http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/750558 eng; USA utf8 dataset Highest level of data collection, from a common set of sensors or instrumentation, usually within the same research project Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) Unavailable 508-289-2009 WHOI MS#36 Woods Hole MA 02543 USA info@bco-dmo.org http://www.bco-dmo.org Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided. pointOfContact 2018-12-03 ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata - Part 2: Extensions for Imagery and Gridded Data ISO 19115-2:2009(E) Physical conditions during coral reef surveys of St. John, US Virgin Islands, from 1989-2014 2018-11-26 publication 2018-11-26 revision Marine Biological Laboratory/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Library (MBLWHOI DLA) 2021-05-26 publication https://doi.org/10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.750558.1 Peter J. Edmunds California State University Northridge principalInvestigator Howard Lasker State University of New York at Buffalo principalInvestigator Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) Unavailable 508-289-2009 WHOI MS#36 Woods Hole MA 02543 USA info@bco-dmo.org http://www.bco-dmo.org Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided. publisher Cite this dataset as: Edmunds, P. J., Lasker, H. (2021) Physical conditions during coral reef surveys of St. John, US Virgin Islands, from 1989-2014. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2018-11-26 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. doi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.750558.1 [access date] Physical conditions during coral reef surveys of St. John, US Virgin Islands, 1989-2014 Dataset Description: &lt;p&gt;Benthic coral reef communities were monitored on the south shore of St. John.&amp;nbsp; In 1992, six sites were selected using random coordinates constrained to hard bottom on fringing reefs (&amp;lt; 9-m depth) between Cabritte Horn and White Point, and were permanently marked.&amp;nbsp; Three sites (RS5, RS11 and RS15) resemble gorgonian plains, but the remainder have greater topographic complexity than gorgonian plains due to the presence of igneous boulders and cliffs.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The entire Excel Workbook, which contains two additional datasets (Community Structure: https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/750459 and Coral Reef Abundance: https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/750513),&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;can be downloaded from&amp;nbsp;https://datadocs.bco-dmo.org/docs/302/St_John_LTREB/data_docs/Data_for_Paper_Metadata_copy.xls.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Sampling: &lt;p&gt;Sites were treated as statistical replicates, and abundance and cover data from photoquadrats were averaged by site to describe community structure with 6 replicates y&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;.&amp;nbsp; To evaluate the implications of increasing the same size (no. of quadrats) from ~ 18 to ~ 40 in 2000, multivariate community structure (scleractinians by species, octocorals by genus, CTB, and macroalgae) was compared between the initial 18 quadrats and the additional quadrats using PERMANOVA.&amp;nbsp; This analysis was conducted with the 2000 census, and data were standardized (z-scores) to address their measurement on different scales, and fourth-root transformed prior to calculating resemblance matrices using Bray Curtis similarities.&amp;nbsp; Univariate contrasts were also conducted between the initial 18 quadrats and the additional quadrats using t-tests with Bonferroni-adjusted alpha values to reduce the risks of Type I errors.&amp;nbsp; Changes over time in the abundance of octocorals and scleractinians are displayed using line graphs showing mean ± SE for untransformed values.&amp;nbsp; Based on the taxonomic resolution described above, community structure was characterized by site using Shannon-Wiener Diversity (H´), Pielou’s Evenness (J´), and richness (number of taxa); in this application, these metrics refer to alpha diversity.&amp;nbsp; For scleractinians, H´ and J´ were calculated using percentage cover as a measure of abundance, and for octocorals, abundance was evaluated by density (colonies 0.25 m&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt;).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;PERMANOVA was used to test for changes in community structure among years (repeated measure) and sites (random effect) based on four assemblages: (1) the whole community (scleractinians, octocorals, macroalgae, and CTB), (2) octocorals by genus, (3) scleractinians by species, and (4) octocorals and scleractinians combined, to genus or species, respectively.&amp;nbsp; The same design was used in a univariate mode to test for time and site effects using H´, J´, and richness as dependent variables.&amp;nbsp; Comparisons of scleractinian and octocoral community structure over time were conducted using PERMANOVAs of resemblance matrices composed of Bray Curtis similarities.&amp;nbsp; Analyses were repeated for scleractinians and octocorals combined, and then for each separately.&amp;nbsp; In the combined scleractinian and octocoral analysis, data were normalized and square root transformed.&amp;nbsp; Analyses of scleractinians alone, or octocorals alone, used square root or fourth root transformed data, respectively.&amp;nbsp; Significance was tested in a permutational framework (999 permutations) and evaluated through Pseudo-F and the probability of obtaining the statistic values by chance alone (&lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sub&gt;perm&lt;/sub&gt;).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;To detect years between which significant changes in community structure occurred, planned contrasts were used between sequential years, and unplanned contrasts were used to compare sites.&amp;nbsp; The same techniques were used for H´, J´, and richness, except values were square-root transformed, and similarities determined using Euclidian Distance.&amp;nbsp; To evaluate rates of change in dependent variables over time, data were tested for temporal autocorrelation using the Durbin-Watson statistic.&amp;nbsp; Model I regressions were used where there was no autocorrelation, and where autocorrelation was detected, Model I linear regressions were adjusted using the Cochrane-Orcutt model.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Multivariate variation in community structure was described using MDS applied to the community structure averaged across sites within years, and described at two resolutions: (1) by functional group consisting of scleractinians (summed among taxa), octocorals (summed among genera), and macroalgae,and CTB, and (2) scleractinians by species, octocorals by genus, macroalgae and CTB.&amp;nbsp; Data were standardized (z-scores) to address their measurement on different scales, and fourth-root transformed prior to calculating resemblance matrices using Bray Curtis similarities.&amp;nbsp; MDS ordinations were prepared using 100 restarts until stress stabilized, and similarity contours were applied where they enhanced the interpretation of groupings.&amp;nbsp; Principle coordinate analyses (PCO) were prepared using the same resemblance matrices, and were overlaid with vectors displaying Spearman correlations between dependent variables and PCO1 and PCO2.&amp;nbsp; The length (scaled to ≤ 1) of the vectors shows the influence of dependent variables in causing separation along each axis.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The BEST procedure in PRIMER and DISTLM in PERMANOVA+ were used evaluate the extent to which community structure was associated with physical conditions.&amp;nbsp; The BEST procedure is based on rank correlations () between the resemblance matrix defining the community structure and a suite of resemblance matrices defining physical conditions.&amp;nbsp; Where community structure included variables measured on multiple scales, values were standardized and square-root transformed.&amp;nbsp; Collinear variables were excluded, and variables were standardized and square-root transformed. Resemblance matrices were prepared for both data types using Bray Curtis similarities (biotic data) or Euclidean Distances (physical conditions).&amp;nbsp; To evaluate associations between biotic and physical data, analyses were conducted first, with data obtained in the year of measurement.&amp;nbsp; To test for delayed responses in community structure, the biotic data for each year were also compared to the physical conditions 1 y earlier, 2 y earlier, and averaged over the 3 y starting with the measurement year and extending back 2 y.&amp;nbsp; Testing for delayed responses was motivated by the possibility that physical conditions in any one year initiated biological responses that were not evident until one or more year had passed.&amp;nbsp; Finally, biotic and environment conditions were compared using 3 y moving averages to smooth stochastic variation from year to year.&amp;nbsp; Significance of was determined within a permutational framework (999 permutations) as the probability of occurrence by chance alone (&lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sub&gt;perm&lt;/sub&gt;).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The BEST procedure does not model the multivariate data, rather it detects the best rank order match between dissimilarities in two data sets; often it identifies multiple associations including those with differing numbers of variables.&amp;nbsp; To determine the best linear model between physical conditions and biological data, we used the DISTLM procedure, which distinguished among the multiple associations identified in the BEST procedure.&amp;nbsp; Where BEST identified significant associations, DISTLM was used to identify the most effective combination of variables explaining the biological data in a linear model, with the best fit identified by AIC&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;.&amp;nbsp; All possible combinations of predictor variables were considered.&amp;nbsp; Values reported are combinations of physical conditions that are significantly associated with the biological data (i.e., as detected with the BEST procedure), and have the greatest explanatory capacity.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The 6 study sites were censused annually using photoquadrats randomly positioned along a marked transect parallel to the depth contour.&amp;nbsp; From 1992 to 1999, each site was sampled with ~ 18 photoquadrats along a 20-m transect, with images recorded using a Nikonos V camera fitted with a 28 mm lens, strobes, and Kodachrome 64 film.&amp;nbsp; Color slides were scanned at 4000 dpi for analysis.&amp;nbsp; In 2000, each transect was extended to 40 m length, and the sampling was increased to 40 photoquadrats distributed randomly along the transect.&amp;nbsp; Increased sampling was made possible with the advent of digital cameras (3.3 to 16.2 megapixels).&amp;nbsp; All cameras were mounted on a framer and recorded a 0.5 × 0.5 m quadrat that resolved objects ≥ 1 cm.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Photoquadrats were analyzed for the percentage cover of scleractinians, macroalgae, and CTB by identifying the benthic substratum beneath 200 randomly-placed points on each image using CPCe software.&amp;nbsp; Scleractinians were resolved to 26 taxa, and macroalgae were defined as ≥ 1 cm thalli of mostly Lobophora, Halimeda, Padina, and Dictyota.&amp;nbsp; Using the same photoquadrats, octocorals were resolved to 11 genera, and colonies that could not be identified were categorized as “unknown”.&amp;nbsp; Octocorals were counted in each photoquadrat, with arborescent taxa scored by the presence of holdfasts, and encrusting Erythropodium scored based on the number of discrete patches (i.e., colonies).&amp;nbsp; As colonies of Erythropodium caribaeorum undergo fission and fusion, colony abundance could provide a misleading indication of ecological trends affecting this species.&amp;nbsp; To explore this possibility, the percentage cover of E. caribaeorum also was calculated using the same methods as described above for scleractinians, macroalgae, and CTB.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Local- and regional- scale measurements of the physical environment were tested in a multivariate framework for their ability to account for temporal variance in the biotic data. Seawater temperature was measured at 9–11 m depth in Great Lameshur Bay using loggers and was averaged by day to calculate the mean, minimum, maximum temperature, as well as the number of hot days (mean &amp;gt; 29.3°C), and cold days (mean ≤ 26.0°C).&amp;nbsp; The 29.3°C cut-off for defining hot days was based on the local coral bleaching threshold, as determined by the United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service (http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/vs/index.php).&amp;nbsp; The 26.0°C cut-off for defining cold days is an arbitrary value defined as the 15th percentile of daily temperatures (Edmunds 2004), and it was employed to evaluate the potentially valuable effects of cold winters for promoting elevated coral biomass.&amp;nbsp; Rainfall (cm y-1) was compiled for St. John, and hurricanes were evaluated on a categorical scale (Hindex).&amp;nbsp; Hurricanes impacted the study areas after the annual monitoring, and their effects appear in coral community data from the year following each event.&amp;nbsp; Temporal variation in the regional-scale physical environment was evaluated through a detrended index reflecting the effect of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) as reported in and provided courtesy of the first author.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Statistical analysis:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The BEST procedure was used for the regional-scale physical data (i.e., the AMO index), in which one environmental dependent variable was tested, and this was not smoothed further than in the primary analysis in which the AMO was reported.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Multivariate statistics based on resemblance matrices were conducted using PRIMER version 6 (Clarke &amp;amp; Gorley 2006) and PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER.&amp;nbsp; Statistics related to autocorrelation and the correction of Model I regressions against time were conducted using XLStat 2015 (Addinsoft SARL).&lt;/p&gt; Funding provided by NSF Division of Environmental Biology (NSF DEB) Award Number: DEB-0841441 Award URL: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/show-award?AWD_ID=0841441 Funding provided by NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) Award Number: OCE-1332915 Award URL: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/show-award?AWD_ID=1332915 Funding provided by NSF Division of Environmental Biology (NSF DEB) Award Number: DEB-1350146 Award URL: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/show-award?AWD_ID=1350146 completed Peter J. Edmunds California State University Northridge 818-677-2502 Department of Biology 18111 Nordhoff Street Northridge CA 91330-8303 USA peter.edmunds@csun.edu pointOfContact Howard Lasker State University of New York at Buffalo 716-645-4870 Department of Geology 126 Cooke Hall Buffalo NY 14260-1350 USA hlasker@buffalo.edu pointOfContact asNeeded Dataset Version: 1 Unknown year Hurricane_Index rain_cm Temp Min_Temp Max_Temp No_Hot_Days No_Cold_Days digital cameras Onset Temperature Logger theme None, User defined year No BCO-DMO term air temperature days featureType BCO-DMO Standard Parameters Camera Temperature Logger instrument BCO-DMO Standard Instruments otherRestrictions otherRestrictions Access Constraints: none. Use Constraints: Please follow guidelines at: http://www.bco-dmo.org/terms-use Distribution liability: Under no circumstances shall BCO-DMO be liable for any direct, incidental, special, consequential, indirect, or punitive damages that result from the use of, or the inability to use, the materials in this data submission. If you are dissatisfied with any materials in this data submission your sole and exclusive remedy is to discontinue use. RUI-LTREB Renewal: Three decades of coral reef community dynamics in St. John, USVI: 2014-2019 http://coralreefs.csun.edu/ RUI-LTREB Renewal: Three decades of coral reef community dynamics in St. John, USVI: 2014-2019 <p>Describing how ecosystems like coral reefs are changing is at the forefront of efforts to evaluate the biological consequences of global climate change and ocean acidification. Coral reefs have become the poster child of these efforts. Amid concern that they could become ecologically extinct within a century, describing what has been lost, what is left, and what is at risk, is of paramount importance. This project exploits an unrivalled legacy of information beginning in 1987 to evaluate the form in which reefs will persist, and the extent to which they will be able to resist further onslaughts of environmental challenges. This long-term project continues a 27-year study of Caribbean coral reefs. The diverse data collected will allow the investigators to determine the roles of local and global disturbances in reef degradation. The data will also reveal the structure and function of reefs in a future with more human disturbances, when corals may no longer dominate tropical reefs.</p> <p>The broad societal impacts of this project include advancing understanding of an ecosystem that has long been held emblematic of the beauty, diversity, and delicacy of the biological world. Proposed research will expose new generations of undergraduate and graduate students to natural history and the quantitative assessment of the ways in which our planet is changing. This training will lead to a more profound understanding of contemporary ecology at the same time that it promotes excellence in STEM careers and supports technology infrastructure in the United States. Partnerships will be established between universities and high schools to bring university faculty and students in contact with k-12 educators and their students, allow teachers to carry out research in inspiring coral reef locations, and motivate children to pursue STEM careers. Open access to decades of legacy data will stimulate further research and teaching.</p> RUI-LTREB largerWorkCitation project eng; USA oceans -64.723 -64.723 18.32 18.32 1989-01-01 2014-12-31 USVI 0 BCO-DMO catalogue of parameters from Physical conditions during coral reef surveys of St. John, US Virgin Islands, from 1989-2014 Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) Unavailable 508-289-2009 WHOI MS#36 Woods Hole MA 02543 USA info@bco-dmo.org http://www.bco-dmo.org Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided. pointOfContact http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/750568.rdf Name: year Units: unitless Description: <p>year in YYYY format</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/750569.rdf Name: Hurricane_Index Units: unitless Description: <p>hurricane index as in Gross and Edmunds 2015</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/750570.rdf Name: rain_cm Units: centimeters (cm) Description: <p>rainfall amount</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/750571.rdf Name: Temp Units: degrees Celsius Description: <p>Yearly mean air temperature by day</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/750572.rdf Name: Min_Temp Units: degrees Celsius Description: <p>Yearly minimum air temperature by day</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/750573.rdf Name: Max_Temp Units: degrees Celsius Description: <p>Yearly maximum air temperature by day</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/750574.rdf Name: No_Hot_Days Units: days Description: <p>number of hot days by year</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/750575.rdf Name: No_Cold_Days Units: days Description: <p>number of cold days by year</p> GB/NERC/BODC > British Oceanographic Data Centre, Natural Environment Research Council, United Kingdom Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) Unavailable 508-289-2009 WHOI MS#36 Woods Hole MA 02543 USA info@bco-dmo.org http://www.bco-dmo.org Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided. pointOfContact 893 https://darchive.mblwhoilibrary.org/bitstream/1912/27174/1/dataset-750558_meps-edmunds-lasker-physical-data__v1.tsv download https://doi.org/10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.750558.1 download onLine dataset &lt;p&gt;Sites were treated as statistical replicates, and abundance and cover data from photoquadrats were averaged by site to describe community structure with 6 replicates y&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;.&amp;nbsp; To evaluate the implications of increasing the same size (no. of quadrats) from ~ 18 to ~ 40 in 2000, multivariate community structure (scleractinians by species, octocorals by genus, CTB, and macroalgae) was compared between the initial 18 quadrats and the additional quadrats using PERMANOVA.&amp;nbsp; This analysis was conducted with the 2000 census, and data were standardized (z-scores) to address their measurement on different scales, and fourth-root transformed prior to calculating resemblance matrices using Bray Curtis similarities.&amp;nbsp; Univariate contrasts were also conducted between the initial 18 quadrats and the additional quadrats using t-tests with Bonferroni-adjusted alpha values to reduce the risks of Type I errors.&amp;nbsp; Changes over time in the abundance of octocorals and scleractinians are displayed using line graphs showing mean ± SE for untransformed values.&amp;nbsp; Based on the taxonomic resolution described above, community structure was characterized by site using Shannon-Wiener Diversity (H´), Pielou’s Evenness (J´), and richness (number of taxa); in this application, these metrics refer to alpha diversity.&amp;nbsp; For scleractinians, H´ and J´ were calculated using percentage cover as a measure of abundance, and for octocorals, abundance was evaluated by density (colonies 0.25 m&lt;sup&gt;-2&lt;/sup&gt;).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;PERMANOVA was used to test for changes in community structure among years (repeated measure) and sites (random effect) based on four assemblages: (1) the whole community (scleractinians, octocorals, macroalgae, and CTB), (2) octocorals by genus, (3) scleractinians by species, and (4) octocorals and scleractinians combined, to genus or species, respectively.&amp;nbsp; The same design was used in a univariate mode to test for time and site effects using H´, J´, and richness as dependent variables.&amp;nbsp; Comparisons of scleractinian and octocoral community structure over time were conducted using PERMANOVAs of resemblance matrices composed of Bray Curtis similarities.&amp;nbsp; Analyses were repeated for scleractinians and octocorals combined, and then for each separately.&amp;nbsp; In the combined scleractinian and octocoral analysis, data were normalized and square root transformed.&amp;nbsp; Analyses of scleractinians alone, or octocorals alone, used square root or fourth root transformed data, respectively.&amp;nbsp; Significance was tested in a permutational framework (999 permutations) and evaluated through Pseudo-F and the probability of obtaining the statistic values by chance alone (&lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sub&gt;perm&lt;/sub&gt;).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;To detect years between which significant changes in community structure occurred, planned contrasts were used between sequential years, and unplanned contrasts were used to compare sites.&amp;nbsp; The same techniques were used for H´, J´, and richness, except values were square-root transformed, and similarities determined using Euclidian Distance.&amp;nbsp; To evaluate rates of change in dependent variables over time, data were tested for temporal autocorrelation using the Durbin-Watson statistic.&amp;nbsp; Model I regressions were used where there was no autocorrelation, and where autocorrelation was detected, Model I linear regressions were adjusted using the Cochrane-Orcutt model.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Multivariate variation in community structure was described using MDS applied to the community structure averaged across sites within years, and described at two resolutions: (1) by functional group consisting of scleractinians (summed among taxa), octocorals (summed among genera), and macroalgae,and CTB, and (2) scleractinians by species, octocorals by genus, macroalgae and CTB.&amp;nbsp; Data were standardized (z-scores) to address their measurement on different scales, and fourth-root transformed prior to calculating resemblance matrices using Bray Curtis similarities.&amp;nbsp; MDS ordinations were prepared using 100 restarts until stress stabilized, and similarity contours were applied where they enhanced the interpretation of groupings.&amp;nbsp; Principle coordinate analyses (PCO) were prepared using the same resemblance matrices, and were overlaid with vectors displaying Spearman correlations between dependent variables and PCO1 and PCO2.&amp;nbsp; The length (scaled to ≤ 1) of the vectors shows the influence of dependent variables in causing separation along each axis.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The BEST procedure in PRIMER and DISTLM in PERMANOVA+ were used evaluate the extent to which community structure was associated with physical conditions.&amp;nbsp; The BEST procedure is based on rank correlations () between the resemblance matrix defining the community structure and a suite of resemblance matrices defining physical conditions.&amp;nbsp; Where community structure included variables measured on multiple scales, values were standardized and square-root transformed.&amp;nbsp; Collinear variables were excluded, and variables were standardized and square-root transformed. Resemblance matrices were prepared for both data types using Bray Curtis similarities (biotic data) or Euclidean Distances (physical conditions).&amp;nbsp; To evaluate associations between biotic and physical data, analyses were conducted first, with data obtained in the year of measurement.&amp;nbsp; To test for delayed responses in community structure, the biotic data for each year were also compared to the physical conditions 1 y earlier, 2 y earlier, and averaged over the 3 y starting with the measurement year and extending back 2 y.&amp;nbsp; Testing for delayed responses was motivated by the possibility that physical conditions in any one year initiated biological responses that were not evident until one or more year had passed.&amp;nbsp; Finally, biotic and environment conditions were compared using 3 y moving averages to smooth stochastic variation from year to year.&amp;nbsp; Significance of was determined within a permutational framework (999 permutations) as the probability of occurrence by chance alone (&lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt;&lt;sub&gt;perm&lt;/sub&gt;).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The BEST procedure does not model the multivariate data, rather it detects the best rank order match between dissimilarities in two data sets; often it identifies multiple associations including those with differing numbers of variables.&amp;nbsp; To determine the best linear model between physical conditions and biological data, we used the DISTLM procedure, which distinguished among the multiple associations identified in the BEST procedure.&amp;nbsp; Where BEST identified significant associations, DISTLM was used to identify the most effective combination of variables explaining the biological data in a linear model, with the best fit identified by AIC&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;.&amp;nbsp; All possible combinations of predictor variables were considered.&amp;nbsp; Values reported are combinations of physical conditions that are significantly associated with the biological data (i.e., as detected with the BEST procedure), and have the greatest explanatory capacity.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The 6 study sites were censused annually using photoquadrats randomly positioned along a marked transect parallel to the depth contour.&amp;nbsp; From 1992 to 1999, each site was sampled with ~ 18 photoquadrats along a 20-m transect, with images recorded using a Nikonos V camera fitted with a 28 mm lens, strobes, and Kodachrome 64 film.&amp;nbsp; Color slides were scanned at 4000 dpi for analysis.&amp;nbsp; In 2000, each transect was extended to 40 m length, and the sampling was increased to 40 photoquadrats distributed randomly along the transect.&amp;nbsp; Increased sampling was made possible with the advent of digital cameras (3.3 to 16.2 megapixels).&amp;nbsp; All cameras were mounted on a framer and recorded a 0.5 × 0.5 m quadrat that resolved objects ≥ 1 cm.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Photoquadrats were analyzed for the percentage cover of scleractinians, macroalgae, and CTB by identifying the benthic substratum beneath 200 randomly-placed points on each image using CPCe software.&amp;nbsp; Scleractinians were resolved to 26 taxa, and macroalgae were defined as ≥ 1 cm thalli of mostly Lobophora, Halimeda, Padina, and Dictyota.&amp;nbsp; Using the same photoquadrats, octocorals were resolved to 11 genera, and colonies that could not be identified were categorized as “unknown”.&amp;nbsp; Octocorals were counted in each photoquadrat, with arborescent taxa scored by the presence of holdfasts, and encrusting Erythropodium scored based on the number of discrete patches (i.e., colonies).&amp;nbsp; As colonies of Erythropodium caribaeorum undergo fission and fusion, colony abundance could provide a misleading indication of ecological trends affecting this species.&amp;nbsp; To explore this possibility, the percentage cover of E. caribaeorum also was calculated using the same methods as described above for scleractinians, macroalgae, and CTB.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Local- and regional- scale measurements of the physical environment were tested in a multivariate framework for their ability to account for temporal variance in the biotic data. Seawater temperature was measured at 9–11 m depth in Great Lameshur Bay using loggers and was averaged by day to calculate the mean, minimum, maximum temperature, as well as the number of hot days (mean &amp;gt; 29.3°C), and cold days (mean ≤ 26.0°C).&amp;nbsp; The 29.3°C cut-off for defining hot days was based on the local coral bleaching threshold, as determined by the United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service (http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/vs/index.php).&amp;nbsp; The 26.0°C cut-off for defining cold days is an arbitrary value defined as the 15th percentile of daily temperatures (Edmunds 2004), and it was employed to evaluate the potentially valuable effects of cold winters for promoting elevated coral biomass.&amp;nbsp; Rainfall (cm y-1) was compiled for St. John, and hurricanes were evaluated on a categorical scale (Hindex).&amp;nbsp; Hurricanes impacted the study areas after the annual monitoring, and their effects appear in coral community data from the year following each event.&amp;nbsp; Temporal variation in the regional-scale physical environment was evaluated through a detrended index reflecting the effect of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) as reported in and provided courtesy of the first author.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Statistical analysis:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The BEST procedure was used for the regional-scale physical data (i.e., the AMO index), in which one environmental dependent variable was tested, and this was not smoothed further than in the primary analysis in which the AMO was reported.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Multivariate statistics based on resemblance matrices were conducted using PRIMER version 6 (Clarke &amp;amp; Gorley 2006) and PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER.&amp;nbsp; Statistics related to autocorrelation and the correction of Model I regressions against time were conducted using XLStat 2015 (Addinsoft SARL).&lt;/p&gt; Specified by the Principal Investigator(s) &lt;p&gt;BCO-DMO Processing Notes:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;added conventional header with dataset name, PI name, version date&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;modified parameter names to conform with BCO-DMO naming conventions&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; Specified by the Principal Investigator(s) asNeeded 7.x-1.1 Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) Unavailable 508-289-2009 WHOI MS#36 Woods Hole MA 02543 USA info@bco-dmo.org http://www.bco-dmo.org Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided. pointOfContact digital cameras digital cameras PI Supplied Instrument Name: digital cameras PI Supplied Instrument Description:The positions of photoquadrats were re-randomized at each sampling, and they were recorded using digital cameras (Nikon SLRs, with 6–36 Megapixel resolution) fitted with a zoom lens (Nikon DX 18–70 mm or FX 18–35 mm) and placed in a waterproof housing (Ikelite).  Instrument Name: Camera Instrument Short Name:camera Instrument Description: All types of photographic equipment including stills, video, film and digital systems. Community Standard Description: http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/L05/current/311/ Onset Temperature Logger Onset Temperature Logger PI Supplied Instrument Name: Onset Temperature Logger PI Supplied Instrument Description:To provide physical environmental context to enhance the interpretation of coral community dynamics, seawater temperature was recorded at 9-m depth at Yawzi Point using loggers (± 0.2 °C, Model U22-001, Onset Computer Corp., Bourne, MA) recording at 1 mHz. Instrument Name: Temperature Logger Instrument Short Name: Instrument Description: Records temperature data over a period of time.