{"@context":{"content":"http:\/\/purl.org\/rss\/1.0\/modules\/content\/","dc":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/","foaf":"http:\/\/xmlns.com\/foaf\/0.1\/","og":"http:\/\/ogp.me\/ns#","rdfs":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/01\/rdf-schema#","sioc":"http:\/\/rdfs.org\/sioc\/ns#","sioct":"http:\/\/rdfs.org\/sioc\/types#","skos":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2004\/02\/skos\/core#","xsd":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2001\/XMLSchema#","owl":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2002\/07\/owl#","rdf":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/02\/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","rss":"http:\/\/purl.org\/rss\/1.0\/","site":"https:\/\/www.bco-dmo.org\/ns#","odo":"http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/","emo":"http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/entity-matching#","bibo":"http:\/\/purl.org\/ontology\/bibo\/","crypto":"http:\/\/id.loc.gov\/vocabulary\/preservation\/cryptographicHashFunctions\/","bcodmo":"http:\/\/lod.bco-dmo.org\/id\/","tw":"http:\/\/tw.rpi.edu\/schema\/","dcat":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/dcat#","time":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2006\/time#","geo":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2003\/01\/geo\/wgs84_pos#","geosparql":"http:\/\/www.opengis.net\/ont\/geosparql#","sf":"http:\/\/www.opengis.net\/ont\/sf#","void":"http:\/\/rdfs.org\/ns\/void#","sd":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/sparql-service-description#","dctype":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/dcmitype\/","prov":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/prov#","schema":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","geolink":"http:\/\/schema.geolink.org\/1.0\/base\/main#","spdx":"http:\/\/spdx.org\/rdf\/terms#","bcodmo_vocab":"http:\/\/schema.bco-dmo.org\/"},"@id":"http:\/\/lod.bco-dmo.org\/id\/dataset\/750513#graph","@graph":[{"http:\/\/lod.bco-dmo.org\/id\/dataset\/750513":{"@id":"http:\/\/lod.bco-dmo.org\/id\/dataset\/750513","@type":["http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/DeploymentDatasetCollection","http:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/dcat#Dataset","http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/Dataset"],"http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/hasAcquisitionDescription":[{"@value":"
Sites were treated as statistical replicates, and abundance and cover data from photoquadrats were averaged by site to describe community structure with 6 replicates y-1<\/sup>.\u00a0 To evaluate the implications of increasing the same size (no. of quadrats) from ~ 18 to ~ 40 in 2000, multivariate community structure (scleractinians by species, octocorals by genus, CTB, and macroalgae) was compared between the initial 18 quadrats and the additional quadrats using PERMANOVA.\u00a0 This analysis was conducted with the 2000 census, and data were standardized (z-scores) to address their measurement on different scales, and fourth-root transformed prior to calculating resemblance matrices using Bray Curtis similarities.\u00a0 Univariate contrasts were also conducted between the initial 18 quadrats and the additional quadrats using t-tests with Bonferroni-adjusted alpha values to reduce the risks of Type I errors.\u00a0 Changes over time in the abundance of octocorals and scleractinians are displayed using line graphs showing mean \u00b1 SE for untransformed values.\u00a0 Based on the taxonomic resolution described above, community structure was characterized by site using Shannon-Wiener Diversity (H\u00b4), Pielou\u2019s Evenness (J\u00b4), and richness (number of taxa); in this application, these metrics refer to alpha diversity.\u00a0 For scleractinians, H\u00b4 and J\u00b4 were calculated using percentage cover as a measure of abundance, and for octocorals, abundance was evaluated by density (colonies 0.25 m-2<\/sup>).<\/p>\n PERMANOVA was used to test for changes in community structure among years (repeated measure) and sites (random effect) based on four assemblages: (1) the whole community (scleractinians, octocorals, macroalgae, and CTB), (2) octocorals by genus, (3) scleractinians by species, and (4) octocorals and scleractinians combined, to genus or species, respectively.\u00a0 The same design was used in a univariate mode to test for time and site effects using H\u00b4, J\u00b4, and richness as dependent variables.\u00a0 Comparisons of scleractinian and octocoral community structure over time were conducted using PERMANOVAs of resemblance matrices composed of Bray Curtis similarities.\u00a0 Analyses were repeated for scleractinians and octocorals combined, and then for each separately.\u00a0 In the combined scleractinian and octocoral analysis, data were normalized and square root transformed.\u00a0 Analyses of scleractinians alone, or octocorals alone, used square root or fourth root transformed data, respectively.\u00a0 Significance was tested in a permutational framework (999 permutations) and evaluated through Pseudo-F and the probability of obtaining the statistic values by chance alone (p<\/em>perm<\/sub>).<\/p>\n To detect years between which significant changes in community structure occurred, planned contrasts were used between sequential years, and unplanned contrasts were used to compare sites.\u00a0 The same techniques were used for H\u00b4, J\u00b4, and richness, except values were square-root transformed, and similarities determined using Euclidian Distance.\u00a0 To evaluate rates of change in dependent variables over time, data were tested for temporal autocorrelation using the Durbin-Watson statistic.\u00a0 Model I regressions were used where there was no autocorrelation, and where autocorrelation was detected, Model I linear regressions were adjusted using the Cochrane-Orcutt model.<\/p>\n Multivariate variation in community structure was described using MDS applied to the community structure averaged across sites within years, and described at two resolutions: (1) by functional group consisting of scleractinians (summed among taxa), octocorals (summed among genera), and macroalgae,and CTB, and (2) scleractinians by species, octocorals by genus, macroalgae and CTB.\u00a0 Data were standardized (z-scores) to address their measurement on different scales, and fourth-root transformed prior to calculating resemblance matrices using Bray Curtis similarities.\u00a0 MDS ordinations were prepared using 100 restarts until stress stabilized, and similarity contours were applied where they enhanced the interpretation of groupings.\u00a0 Principle coordinate analyses (PCO) were prepared using the same resemblance matrices, and were overlaid with vectors displaying Spearman correlations between dependent variables and PCO1 and PCO2.\u00a0 The length (scaled to \u2264 1) of the vectors shows the influence of dependent variables in causing separation along each axis.<\/p>\n The BEST procedure in PRIMER and DISTLM in PERMANOVA+ were used evaluate the extent to which community structure was associated with physical conditions.\u00a0 The BEST procedure is based on rank correlations (\uf072) between the resemblance matrix defining the community structure and a suite of resemblance matrices defining physical conditions.\u00a0 Where community structure included variables measured on multiple scales, values were standardized and square-root transformed.\u00a0 Collinear variables were excluded, and variables were standardized and square-root transformed. Resemblance matrices were prepared for both data types using Bray Curtis similarities (biotic data) or Euclidean Distances (physical conditions).\u00a0 To evaluate associations between biotic and physical data, analyses were conducted first, with data obtained in the year of measurement.\u00a0 To test for delayed responses in community structure, the biotic data for each year were also compared to the physical conditions 1 y earlier, 2 y earlier, and averaged over the 3 y starting with the measurement year and extending back 2 y.\u00a0 Testing for delayed responses was motivated by the possibility that physical conditions in any one year initiated biological responses that were not evident until one or more year had passed.\u00a0 Finally, biotic and environment conditions were compared using 3 y moving averages to smooth stochastic variation from year to year.\u00a0 Significance of \uf072 was determined within a permutational framework (999 permutations) as the probability of occurrence by chance alone (p<\/em>perm<\/sub>).<\/p>\n The BEST procedure does not model the multivariate data, rather it detects the best rank order match between dissimilarities in two data sets; often it identifies multiple associations including those with differing numbers of variables.\u00a0 To determine the best linear model between physical conditions and biological data, we used the DISTLM procedure, which distinguished among the multiple associations identified in the BEST procedure.\u00a0 Where BEST identified significant associations, DISTLM was used to identify the most effective combination of variables explaining the biological data in a linear model, with the best fit identified by AICc<\/sub>.\u00a0 All possible combinations of predictor variables were considered.\u00a0 Values reported are combinations of physical conditions that are significantly associated with the biological data (i.e., as detected with the BEST procedure), and have the greatest explanatory capacity.<\/p>\n The 6 study sites were censused annually using photoquadrats randomly positioned along a marked transect parallel to the depth contour.\u00a0 From 1992 to 1999, each site was sampled with ~ 18 photoquadrats along a 20-m transect, with images recorded using a Nikonos V camera fitted with a 28 mm lens, strobes, and Kodachrome 64 film.\u00a0 Color slides were scanned at 4000 dpi for analysis.\u00a0 In 2000, each transect was extended to 40 m length, and the sampling was increased to 40 photoquadrats distributed randomly along the transect.\u00a0 Increased sampling was made possible with the advent of digital cameras (3.3 to 16.2 megapixels).\u00a0 All cameras were mounted on a framer and recorded a 0.5 \u00d7 0.5 m quadrat that resolved objects \u2265 1 cm.<\/p>\n Photoquadrats were analyzed for the percentage cover of scleractinians, macroalgae, and CTB by identifying the benthic substratum beneath 200 randomly-placed points on each image using CPCe software.\u00a0 Scleractinians were resolved to 26 taxa, and macroalgae were defined as \u2265 1 cm thalli of mostly Lobophora, Halimeda, Padina, and Dictyota.\u00a0 Using the same photoquadrats, octocorals were resolved to 11 genera, and colonies that could not be identified were categorized as \u201cunknown\u201d.\u00a0 Octocorals were counted in each photoquadrat, with arborescent taxa scored by the presence of holdfasts, and encrusting Erythropodium scored based on the number of discrete patches (i.e., colonies).\u00a0 As colonies of Erythropodium caribaeorum undergo fission and fusion, colony abundance could provide a misleading indication of ecological trends affecting this species.\u00a0 To explore this possibility, the percentage cover of E. caribaeorum also was calculated using the same methods as described above for scleractinians, macroalgae, and CTB.\u00a0<\/p>\n Local- and regional- scale measurements of the physical environment were tested in a multivariate framework for their ability to account for temporal variance in the biotic data. Seawater temperature was measured at 9\u201311 m depth in Great Lameshur Bay using loggers and was averaged by day to calculate the mean, minimum, maximum temperature, as well as the number of hot days (mean > 29.3\u00b0C), and cold days (mean \u2264 26.0\u00b0C).\u00a0 The 29.3\u00b0C cut-off for defining hot days was based on the local coral bleaching threshold, as determined by the United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service (http:\/\/coralreefwatch.noaa.gov\/vs\/index.php<\/a>).\u00a0 The 26.0\u00b0C cut-off for defining cold days is an arbitrary value defined as the 15th percentile of daily temperatures (Edmunds 2004), and it was employed to evaluate the potentially valuable effects of cold winters for promoting elevated coral biomass.\u00a0 Rainfall (cm y-1) was compiled for St. John, and hurricanes were evaluated on a categorical scale (Hindex).\u00a0 Hurricanes impacted the study areas after the annual monitoring, and their effects appear in coral community data from the year following each event.\u00a0 Temporal variation in the regional-scale physical environment was evaluated through a detrended index reflecting the effect of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) as reported in and provided courtesy of the first author.<\/p>\n Statistical analysis:<\/p>\n The BEST procedure was used for the regional-scale physical data (i.e., the AMO index), in which one environmental dependent variable was tested, and this was not smoothed further than in the primary analysis in which the AMO was reported.<\/p>\n Multivariate statistics based on resemblance matrices were conducted using PRIMER version 6 (Clarke & Gorley 2006) and PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER.\u00a0 Statistics related to autocorrelation and the correction of Model I regressions against time were conducted using XLStat 2015 (Addinsoft SARL).<\/p><\/div>","@type":"rdf:HTML"}],"http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/hasBriefDescription":[{"@value":"Coral reef abundance on shallow reefs of St. John, US Virgin Islands, 1992-2014","@language":"en-US"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/description":[{"@value":" Benthic coral reef communities were monitored on the south shore of St. John.\u00a0 In 1992, six sites were selected using random coordinates constrained to hard bottom on fringing reefs (< 9-m depth) between Cabritte Horn and White Point, and were permanently marked.\u00a0 Three sites (RS5, RS11 and RS15) resemble gorgonian plains, but the remainder have greater topographic complexity than gorgonian plains due to the presence of igneous boulders and cliffs.<\/p>\n The entire Excel Workbook, which contains two additional datasets (Community Structure: https:\/\/www.bco-dmo.org\/dataset\/750459<\/a> and\u00a0Physical Data: https:\/\/www.bco-dmo.org\/dataset\/750558<\/a>),\u00a0\u00a0can be downloaded from\u00a0https:\/\/datadocs.bco-dmo.org\/docs\/302\/St_John_LTREB\/data_docs\/Data_for_Paper_Metadata_copy.xls.\u00a0<\/a><\/p><\/div>","@type":"rdf:HTML"}],"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/01\/rdf-schema#label":[{"@value":"MEPS Edmunds Lasker Fig 2","@type":"xsd:string"}],"http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/hasProcessingDescription":[{"@value":" BCO-DMO Processing Notes:<\/p>\n