<div><p>The study was conducted from November 2010 through February 2011 and between November 2011 and January 2012 on shallow (~1 m below the surface at low tide, equal or shallower than 2 m at high tide), intertidal fringing reefs platforms (up to 800-m wide) along the Coral Coast (18º 13.05’S, 177º 42.97’E) of Viti Levu, Fiji’s main island. Many of the owners of traditional fishing rights along the Coral Coast have established small, customary no-take MPAs to improve and sustain their adjacent fishing grounds. The MPAs in this region are delimited by surface markings and enforced by local villagers, and they have been closed to all fishing activities since their inception (about 10 years). The only exception to this closure was a small experimental hook and line fishing research project that was conducted in the MPAs of Votua and Namada. In the non-MPAs, the main fishing targets are species of Acanthuridae (Nasinae), Epinephelidae, Labridae, Mullidae, and Lutjanidae. Permission for the research was granted by the Fijian Ministry of Education, National Heritage, Culture & Arts, Youth & Sports, which is authorized to approve field studies in Fijian waters. No animal collection or experimental procedures involving animals were conducted during the study, and no endangered species were recorded during our assessments. </p>
<p>To assess the effects of MPAs on fish assemblages, fish feeding group composition, herbivory rates, benthic cover, and coral recruit density, we compared three spatially paired MPA and adjacent, fished, areas (non-MPAs) associated with the villages of Votua, Vatu-o-lalai and Namada. Comparisons of fish assemblages inside and outside of closures are widely used for determining the effects of reserves, but it should be acknowledged that this approach does not reveal the state of an MPA relative to an undisturbed baseline. </p>
<p>The studied MPAs were established in 2002 (Vatu-o-lalai, Namada) and 2003 (Votua), and shortly after establishment, coral cover was low (~7%), and macroalgal cover was high (~35–45%) in both the MPAs and non-MPAs. All surveys and assays were conducted during the same season (austral summer) to minimize seasonal variation in sampling. The reef extends approx. 1 km from shore within each MPA and non-MPA, and all data were collected between 30 and 700 m of the shore (i.e., shoreward of the reef crest) parallel to the shoreline.</p>
<p>Benthic cover: The benthic cover of the six study sites was surveyed along 30-m long transects running parallel to the shore in each MPA and non-MPA. Along each transect, photographs were taken from 0.5 m above the bottom every 2 m along each transect (i.e., 16 photos per transect), so that consecutive photographs did not overlap. The area of each photograph was about 25 cm x 30 cm, therefore sampled area per transect was about 1.2m2. Photos were analyzed for percentage cover of corals and macrophytes using CPC with Excel extensions; the program randomly placed 20 points on each photo, and we identified the organism beneath each point. Organisms were further classified into four main categories: scleractinian corals, macroalgae, epilithic algal matrix [the EAM sensu 64], and others.</p>
<p>A total of 273 transects were conducted: 87 in Votua (48 in the MPA and 39 in the non-MPA), 94 in Vatu-o-lalai (44 in the MPA and 50 in the non-MPA), and 87 in Namada (41 in the MPA and 51 in the non-MPA). Transects were conducted from December 2010 to January 2011 and from December 2011 to January 2012, and there was no spatial overlap between transects even between different sampled year periods. On each sampling day, four to six transects were deployed on the reef parallel to the shoreline. To ensure that transects were independent and non-overlapping, they were separated by a minimum of 15 m, and the ends of each transect were marked with small surface buoys. Additionally, after conducting every 4–6 transects, the snorkeler swam approx. 25 m towards the reef crest to start a new set of transects, so sampling was widespread within each area.</p></div>
The benthic cover of six study sites
<div><p>Fiji MPA vs non-MPA corals, fishes and herbivory. This dataset contains information on the benthic cover of the six study sites.</p></div>
Benthic cover
<div><p>We used Generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) implemented under a Bayesian framework to test the effect of protection status (MPA vs. non-MPA) on the abundance and biomass of each subcategory of Herbivores and Non-herbivores at the three village sites. We used the same approach to test the effect of protection status on the number of individuals, biomass and diversity of species in the observed feeding groups. The models have a hierarchical structure where the protection status is nested within site. For abundance and biomass of Herbivores and Non-herbivores, we used a muti-response models where each subcategory is a separate response variable. Because we have several samples for the same site, transect and sampling day were included as random factors. For the richness and abundance model, we used a Poisson error structure given the nature of the data. For biomass and diversity data we used a Gaussian error structure. We performed separate analyses for Herbivores and Non-herbivores. We compared model fit against a benchmark model in which protection status was not included as a fixed effect using the Deviance information criterion (DIC). The MCMC used to sample the posterior distributions of effect sizes ran for 106 iterations and was sampled every 100 iterations (thinning = 100) after burn-in (5×105). We considered effect size significant when the 95% credible interval of the estimated posterior distributions of parameters did not include 0. We monitored chain mixing by checking the effective sample sizes (ESS) for fixed and random effects. We used inverse gamma priors for variance components. Exploratory analyses indicate that estimates for fixed effects were robust to prior selection. Outliers were removed prior to the GLMM analyses to reduce overdispersion, although analyses with and without the outliers yielded qualitatively similar results. We used the R package MCMCGLMM for all analyses based on GLMMs.</p>
<p>We compared benthic cover between MPAs and non-MPAs using three-way ANOVA, with village site (Votua, Vatu-o-lalai, and Namada), status (MPA and non-MPA) and year (2010/2011 and 2011/2012) as fixed factors. Separate ANOVAs were used to compare the percentage cover of four different substratum types (scleractinian corals, macroalgae, epilithic algal turfs and others). Benthic cover data were arcsine-transformed, and fish density and biomass data were log-transformed to meet assumptions of normality (frequency histograms). When differences were significant, the test was followed by specific planned comparisons between paired treatments (MPA vs non-MPA) at each village site. P-values were adjusted with the Holm-Sídák method, in which the adjusted p-value is equal to , where k refers to the number of comparisons.</p>
<p>The rates of grazing and browsing and the density of coral recruits were compared between MPAs and adjacent non-MPAs using two-way ANOVA with status (MPA and non-MPA) and village site (Votua, Vatu-o-lalai, and Namada) as fixed factors. Separate analyses were used to compare (1) parrotfish grazing rates, (2) macroalgal browsing rates, and (3) the number of coral recruits per quadrat (log-transformed). Holm-Sídák-adjusted paired comparisons were also used when differences were significant. ANOVAs for benthic cover, grazing and browsing rates, and density of coral recruits, as well as all graph plots in this manuscript, were programmed in R 3.0.1 using base package functions.</p></div>
674104
Benthic cover
2017-01-06T19:05:04-05:00
2017-01-06T19:05:04-05:00
2023-07-07T16:10:26-04:00
urn:bcodmo:dataset:674104
Benthic cover data from six sites in Viti Levu, Fiji from 2010-2012 (Killer Seaweeds project)
Benthic cover data from six sites in Viti Levu, Fiji from 2010-2012 (Killer Seaweeds project)
false
Hay, M. (2017) Benthic cover data from six sites in Viti Levu, Fiji from 2010-2012 (Killer Seaweeds project). Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2017-01-06 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. doi:10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.674104.1 [access date]
false
1
10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.674104.1
false
2017-01-06
Datapackage.json
Frictionless Data Package
https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/674104/datapackage.json
application/vnd.datapackage+json
PDF
https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/674104/Dataset_description.pdf
application/pdf
ISO 19115-2 (NOAA Profile)
https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/674104/iso
application/xml
http://www.isotc211.org/2005/gmd-noaa
Dublin Core
https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/674104/dublin-core
application/xml
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
674104
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/674104
2010 - 2012
2010
2010
2012
2012
VIEW TABLE
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_674104.htmlTable
text/html
SUBSET DATA
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_674104.html
text/html
CSV
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_674104.csv
text/csv
TSV
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_674104.tsv
text/tsv
MATLAB
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_674104.mat
text/x-matlab
netCDF
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_674104.nc
application/x-netcdf