Dataset: Copepod Ingestion Experiments - Fluorescence

During the summer of 2018 and fall of 2019, six experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of phytoplankton growth phase on the ingestion rate of the copepod Calanus pacificus on phytoplankton and marine snow aggregates (formed from the same phytoplankton). Each experiment consisted of three treatments: a control (in which copepods were placed in tanks with filtered seawater and no food source), an individual phytoplankton treatment (in which copepods were placed in tanks with individual phytoplankton as a food source), and an aggregate treatment (in which copepods were placed in tanks with aggregates as a food source). The six experiments were: Experiment 1 conducted in June of 2018, Experiment 2 in July of 2018, Experiment 3 in September of 2019, Experiment 4 in October of 2019, Experiment 5 in November of 2019, and Experiment 6 in December of 2019. Ingestion rate was quantified in these experiments using two methods: gut pigment analysis and stable isotope analysis.

C. pacificus was collected using a small boat near Scripps Canyon in La Jolla, CA (32° 51.720’ N, 117° 16.816’ W) 5-20 days before each experiment with a 333 µm mesh plankton net (0.5 m diameter mouth). Samples were sorted in the lab to isolate individuals of the species C. pacificus. Copepods were maintained with regular water changes in an incubator in the dark at 18°C until the experiment and fed a mixed diet of Thalassiosira weissflogii and haptophytes (Tisochrysis sp. and Pavlova sp.) for the 2018 experiments and Thalassiosira weissflogii and Skeletonema marinoi for the 2019 experiments. Copepods were starved for 24 hours prior to each experiment by transferring 30 C. pacificus individuals (C5 copepodites and female adults) into a beaker corresponding to each treatment tank. Each beaker was wrapped in aluminum foil to maintain darkness, and was kept at room temperature.

Prior to each experiment, phytoplankton cultures of the species T. weissflogii (Experiments 1, 2, 3, and 5) or S. marinoi (Experiments 4 and 6) were started in 2L flasks. All cultures were grown in f/2 media at room temperature under 12:12 hour LED light:dark cycle. In total, two culture flasks were started for each growth phase: one flask for the aggregate treatment and one flask for the phytoplankton treatment. The aggregate treatment culture flasks were started three days prior to the phytoplankton treatment culture flasks, to account for the fact that the aggregate treatment culture flasks were stopped three days earlier to allow for aggregate formation on a roller table (described below). Experiments 1 and 2 were carried out for three different growth phases (with the corresponding phytoplankton culturing time shown in parentheses): Early Exponential (5 days), Late Exponential (13 days), and Late Stationary (20 days). Experiments 3, 4, 5, and 6 were carried out for Early Exponential (5 days) and Late Exponential (12 days) growth phases.

Three days before each experiment, after the aggregate treatment phytoplankton cultures had grown for the time specified above (depending on growth phase), these cultures were diluted (to 20,000 cell/mL for T. weissflogii and 39,000 cells/mL for S. marinoi) and added to two cylindrical acrylic tanks (each with a volume of 550 mL). These cylindrical tanks were allowed to rotate in the dark on roller table for 3 days at a rate of 4.6 rpm to form aggregates.

On the day of each experiment for each growth phase, two replicate cylindrical tanks (each with a volume of 2200 mL) were prepared per treatment (control, individual phytoplankton, and aggregate), thus resulting in 6 tanks per experiment per growth phase. The control tanks were filled completely with filtered seawater along with a small amount of N-15 nitrate solution such that the final concentration of N-15 in the tank was comparable to that in the phytoplankton and aggregate treatment tanks. The phytoplankton treatment tanks were filled with the phytoplankton culture that was diluted with filtered seawater (to final concentration of 5,000 cells/mL for T. weissflogii and 9,750 cells/mL for S. marinoi). For the aggregate treatments, aggregates formed in the smaller cylindrical tanks were transferred to the experimental tank (which had four times the volume) along with the associated seawater; the rest of the volume of the experimental tank was filled with filtered seawater, thus resulting in an equivalent phytoplankton concentration (in cells/mL) between the phytoplankton and aggregate treatment tanks. For each treatment tank, 30 copepods were added and copepods were allowed to feed for an hour while the tank slowly rotating at ~1 rpm. Note that due to a lack of copepods, only one tank per treatment was run in the Late Stationary growth phase for Experiment 1 and only one control tank was run in the Late Stationary growth phase for Experiment 2.

Immediately after the one-hour incubation time had elapsed for each treatment, 40 mL of seltzer water was added to the tank to anesthetize the copepods. The copepods were removed from the cylindrical experimental tank with gentle suctioning of water onto a filter. For gut pigment analysis, two copepods were placed in 6-10 amber vials (depending on the total number of copepods recovered), which contained 3 mL of 90% acetone. A sonicator was used to break up the copepods at 40% amplitude for 5 seconds and release their gut content into the acetone solution. In addition, after each experiment water from each experimental tank was evenly mixed, and three subsamples of 25 mL of tank water was filtered onto a GF/F filter and placed into 5 mL of acetone. After about a day in a -20°C freezer, the copepod and tank water samples were analyzed using a Trilogy Laboratory Fluorometer (Turner Designs) to measure the concentration of chlorophyll and pheophytin in the acetone solution.

Samples were also collected to calculate ingestion rate using stable analysis methods. For information on that and the associated data, see related dataset https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/824576