http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/726744
eng; USA
utf8
dataset
Highest level of data collection, from a common set of sensors or instrumentation, usually within the same research project
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
2018-02-13
ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata - Part 2: Extensions for Imagery and Gridded Data
ISO 19115-2:2009(E)
Data generated from the manipulative experiments in Moorea, French Polynesia from February-August 2007 (CDD_in_Reef_Fish project)
2017-10-05
publication
2017-10-05
revision
Marine Biological Laboratory/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Library (MBLWHOI DLA)
2021-06-29
publication
https://doi.org/10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.726744.1
Shane Geange
Victoria University of Wellington
principalInvestigator
Adrian Stier
University of California-Santa Barbara
principalInvestigator
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
publisher
Cite this dataset as: Geange, S., Stier, A. (2021) Data generated from the manipulative experiments in Moorea, French Polynesia from February-August 2007 (CDD_in_Reef_Fish project). Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2017-10-05 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. doi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.726744.1 [access date]
This dataset is from a manipulative experiment investigating intracohort priority effects between two competing reef fishes (Thalassoma hardwicke and T. quinquevittatum). Dataset Description: <p>This dataset is from a manipulative experiment investigating intracohort priority effects between two competing reef fishes (<em>Thalassoma hardwicke </em>and<em> T. quinquevittatum</em>). This particular dataset contains all data generated from the manipulative experiments within this study; Experiment 1 focuses on interspecific competition, whereas Experiment 2 focuses on intraspecific competition. For additional data please see files listed in Related Datasets.</p>
<p><strong>Related Datasets</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Geange_and_Stier_2009 Order of Arrival:&nbsp;https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/726744 (current page)</li>
<li>Geange_and_Stier_2009 Order of Arrival Size: https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/726781</li>
<li>Geange_and_Stier_2009 Order of Arrival Background Community:&nbsp;https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/726766</li>
</ul> Methods and Sampling: <p>The study was conducted in the northern lagoon of Moorea, French Polynesia (17 30’S, 149 50’W)&nbsp;at the Gump Biological Research Station between February and August 2007, using a grid of 28 live-coral patch reefs in water 2 to 4 meters deep.&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Experimental Design and Execution</strong><br />
To test for priority effects, we experimentally manipulated the sequence and timing of arrival of T. hardwicke and T. quinquevittatum onto reefs. We used recent settlers (13.8 mm SL; SD = 2.3; approximately two weeks post-settlement) captured from reefs roughly 4 km from the study site. All captured fish were held in tanks with running seawater for 6–12 h, then individually tagged with different colors of Visible Implant Elastomer forward of the caudal peduncle. After tagging, we returned fish to aerated aquaria for 6-12 hr before measuring them to the nearest 0.1 mm SL, and deploying them in the field. We used newly collected and tagged fish in two experiments. Experiment 1 examined interspecific priority effects between T. hardwicke and T. quinquevittatum. Experiment 2 examined intraspecific priority effects within T. hardwicke.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Experiment 1: Interspecific Priority Effects between T. hardwicke and T. quinquevittatum</strong><br />
We experimentally manipulated the sequence and timing of the arrival of T. hardwicke and T. quinquevittatum settlers; one portion of this experiment was designed to quantify effects of T. hardwicke (the prior resident) on T. quinquevittatum (the focal species); the other was designed to test the effects of T. quinquevittatum (as the prior resident) on T. hardwicke (as the focal species). For both cases, we simulated settlement pulses by introducing three fish of the focal species onto reefs where three tagged fish of the prior resident were either absent; had been introduced 12-days earlier than, 5-days earlier than, or simultaneously with (0-days) the focal species. All fish were collected and tagged in the 24 hours preceding their deployment in the field. We ran the experiment in two temporal blocks (11 to 30 April and 2 to 21 May), randomly assigning treatments to reefs, and fish to treatments, yielding eight replicates (four in each temporal block) for each of our seven treatments: 1) T. hardwicke without T. quinquevittatum; 2) T. hardwicke and T. quinquevittatum introduced simultaneously; 3) T. hardwicke with T. quinquevittatum introduced 5-days previously; 4) T. hardwicke with T. quinquevittatum introduced 12-days previously; 5) T. quinquevittatum without T. hardwicke; 6) T. quinquevittatum with T. hardwicke introduced 5-days previously, and 7) T. quinquevittatum with T. hardwicke introduced 12 days previously.&nbsp; Note that treatment 2 served as the simultaneous arrival treatment for both species. For each experimental run, we size matched focal individuals and prior residents, so that all fish were the same size at the time they were added to reefs. Size differences between prior residents and focal individuals were then a function of the length of prior residency (e.g., growth advantage conferred upon 12-day prior residents relative to 0-day prior residents was 12 days). Because recently settled fish often experience high rates of mortality, we initially introduced 6 prior residents to reefs in the 12-day and 5-day treatments. Prior to introducing focal fish to these treatments, we haphazardly removed excess residents when there were more than three residents (18 instances out of 32 reefs), and pressed residents at the same time as focal individuals were added when there were less than three residents (6 instances out of 32). We surveyed reefs twice daily (approximately 8 am and 4 pm) for seven days after we introduced focal individuals.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Experiment 2: Intraspecific Priority Effects between T. hardwicke Individuals</strong><br />
We used a similar experimental design to examine intraspecific priority effects for T. hardwicke (i.e., T. hardwicke recruits served as both the focal and resident individuals). Because the intraspecific design had four instead of seven treatments, all seven replicates of the four treatments were conducted together once (6 July to 25 July).<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Behavioural Observations</strong><br />
To help elucidate the mechanisms driving priority effects we conducted five-minute behavioral observations at the time we added focal individuals to reefs. After allowing fish to acclimate to the observer’s presence for approximately three minutes, behavioral observations were conducted at a distance of approximately two meters from the reef. We recorded three response variables: 1) The number of chases between focal individuals and both prior residents and the background community; 2) The number of fin bites inflicted during chases; and 3) Time spent inside Pocillopora by focal individuals.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
Funding provided by NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) Award Number: OCE-0242312 Award URL: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/show-award?AWD_ID=0242312
completed
Shane Geange
Victoria University of Wellington
+64-27-818-1325
Wellington
New Zealand
shane_wg@yahoo.co.nz
pointOfContact
Adrian Stier
University of California-Santa Barbara
805-893-5467
Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology University of California, Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
CA
93106-9620
United States
adrian.stier@lifesci.ucsb.edu
pointOfContact
asNeeded
Dataset Version: 1
Unknown
run
reef
priority
focal
competitor
substrate
chase
finbite
poc
social
survival
tanks
theme
None, User defined
experiment id
site
treatment
species scientific name (binomial)
count
No BCO-DMO term
featureType
BCO-DMO Standard Parameters
Aquarium
instrument
BCO-DMO Standard Instruments
Osenberg_et_al_Moorea
service
Deployment Activity
Moorea, French Polynesia (-17.48 degrees S, -149.82 degrees W)
place
Locations
otherRestrictions
otherRestrictions
Access Constraints: none. Use Constraints: Please follow guidelines at: http://www.bco-dmo.org/terms-use Distribution liability: Under no circumstances shall BCO-DMO be liable for any direct, incidental, special, consequential, indirect, or punitive damages that result from the use of, or the inability to use, the materials in this data submission. If you are dissatisfied with any materials in this data submission your sole and exclusive remedy is to discontinue use.
Cryptic density dependence: the effects of spatial, ontogenetic, and individual variation in reef fish
https://osprey.bco-dmo.org/project/540423
Cryptic density dependence: the effects of spatial, ontogenetic, and individual variation in reef fish
<p><em>Description from NSF award abstract:</em><br />
Ecologists have long been interested in the factors that drive spatial and temporal variability in population density and structure. In marine reef systems, attention has focused on the role of settlement-the transition of pelagic larvae to a benthic stage-and on density-dependent processes affecting recently settled juveniles. Recent data suggest that co-variance in settlement and subsequent density-dependent survival can obscure the patterns of density dependence at larger scales, a phenomenon called cryptic density dependence. This research will explore the mechanisms that underlie the spatial covariance of settlement and site quality - a process that has received little attention in the standard paradigm. These mechanistic studies of cryptic density dependence will facilitate the development of new frameworks for fish population dynamics that incorporate larval ecology, habitat quality, density dependence, life history, and the patterns and implications of spatial covariance among these factors. More generally, the work provides a specific empirical context, and a general theoretical treatment, of cryptic heterogeneity (hidden individual variation in demographic rates).</p>
<p><strong>Note: </strong>Drs. Craig W. Osenberg and Ben Bolker were at the University of Florida at the time the NSF award was granted. Dr. Osenberg moved to the University of Georgia during the summer of 2014 (<a href="http://www.bco-dmo.org/person/540414" target="_blank">current contact information</a>). Dr. Bolker moved to McMaster University in 2010 (<a href="http://www.bco-dmo.org/person/540425" target="_blank">current contact information</a>).</p>
CDD_in_Reef_Fish
largerWorkCitation
project
eng; USA
oceans
Moorea, French Polynesia (-17.48 degrees S, -149.82 degrees W)
-149.8333333
-149.8333333
-17.5
-17.5
2007-03-01
2007-08-31
Moorea, French Polynesia (-17.48, -149.82)
0
BCO-DMO catalogue of parameters from Data generated from the manipulative experiments in Moorea, French Polynesia from February-August 2007 (CDD_in_Reef_Fish project)
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/726754.rdf
Name: run
Units: unitless
Description: <p>experimental run identifier</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/726755.rdf
Name: reef
Units: unitless
Description: <p>unique identifier for each reef in experimental array</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/726756.rdf
Name: priority
Units: unitless
Description: <p>Treatment level for priority effect (Absent; 0-days; 5-days; 12-days; Sim (i.e. “Simultaneously))</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/726757.rdf
Name: focal
Units: unitless
Description: <p>Genus and species of the focal species (T.(Thalassoma) hardwicke or T. (Thallasoma) quinquevittatum)</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/726758.rdf
Name: competitor
Units: unitless
Description: <p>Genus and species of the competitor species (T.(Thalassoma) hardwicke or T. (Thallasoma) quinquevittatum)</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/726759.rdf
Name: substrate
Units: unitless
Description: <p>the number of substrate bites by focal individuals</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/726760.rdf
Name: chase
Units: unitless
Description: <p>the number of chases between other fishes and the focal individual</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/726761.rdf
Name: finbite
Units: unitless
Description: <p>the number of fin bites inflicted upon the focal individual</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/726762.rdf
Name: poc
Units: unitless (percent)
Description: <p>percent of time spent inside Pocillopora by the focal individuals</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/726763.rdf
Name: social
Units: unitless (percent)
Description: <p>percent of time (in five minutes) spent swimming with- or near a conspecific individual</p>
http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/726764.rdf
Name: survival
Units: unitless
Description: <p>proportional survival of focal individuals at end of experiment</p>
GB/NERC/BODC > British Oceanographic Data Centre, Natural Environment Research Council, United Kingdom
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
10962
https://darchive.mblwhoilibrary.org/bitstream/1912/27292/1/dataset-726744_geangeandstier2009-order-arrival__v1.tsv
download
https://doi.org/10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.726744.1
download
onLine
dataset
<p>The study was conducted in the northern lagoon of Moorea, French Polynesia (17 30’S, 149 50’W)&nbsp;at the Gump Biological Research Station between February and August 2007, using a grid of 28 live-coral patch reefs in water 2 to 4 meters deep.&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Experimental Design and Execution</strong><br />
To test for priority effects, we experimentally manipulated the sequence and timing of arrival of T. hardwicke and T. quinquevittatum onto reefs. We used recent settlers (13.8 mm SL; SD = 2.3; approximately two weeks post-settlement) captured from reefs roughly 4 km from the study site. All captured fish were held in tanks with running seawater for 6–12 h, then individually tagged with different colors of Visible Implant Elastomer forward of the caudal peduncle. After tagging, we returned fish to aerated aquaria for 6-12 hr before measuring them to the nearest 0.1 mm SL, and deploying them in the field. We used newly collected and tagged fish in two experiments. Experiment 1 examined interspecific priority effects between T. hardwicke and T. quinquevittatum. Experiment 2 examined intraspecific priority effects within T. hardwicke.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Experiment 1: Interspecific Priority Effects between T. hardwicke and T. quinquevittatum</strong><br />
We experimentally manipulated the sequence and timing of the arrival of T. hardwicke and T. quinquevittatum settlers; one portion of this experiment was designed to quantify effects of T. hardwicke (the prior resident) on T. quinquevittatum (the focal species); the other was designed to test the effects of T. quinquevittatum (as the prior resident) on T. hardwicke (as the focal species). For both cases, we simulated settlement pulses by introducing three fish of the focal species onto reefs where three tagged fish of the prior resident were either absent; had been introduced 12-days earlier than, 5-days earlier than, or simultaneously with (0-days) the focal species. All fish were collected and tagged in the 24 hours preceding their deployment in the field. We ran the experiment in two temporal blocks (11 to 30 April and 2 to 21 May), randomly assigning treatments to reefs, and fish to treatments, yielding eight replicates (four in each temporal block) for each of our seven treatments: 1) T. hardwicke without T. quinquevittatum; 2) T. hardwicke and T. quinquevittatum introduced simultaneously; 3) T. hardwicke with T. quinquevittatum introduced 5-days previously; 4) T. hardwicke with T. quinquevittatum introduced 12-days previously; 5) T. quinquevittatum without T. hardwicke; 6) T. quinquevittatum with T. hardwicke introduced 5-days previously, and 7) T. quinquevittatum with T. hardwicke introduced 12 days previously.&nbsp; Note that treatment 2 served as the simultaneous arrival treatment for both species. For each experimental run, we size matched focal individuals and prior residents, so that all fish were the same size at the time they were added to reefs. Size differences between prior residents and focal individuals were then a function of the length of prior residency (e.g., growth advantage conferred upon 12-day prior residents relative to 0-day prior residents was 12 days). Because recently settled fish often experience high rates of mortality, we initially introduced 6 prior residents to reefs in the 12-day and 5-day treatments. Prior to introducing focal fish to these treatments, we haphazardly removed excess residents when there were more than three residents (18 instances out of 32 reefs), and pressed residents at the same time as focal individuals were added when there were less than three residents (6 instances out of 32). We surveyed reefs twice daily (approximately 8 am and 4 pm) for seven days after we introduced focal individuals.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Experiment 2: Intraspecific Priority Effects between T. hardwicke Individuals</strong><br />
We used a similar experimental design to examine intraspecific priority effects for T. hardwicke (i.e., T. hardwicke recruits served as both the focal and resident individuals). Because the intraspecific design had four instead of seven treatments, all seven replicates of the four treatments were conducted together once (6 July to 25 July).<br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>Behavioural Observations</strong><br />
To help elucidate the mechanisms driving priority effects we conducted five-minute behavioral observations at the time we added focal individuals to reefs. After allowing fish to acclimate to the observer’s presence for approximately three minutes, behavioral observations were conducted at a distance of approximately two meters from the reef. We recorded three response variables: 1) The number of chases between focal individuals and both prior residents and the background community; 2) The number of fin bites inflicted during chases; and 3) Time spent inside Pocillopora by focal individuals.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
Specified by the Principal Investigator(s)
<p>This is raw data.</p>
<p><strong>BCO-DMO Processing:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>added conventional header with dataset name, PI name, version date</li>
<li>modified parameter names to conform with BCO-DMO naming conventions</li>
</ul>
Specified by the Principal Investigator(s)
asNeeded
7.x-1.1
Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO)
Unavailable
508-289-2009
WHOI MS#36
Woods Hole
MA
02543
USA
info@bco-dmo.org
http://www.bco-dmo.org
Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm
For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided.
pointOfContact
tanks
tanks
PI Supplied Instrument Name: tanks PI Supplied Instrument Description:All captured fish were held in tanks with running seawater for 6–12 h, then individually tagged with different colors of Visible Implant Elastomer forward of the caudal peduncle. Instrument Name: Aquarium Instrument Short Name:Aquarium Instrument Description: Aquarium - a vivarium consisting of at least one transparent side in which water-dwelling plants or animals are kept
Deployment: Osenberg_et_al_Moorea
Osenberg_et_al_Moorea
Osenberg et al Moorea
Osenberg_et_al_Moorea
Craig Osenberg
University of Georgia
Osenberg et al Moorea