism of nutrient input in other parts of the SAB shelf (Lee et al., 1991). Yet prior in situ observations suggest that there is recurring input of nutrients from the upper slope to the outer shelf off Long Bay from winter to early spring. This project will investigate a fundamental aspect of physical-biological coupling in the outer shelf to upper slope region. The PIs will test the hypotheses that: 1) the persistence of winter blooms on the outer shelf off Long Bay results from repeated episodes of nutrient input and mixing which maintains nutrient-sufficient conditions for extended periods; 2) several physical mechanisms are involved, including enhanced mixing energy from the internal tide along this section of the upper slope/shelf break; 3) the relatively high nutrient, intermittently turbulent environment will favor larger bloom-forming phytoplankton. The latter could have important implications for higher trophic levels, including early life history strategies of fish that spawn along the shelf margin off Long Bay in winter to early spring.</p>
<p>This project will combine several maturing observational technologies to address the following:</p>
<p>1. What is the frequency and magnitude on on-shelf transport of nitrate from the upper slope?<br />
2. What are the mechanisms of nutrient delivery from the upper slope to the outer continental shelf zone that are operating off Long Bay under the range of hydrographic and forcing conditions encountered in winter?<br />
3. What is the 3-D structure of outer shelf hydrography and associated winter bloom features and how do these evolve through multiple nutrient input/mixing events?<br />
4. What are the rates of nitrate utilization and primary production associated with the winter blooms?<br />
5. Does the winter regime consistently favor a bloom assemblage dominated by larger diatom forms?</p>
<p>Near-continuous cross-shelf and upper slope observations will be obtained with two autonomous gliders, time-series measurements on the outer shelf and slope from a set of moored instruments (including a moored profiling system at the shelf break), and repeated cross- and along-shelf ship surveys using a towed, undulating package. Ship station work will include measurements of primary production and on-board analyses of key functional characteristics of the phytoplankton assemblage (cell forms, abundance, size and bio-volume distributions) using a microfluidics/imaging system. In combination, these systems will provide a level of spatial and temporal resolution of physical, nutrient and biological fields that could not be achieved in earlier, station-based field studies and the basis for improved understanding of physical mechanisms of recurring nutrient input to the shelf, and how the nutrient, mixing, and circulation regime in winter structures the phytoplankton community. Coastal naturalists will be engaged through a seabird survey component of the field program that will augment existing information on pelagic seabirds in winter and define their association with oceanographic features on the central South Atlantic Bight shelf and slope.</p>
<p>This project will provide a deeper understanding of shelf/slope exchange processes and how these influence shelf ecosystems, generating information that will contribute to implementation of ecosystem-based management in the region.</p>
<p>References:<br />
Lee, T. N., J. A. Yoder, and L. P. Atkinson, 1991: Gulf Stream frontal eddy influence on productivity of the southeast U.S. continental shelf. J. Geophys. Res, 96, 22191-22205.<br />
</p>
Long Bay Wintertime Bloom
largerWorkCitation
project
eng; USA
oceans
South Atlantic Bight (SAB) continental shelf off Long Bay
-78.33
-78.01322
32.85237
33.17255
2011-12-14
2012-04-04
outer South Atlantic Bight (SAB) continental shelf off Long Bay
0
BCO-DMO catalogue of parameters from Moored time-series records for chlorophyll and turbidity collected from the LB1 Mooring, LB2 Mooring, LB3 Mooring in the South Atlantic Bight (SAB) continental shelf off Long Bay from 2011-2012 (Long Bay Wintertime Bloom project)
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638391.rdf
Name: deployment
Units: unitless
Description: mooring identification
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638392.rdf
Name: location
Units: unitless
Description: description of deployment site
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638393.rdf
Name: depth_w
Units: meters
Description: mean water depth
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638394.rdf
Name: depth_n
Units: meters
Description: nominal water depth at
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638395.rdf
Name: lat
Units: decimal degrees
Description: latitude; north is positive
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638396.rdf
Name: lon
Units: decimal degrees
Description: longitude; east is positive
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638397.rdf
Name: date_start
Units: yyyy-mm-dd
Description: UTC date at beginning of data collection
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638398.rdf
Name: time_start
Units: HH:MM:SS
Description: UTC time at beginning of data collection
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638399.rdf
Name: date_end
Units: yyyy-mm-dd
Description: UTC date at end of data collection
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638400.rdf
Name: time_end
Units: HH:MM:SS
Description: UTC time at end of data collection
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638401.rdf
Name: yrday_utc
Units: day.part of day
Description: year-day: UTC day and decimal time; as 326.5 for the 326th day of the year or November 22 at 1200 hours (noon).
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638402.rdf
Name: ISO_DateTime_UTC
Units: yyyy-mm-ddTHH:MM:SSZ
Description: date/time (UTC) ISO formatted standard is based on ISO 8601:2004(E) and takes on any of the following forms: 2009-08-30T14:05:00Z (UTC time)
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638403.rdf
Name: comment
Units: unitless
Description: comments
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638404.rdf
Name: year
Units: yyyy
Description: year
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638405.rdf
Name: month
Units: mm
Description: month of year
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638406.rdf
Name: day
Units: dd
Description: UTC day of month
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638407.rdf
Name: hour
Units: HH
Description: UTC hour of day
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638408.rdf
Name: min
Units: MM
Description: UTC minutes
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638409.rdf
Name: sec
Units: SS
Description: UTC seconds
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638410.rdf
Name: chl_avg
Units: mg/m^3
Description: Chlorophyll concentration; average of 3 sequential 1 sec samples
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638411.rdf
Name: chl_sd
Units: mg/m^3
Description: Standard deviation of average of 3 sequential 1 second samples
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638412.rdf
Name: turb_avg
Units: NTU
Description: Turbidity; average of 3 sequential 1 second samples
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/638413.rdf
Name: turb_sd
Units: NTU
Description: Standard deviation of average of 3 sequential 1 second samples
GB/NERC/BODC > British Oceanographic Data Centre, Natural Environment Research Council, United Kingdom
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
16664430
https://darchive.mblwhoilibrary.org/bitstream/1912/26752/1/dataset-638349_lb2012mooringoptics__v1.tsv
download
https://doi.org/10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.638349.1
download
onLine
dataset
<p>Mooring data records for optical sensors:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li><u>LB_2012_LB1 mooring (30 m depth)</u>:&nbsp; Three ECO units were deployed, one on the bottom mooring frame (S/N 738) about 0.5 m above bottom, and two on a taut-line mooring attached to the frame, nominally at 15 m depth (S/N. 736) and 5 m depth (S/N 735).&nbsp; Sampling for the three LB1 ECO units was three consecutive 1-second readings at 6-minute (360 second) intervals.</li>
<li><u>LB_2012_LB2 mooring (76 m depth)</u>:&nbsp; One ECO unit was deployed on the ADCP mooring frame about 0.5 m above bottom (S/N 739).&nbsp; This unit had an apparent electronic failure during the deployment which resulted in a distinct positive baseline shift for turbidity and negative baseline shift for chlorophyll.&nbsp; The data record was considered suspect at this point and only data from the initial deployment period (before the baseline shift) is reported.&nbsp; Sampling for the LB2 unit was three consecutive 1 second readings at 6-minute (360 second) intervals.&nbsp;</li>
<li><u>LB_2012_LB3 mooring (171 m depth)</u>:&nbsp; The ECO unit (S/N 740) was mounted about 0.5 m above the bottom on the lower portion of the Floatation Technologies AL-200 Trawl Resistant Bottom Mount frame which held a 150 kHz ADCP unit.&nbsp; Due to the longer deployment period for the LB3 instrument and internal memory limitations, sampling was set for a single 1-second sample at 6-minute (360 second) intervals (instead of three 1-sec samples for the ECO units at LB1 and LB2).&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
<p><u>Instrument calibrations and inter-comparisons:</u>&nbsp; Manufacturer supplied calibration factors for chlorophyll concentration and turbidity were employed following pre- and post-deployment checks for consistency.&nbsp; The five ECO FLNTUSB units were serviced at WET Labs and calibrated as a set in May, 2011. Instrument inter-calibrations and the factory chlorophyll calibration factors were checked by obtaining a concurrent set of measurements in the water column before deployment.&nbsp; All ECO units were mounted on a piece of angle iron that was hung on a weighted line at the same depth as the ship’s CTD/carousel system (20 m below the surface at the shelf break station LB2 to avoid surface irradiance effects on the chlorophyll fluorescence signal).&nbsp; The units were held at depth for 5 minutes (acquiring 4-5 readings).&nbsp; Niskin bottle water samples were collected about mid-point of the sampling period for chlorophyll analyses (triplicate filtered samples frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen on the ship, analyzed in the shore lab by the fluorometric method).&nbsp; After recovery of the moorings, the units were photographed to record bio-fouling.&nbsp; The four functioning ECO units (except for S/N 739) were then mounted on the ship’s CTD/carousel frame for a post-deployment set of inter-comparison measurements at two depths in the water column (35 m and 10 m), again with Niskin samples collected for chlorophyll analyses.&nbsp; For chlorophyll estimated from fluorescence, the pre- and post-deployment readings showed agreement to within 0.1-0.15 mg/m<sup>3</sup> for readings at a measured concentration of 0.4 mg/mg<sup>3</sup> (both pre- and post-deployment) and 0.2 mg/m<sup>3</sup> at a measured concentration of 1.25 mg/m<sup>3</sup>.&nbsp; For turbidity the pre-deployment check showed close agreement between all units (average 0.066 +/- 0.002 NTU at 20 m depth).&nbsp; The post-deployment check appeared to be compromised by drying of a film on the optical windows after recovery prior to the post-deployment checks.&nbsp; For the turbidity data records, baseline readings over the deployment periods (minimum values) only showed marked increase for S/N 738 deployed on the mooring frame at LB1 (increasing from about 0.4 to 1.2 NTU during the latter part of the deployment).&nbsp; For the data reported here, there has been no correction for the apparent increase in baseline readings for this instrument.&nbsp;</p>
<p><u>Wetlabs calibration sheets</u>: See Supplemental Files</p>
<p><u>Internal Clock Drift</u>:&nbsp; Time was recorded as UTC with internal clocks set to a common GPS-based reference during the pre-deployment set-up.&nbsp; Internal clock drift during deployments was checked against the reference after recovery.&nbsp; Temporal offsets at recovery ranged from -9 seconds to +528 seconds with an average offset of +359 seconds (or about the sampling interval of 360 seconds).&nbsp; Given that most events in the optical records occurred on time scales of hours to days, no clock drift correction was applied.&nbsp; Time stamps in raw files in the format MM/DD/YY HH:MM:SS were converted to the Microsoft Excel epoch convention (01/01/1900 = 1) and to the Matlab serial date number format (01/01/0000 = 1) for Excel and Matlab files respectively.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
Specified by the Principal Investigator(s)
<p>Chlorophyll was calculated from digital counts output data as:&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Chl (ug/L) = Scale Factor * (Output Counts – Dark Counts)</p>
<p>Turbidity was calculated as:&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; NTU = Scale Factor * (Output Counts – Dark Counts)</p>
<p>Instrument-specific scale factors and dark counts for chlorophyll and turbidity provided on the WET Labs “FLNTU Characterization Sheet” were employed (see Related files and references).&nbsp; Raw data files were initially imported into Excel for calculations, then formatted for import into Matlab (including conversion of time stamps to the Matlab serial date format).</p>
<p>Examination of data records for the unit deployed at the shelf break mooring LB_2012_LB2 (S/N 740) indicated an electronic malfunction occurred at 14-Feb-2012 03:10:20.&nbsp; This resulted in a distinct positive shift in the output baseline for turbidity simultaneous with a distinct negative shift in the baseline for chlorophyll readings.&nbsp; The subsequent chlorophyll record appeared only to capture peaks of higher concentration events.&nbsp; The data subsequent to this point was considered to be bad and was not included in the record submitted to the BCO-DMO.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>BCO-DMO Processing:</strong></p>
<p>-extracted data from MatLab .mat files<br />
-added conventional header with dataset name, PI name, version date<br />
-renamed some parameters to BCO-DMO standard<br />
-added yrday_utc and&nbsp;ISO_DateTime_UTC to served view<br />
&nbsp;</p>
Specified by the Principal Investigator(s)
asNeeded
7.x-1.1
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
PI Supplied Instrument Name: Instrument Name: WETLabs ECO-FLNTU Instrument Short Name:WETLabs ECO-FLNTU Instrument Description: The ECO FLNTU is a dual-wavelength, single-angle sensor for simultaneously determining both chlorophyll fluorescence and turbidity. Community Standard Description: http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/L22/current/TOOL0215/
Deployment: LB_2012_LB1
LB_2012_LB1
LB1 Mooring
mooring
LB_2012_LB1
James Nelson
Skidaway Institute of Oceanography
Deployment: LB_2012_LB2
LB_2012_LB2
LB2 Mooring
mooring
LB_2012_LB2
James Nelson
Skidaway Institute of Oceanography
Deployment: LB_2012_LB3
LB_2012_LB3
LB3 Mooring
mooring
LB_2012_LB3
James Nelson
Skidaway Institute of Oceanography
LB1 Mooring
mooring