Distribution of benthic invertebrates along the East Coast, USA, ranging from latitudes 38.61283 to 29.753272.

Website: https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/719556
Data Type: experimental
Version: 1
Version Date: 2017-11-17

Project
» Biogeography of a marine defensive microbial symbiont: relative importance of host defense vs. abiotic factors (BiogeogDefensiveSymb)
ContributorsAffiliationRole
Lopanik, NicoleGeorgia Institute of Technology (GA Tech)Principal Investigator
Lim-Fong, GraceRandolph-Macon CollegeCo-Principal Investigator
Rauch, ShannonWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO)BCO-DMO Data Manager

Abstract
This dataset includes the distribution of benthic invertebrates along the East Coast, USA, ranging from latitudes 38.61283 to 29.753272.


Coverage

Spatial Extent: N:38.61283 E:-75.072524 S:29.753272 W:-81.421
Temporal Extent: 2015-03-16 - 2016-06-21

Dataset Description

Distribution of benthic invertebrates along the East Coast, USA from latitudes 38.61283 to 29.753272.


Methods & Sampling

Samples were collected by hand using a 15x15 cm grid placed randomly on submerged area of floating dock, and identified by eye. For some colonial organisms (sponges, hydroids, tunicates, bryozoans), enumeration was challenging. Zeros indicate no animals in that group were found in that sample.

Temperature was measured with a digital thermometer, and salinity with a refractometer at the time of collection.


Data Processing Description

We have analyzed the proportions at differing latitudes and performed regression analysis with various factors (latitude, longitude, temperature, salinity) using SPSS Statistics 24.

BCO-DMO Processing:
- copied date, location name, location code, lat, lon, temp, and sal to each relevant row (was only included the first row for each sample set);
- created location_descrip column for more detailed location place name;
- modified parameter names;
- moved "Total" to the "Grid" column;
- removed commas and apostrophes from place names; replaced spaces with underscores;
- replaced blanks with "nd" (no data).


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Data Files

File
invert_dist.csv
(Comma Separated Values (.csv), 64.17 KB)
MD5:13066356a8522518992f187ccf5fb2f7
Primary data file for dataset ID 719556

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Parameters

ParameterDescriptionUnits
dateDate of collection, formatted as mm/dd/yyyy unitless
locationLocation samples collected unitless
location_descripSpecific area within location where samples were collected unitless
location_codeLocation code unitless
LatitudeLatitude of location decimal degrees
LongitudeLongitude of location decimal degrees
tempWater temperature degrees Celsius
salinityWater salinity parts per thousand
grid_numSampling effort replicate unitless
sponge_randomRandom sponge count unitless
sponge_orangeOrange sponge count unitless
sponge_yellowYellow sponge count unitless
sponge_purp_grayPurple/gray sponge count unitless
sponge_pinkPink sponge count unitless
sponge_greenGreen sponge count unitless
spong_orange_encrOrange encr. sponge count unitless
AnemoneAnemone count unitless
hydroidHydroid count unitless
hydroid_tubulariaHydroid (tubularia) count unitless
crabCrab count unitless
barnacleBarnacle count unitless
oysterOyster count unitless
musselMussel count unitless
snailSnail count unitless
nudibranchNudibranch count unitless
limpetLimpet count unitless
worm_redRed worm count unitless
worm_greenGreen worm count unitless
tubewormTubeworm count unitless
ragwormRagworm count unitless
tunicate_orangeOrange tunicate count unitless
tunicate_blackBlack tunicate count unitless
molgulaMolgula count unitless
styelaStyela count unitless
ecteinascidia_like_tunicateEcteinascidia-like tunicate count unitless
white_tunicate_clavelinaWhite tunicate/clavelina count unitless
clear_tunicateClear tunicate count unitless
stalked_tunicateStalked tunicate count unitless
encrusting_bryozoanEncrusting bryozoan count unitless
bugula_spBugula sp. count unitless
B_neritinaB. neritina count unitless
total_countTotal count unitless
sponge_totTotal sponge count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
anemone_totTotal anemone count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
hydroid_totTotal hydroid count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
barnacle_totTotal barnacle count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
oyster_totTotal oyster count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
mussel_totTotal mussel count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
other_mollusk_totTotal other mollusk count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
worm_totTotal worm count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
colonial_tun_totTotal colonial tunicate count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
solitary_tun_totTotal solitary tunicate count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
encr_bry_totTotal encrusting bryozoan count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
B_stolon_totTotal B. stolon count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
B_neritina_totTotal B. neritina count (counts summed by taxonomic grouping) unitless
totalTotal of counts summed by taxonomic grouping unitless
total_minus_bryTotal of counts summed by taxonomic grouping minus the bryozoans unitless
sponge_propsponge_tot as a proportion unitless
anemone_propanemone_tot as a proportion unitless
hydroid_prophydroid_tot as a proportion unitless
barnacle_propbarnacle_tot as a proportion unitless
oyster_propoyster_tot as a proportion unitless
mussel_propmussel_tot as a proportion unitless
other_mollusk_propother_mullusk_tot as a proportion unitless
worm_propworm_tot as a proportion unitless
colonial_tun_propcolonial_tun_tot as a proportion unitless
solitary_tun_propsolitary_tun_tot as a proportion unitless
encr_bry_propencr_bry_tot as a proportion unitless
B_stolon_propB_stolon_tot as a proportion unitless
B_neritina_propB_neritina_tot as a proportion unitless
total_propTotal of proportions unitless
sponge_minus_bry_propSponge proportion after removing bryozoan counts unitless
anemone_minus_bry_propAnemone proportion after removing bryozoan counts unitless
hydroid_minus_bry_propHydroid proportion after removing bryozoan counts unitless
barnacle_minus_bry_propBarnacle proportion after removing bryozoan counts unitless
mollusks_minus_bry_propMollusks proportion after removing bryozoan counts unitless
worm_minus_bry_propWorm proportion after removing bryozoan counts unitless
tunicates_minus_bry_propTunicates proportion after removing bryozoan counts unitless
total_minus_bry_propTotal of proportions after removing bryozoan counts unitless


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Instruments

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Generic Instrument Name
Refractometer
Generic Instrument Description
A refractometer is a laboratory or field device for the measurement of an index of refraction (refractometry). The index of refraction is calculated from Snell's law and can be calculated from the composition of the material using the Gladstone-Dale relation. In optics the refractive index (or index of refraction) n of a substance (optical medium) is a dimensionless number that describes how light, or any other radiation, propagates through that medium.

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Generic Instrument Name
digital thermometer
Generic Instrument Description
An instrument that measures temperature digitally.


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Project Information

Biogeography of a marine defensive microbial symbiont: relative importance of host defense vs. abiotic factors (BiogeogDefensiveSymb)

Coverage: Western Atlantic coast, ranging from latitudes 38.61283 to 29.753272


Recent research has shown that microorganisms can be very important to their eukaryotic hosts, by providing nutrition or contributing to host defense against enemies, such as pathogens or predators. In many cases, however, hosting a bacterial symbiont imposes a physiological cost on the host organism, resulting in reduced growth or reproduction in the presence of the symbiont. Further, these costs may be more pronounced in some habitats than others, causing natural selection to act in eliminating symbiont-containing hosts from the population. In this project, the investigators are studying the relationship between the marine bryozoan invertebrate, Bugula neritina, and its uncultured symbiont. The symbiont produces natural products with activity against cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and HIV. Interestingly, these compounds also are distasteful and protect larvae from predators, indicating that this symbiotic relationship is defensive in nature. Along the East Coast of the US, the investigators have found a much higher proportion of individuals that have the defensive symbiont at lower latitudes, while the symbiont is absent in individuals collected at higher latitudes. This pattern is consistent with the theory that higher predation pressure exists at lower latitudes. Other environmental factors, such as temperature, can also vary over a wide geographical area, and may also play a role in influencing the relationship. In this project, the investigators will evaluate the ecological and environmental parameters that influence the distribution of a defensive symbiont, including predation pressure and temperature. Defensive symbionts represent another level of ecological complexity, and likely play an important role in structuring marine communities. This study will provide insight into how environmental factors can influence host-symbiont interactions and drive partner co-evolution. Furthermore, the bioactive products have pharmaceutical potential, and understanding how environmental factors influence the relationship between B. neritina and its symbiont may improve bioprospecting for novel compounds that could be developed into drugs.

In this research, the investigators will determine the ecological and environmental parameters that influence the distribution of a defensive symbiont in the marine bryozoan, Bugula neritina. The goal of this research is to determine the mechanism that results in the defensive endosymbiont being restricted to hosts that inhabit lower latitudes. This pattern of symbiont distribution could be the result of differing levels of costs and benefits at different latitudes: where predation pressure is low, the costs of hosting the symbiont outweigh the benefits, and aposymbiotic individuals outcompete their symbiotic conspecifics. In areas of higher predation, the defensive benefit outweighs the cost, and symbiotic individuals have higher survival rates than their undefended, aposymbiotic conspecifics. An alternative, but not mutually exclusive hypothesis, is that symbiont growth is inhibited at higher latitudes, where it is not as beneficial, and growth is induced in areas of higher predation. Specific goals are to determine if (1) a biogeographical cline in predation pressure corresponds to a gradient of symbiont frequency associating with the host, (2) symbiotic hosts have a higher fitness at low latitudes, and aposymbiotic hosts have a higher fitness at high latitudes, and (3) symbiont growth is promoted at low latitudes and inhibited at high latitudes. A combination of field and laboratory-based experiments will be conducted using ecological and molecular biology techniques. Bioactive compounds produced by symbionts of marine invertebrates can mediate multi-trophic interactions and potentially influence benthic community structure. There has been almost no research, however, on how ecological and environmental parameters influence the distribution of marine defensive endosymbionts.

Related Reference:

Linneman J, Paulus D, Lim-Fong G, Lopanik NB (2014) Latitudinal Variation of a Defensive Symbiosis in the Bugula neritina (Bryozoa) Sibling Species Complex. PLoS ONE 9(10): e108783. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108783



[ table of contents | back to top ]

Funding

Funding SourceAward
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE)

[ table of contents | back to top ]