Flow through sediment core incubations for nitrogen concentration and isotopic fluxes collected in 2013 on the Island of Sylt, Germany in the North Sea.

Website: https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/827378
Data Type: experimental
Version: 1
Version Date: 2020-11-02

Project
» Collaborative Research: Nitrous Oxide Production and Fluxes in Coastal Sediments: Response to Environmental Change (Coastal_Nitrous_Oxide)
ContributorsAffiliationRole
Wankel, ScottWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI)Principal Investigator
Ziebis, WiebkeUniversity of Southern California (USC)Co-Principal Investigator
Haskins, ChristinaWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO)BCO-DMO Data Manager

Abstract
Flow through sediment core incubations for nitrogen concentration and isotopic fluxes collected in 2013 on the Island of Sylt, Germany in the North Sea.


Coverage

Temporal Extent: 2013-08-14 - 2013-08-22

Acquisition Description

Sediments were collected from three intertidal sites near Königshafen on the island of Sylt in the North Sea, Germany. The ‘Schlickwatt (CL)’ and ‘Mischwatt (SLT)’ sites were located inside a small lagoon, while the ‘Sandwatt (SD)’ site was more openly exposed to wind and waves. Thirty intact push cores (30cm length, 10cm OD) were taken using polycarbonate core liners having vertical lines of silicone sealed holes (ø 3mm) at 1-cm intervals to allow porewater collection. Cores were retrieved leaving ~10 cm of overlying water and sealed with double o-ring caps to minimize gas exchange during transport, and brought immediately back to the laboratory. The gas-tight sealed sediment cores were incubated in the dark at in situ temperatures (19˚C) while being continuously supplied with filtered seawater at a flow rate of 1.8  0.06 ml/min for ~8 days. For experimental manipulations, four different inflow seawater compositions were used: “Low nitrate” (air sparged; ~20uM; LN), “Low oxygen, low nitrate” (sparged with N2 to 30-35% O2 saturation; ~20uM; LOLN), “High nitrate” (amended with NaNO3 to ~120uM (above background nitrate); HN) and “low oxygen, high nitrate” (combined treatments; LOHN). Samples of each sediment core effluent were taken twice per day.

Concentrations of NO3- + NO2- were measured by chemiluminescence after reduction in a hot acidic vanadyl sulfate solution on a NOx analyzer (Braman and Hendrix, 1989). Concentrations of NO2- were quantified by using the Griess-Ilosvay method followed by measuring absorption 540nm, and NO3- was quantified by difference (Grasshoff et al., 1999). Concentrations of NH4+ were measured by fluorescence using the OPA method (Holmes et al., 1999). Concentrations of N2O were made using the integrated peak area of the m/z 44 beam on the IRMS, standardizing to analyses of known amounts of N2O (injected into N2 sparged seawater in 160ml serum bottles) and normalizing to sample volume (158ml).

All N and O isotopic composition measurements (d15N and d18O (or d17O); where d15N = [(15Rsample/15RAir)-1)*1000 in units of ‰, and 15R = 15N/14N and where d18O = [(18Rsample/18RVSMOW)-1)*1000 in units of ‰, and 18R = 18O/16O (or 17O/16O) were made after conversion of analytes to nitrous oxide, followed by purification with a customized purge and trap system similar to that previously described (McIlvin and Casciotti, 2010) and analysis on a continuous flow IsoPrime 100 isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS). D17O refers to the excess 17O beyond that defined by the terrestrial fractionation line for the oxygen isotope system and is defined as D17O = d17O*0.52 - d18O. Nitrate was converted to N2O using the denitrifier method (Casciotti et al., 2002; Sigman et al., 2001) after removal of nitrite by addition of sulfamic acid (Granger and Sigman, 2009). Corrections for drift, size and fractionation of O isotopes during bacterial conversion were carried out as previously described using NO3- standards USGS 32, USGS 34 and USGS 35 (Casciotti et al., 2002; McIlvin and Casciotti, 2011), with a typical reproducibility of 0.2‰ and 0.4‰ for d15N and d18O, respectively. Nitrate D17O measurements were made on separate aliquots by routing denitrifier-produced N2O through a gold tube (1/16” OD) held at 780˚C, thermally decomposing the N2O into N2 and O2, which were chromatographically separated using a 2m column (1/16” OD) packed with molecular sieve (5Å) before being sent into the IRMS (Kaiser et al., 2007; Komatsu et al., 2008). Nitrate standards USGS 35 and USGS 34 were used to normalize any scale contraction during conversion, with typical reproducibility of D17O measurements of 0.8‰. All samples for nitrite N and O isotope measurements were converted to N2O within 2 hours of collection using the azide method (McIlvin and Altabet, 2005). Internal nitrite isotope standards (WILIS 10, 11 and 20) were run in parallel at 3 different sizes to correct for any variations in sample size and instrumental drift, with a typical reproducibility for both d15N and d18O is 0.2‰. Based on calibrations against isotope standards USGS 32, 34 and 35 for d15N (Böhlke et al., 2003) and N23, N7373, and N10129 for d18O (Casciotti et al., 2007), the values of internal standards WILIS 10, 11, and 20 are reported here as -1.7, +57.1, and -7.8‰ for d15N and +13.2, +8.6 and +47.6‰ for d18O, respectively. Nitrite D17O measurements were made after conversion to N2O using the azide method and normalized using a combination of NO2- and NO3- isotopic standards. D17O values of NO2- isotope standards WILIS 10 and WILIS 11 were calibrated previously against USGS 34 and USGS 35 using the denitrifier method followed by thermal decomposition of N2O to N2 and O2 as described above – yielding D17O values of 0‰ for both. For sample NO2-, raw d17O and d18O values were first normalized for oxygen isotopic exchange with water during the azide reaction (McIlvin and Altabet, 2005) using the calibrated d17O and d18O values of WILIS 10 and WILIS 11. During the same IRMS run, N2O produced from USGS 34 and USGS 35 via the denitrifier method was also thermally converted and analyzed as N2 and O2. Because any isotope fractionation occurring during these reactions is mass dependent (e.g., D17O is unaffected), the D17O of NO2- can be calculated by normalizing to D17O values of these NO3- standards. We disregard the small amount of oxygen isotope exchange occurring during the denitrifier method, as this would have only a small impact on the calculated D17O values. Total reduced nitrogen (TRN, e.g., DON + NH4+) was measured in a subset of incubation cores by oxidation of the total dissolved nitrogen (TDN) pool via persulfate digest – followed by d15N analysis using the denitrifier method, similar to that previously described (Knapp et al., 2005). The d15N of the TRN pool was then calculated by mass balance by subtracting the molar contribution of the measured d15N of NO3- and NO2- pools to the TDN pool. Based on the measurement of NH4+ concentrations, the DON flux was generally of the same magnitude as the NH4+ flux (not shown). For dissolved N2O, samples were extracted from the 160ml serum bottles using a purge and trap approach similar to that previously described (McIlvin and Casciotti, 2010). Liquid samples were quantitatively transferred from the sample bottle into a purging flask using a 20psi He stream, followed by He-sparging (~45 min) and cryogenic trapping using the same system described above for nitrate and nitrite derived N2O. Isotopic composition of the dissolved N2O was measured by direct comparison against the N2O reference tank. The composition of this tank (d15N bulk = -0.7‰; d18O = +39.1‰; site preference (SP) = -5.3‰, where SP = d15N alpha – d15N beta, and alpha and beta refer to the central and outer N atoms in the linear N2O molecule, respectively) was calibrated directly against aliquots of two previously calibrated N2O tanks from the Ostrom Lab at Michigan State University, having been calibrated by Tokyo Tech. Several sample analyses of tropospheric N2O from the study site using this system yielded isotope values of +6.8  0.7‰ for d15N bulk, +44.1  1.7‰ for d18O and +17.4  2.2‰ for SP. Reported values have been corrected for any size linearity of isotopic ratios (31/30, 45/44 and 46/44) by using a series of reference tank subsamples injected into 20ml headspace vials using a gastight syringe. Precision for replicate analyses of our reference gas analyzed as samples for d15N is  0.3‰, for d18O is 0.4‰ and for SP is 0.8‰. The D17O of N2O was calculated similar to that described above for NO2-. After extraction and cryotrapping, the N2O sample is thermally decomposed to N2 and O2 and chromatographically separated before measurement on the IRMS. Regular analyses of N2O converted from NO3- isotope standards (USGS 35 and USGS 34) via the denitrifier method were made to normalize D17O values.


Processing Description

Mass fluxes were calculated as a function of the steady-state difference between influent and effluent concentrations ([C]), flow rate (r) and sediment surface area (A) using: Flux = ([C]change * r)/A. Error estimates of fluxes incorporate variations in both measured flow rates as well as steady state concentrations.

For dissolved ions, effluent was directed into HDPE bottles and allowed to fill for ~60 minutes before subsampling, filtering (0.2um) and freezing (-20˚C). Separate 20ml aliquots were taken for measurement of dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations (nitrate, nitrite and ammonium) and stable isotopic composition. Concentrations of nitrite and ammonium were made immediately, while nitrate concentrations were measured back in the Wankel lab at WHOI. Samples for dissolved N2O were directed through gas impermeable PEEK tubing directly into pre-evacuated Tedlar gas sampling bags followed by gentle transfer into 160ml serum bottles using a ¼” OD silicone tubing, filling from the bottom to minimize turbulence and gas exchange. Sample water was allowed to overflow the bottle volume for at least two volumes before crimp-sealing and preserving with 100ul of a saturated HgCl2 solution.

BCO-DMO Data Manager Processing Notes:
* added a conventional header with dataset name, PI name, version date
* modified parameter names to conform with BCO-DMO naming conventions
* blank values in this dataset are displayed as "nd" for "no data."  nd is the default missing data identifier in the BCO-DMO system.
* removed all spaces in headers and replaced with underscores
* removed all units from headers
* converted dates to ISO Format yyyy-mm-dd
* created Date_Local column to replace Date column
* created ISO_DateTime_Local from Time_Stamp column
* set Types for each data column


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Related Publications

Braman, R. S., & Hendrix, S. A. (1989). Nanogram nitrite and nitrate determination in environmental and biological materials by vanadium(III) reduction with chemiluminescence detection. Analytical Chemistry, 61(24), 2715–2718. doi:10.1021/ac00199a007
Methods
Böhlke, J. K., Mroczkowski, S. J., & Coplen, T. B. (2003). Oxygen isotopes in nitrate: new reference materials for18O:17O:16O measurements and observations on nitrate-water equilibration. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 17(16), 1835–1846. doi:10.1002/rcm.1123
Methods
Casciotti, K. L., Böhlke, J. K., McIlvin, M. R., Mroczkowski, S. J., & Hannon, J. E. (2007). Oxygen Isotopes in Nitrite:  Analysis, Calibration, and Equilibration. Analytical Chemistry, 79(6), 2427–2436. doi:10.1021/ac061598h
Methods
Casciotti, K. L., Sigman, D. M., Hastings, M. G., Böhlke, J. K., & Hilkert, A. (2002). Measurement of the Oxygen Isotopic Composition of Nitrate in Seawater and Freshwater Using the Denitrifier Method. Analytical Chemistry, 74(19), 4905–4912. doi:10.1021/ac020113w
Methods
Granger, J., & Sigman, D. M. (2009). Removal of nitrite with sulfamic acid for nitrate N and O isotope analysis with the denitrifier method. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 23(23), 3753–3762. doi:10.1002/rcm.4307
Methods
Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K., & Ehrhardt, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of seawater analysis. John Wiley & Sons. https://isbnsearch.org/isbn/978-3-527-61399-1
Methods
Holmes, R. M., Aminot, A., Kérouel, R., Hooker, B. A., & Peterson, B. J. (1999). A simple and precise method for measuring ammonium in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56(10), 1801–1808. doi:10.1139/f99-128
Methods
Kaiser, J., Hastings, M. G., Houlton, B. Z., Röckmann, T., & Sigman, D. M. (2007). Triple Oxygen Isotope Analysis of Nitrate Using the Denitrifier Method and Thermal Decomposition of N2O. Analytical Chemistry, 79(2), 599–607. doi:10.1021/ac061022s
Methods
Knapp, A. N., Sigman, D. M., & Lipschultz, F. (2005). N isotopic composition of dissolved organic nitrogen and nitrate at the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study site. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19(1). doi:10.1029/2004gb002320 https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002320
Methods
Komatsu, D. D., Ishimura, T., Nakagawa, F., & Tsunogai, U. (2008). Determination of the15N/14N,17O/16O, and18O/16O ratios of nitrous oxide by using continuous-flow isotope-ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 22(10), 1587–1596. doi:10.1002/rcm.3493
Methods
McIlvin, M. R., & Altabet, M. A. (2005). Chemical Conversion of Nitrate and Nitrite to Nitrous Oxide for Nitrogen and Oxygen Isotopic Analysis in Freshwater and Seawater. Analytical Chemistry, 77(17), 5589–5595. doi:10.1021/ac050528s
Methods
McIlvin, M. R., & Casciotti, K. L. (2010). Fully automated system for stable isotopic analyses of dissolved nitrous oxide at natural abundance levels. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 8(2), 54–66. doi:10.4319/lom.2010.8.54
Methods
McIlvin, M. R., & Casciotti, K. L. (2011). Technical Updates to the Bacterial Method for Nitrate Isotopic Analyses. Analytical Chemistry, 83(5), 1850–1856. doi:10.1021/ac1028984
Methods
Sigman, D. M., Casciotti, K. L., Andreani, M., Barford, C., Galanter, M., & Böhlke, J. K. (2001). A Bacterial Method for the Nitrogen Isotopic Analysis of Nitrate in Seawater and Freshwater. Analytical Chemistry, 73(17), 4145–4153. doi:10.1021/ac010088e
Methods
Wankel, S. D., Ziebis, W., Buchwald, C., Charoenpong, C., de Beer, D., Dentinger, J., … Zengler, K. (2017). Evidence for fungal and chemodenitrification based N2O flux from nitrogen impacted coastal sediments. Nature Communications, 8(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms15595 https://doi.org/10.1038/NCOMMS15595
Methods
Results

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Parameters

ParameterDescriptionUnits
N_numberInternal Lab ID dimensionless
Study_NameStudy Identifier dimensionless
Date_LocalDate Sample Collected %Y-%m-%d
Bottle_Fill_StartTime Water Sample Collection began %H:%M
Bottle_Fill_StopTime Water Sample Collection ended %H:%M
Gas_Bag_StartTime Gas Sample Collection began %H:%M
Gas_Bag_StopTime Gas Sample Collection ended %H:%M
Time_StampTime Registered for Sample mm/dd/yy hh:mm
ElapsedTime Since Incubation Initiation Hours
Unique_IDUnique Sample Identifier dimensionless
CommentComment, Sample ID dimensionless
Site_TypePredominant Sediment Type dimensionless
Core_IDUnique Sediment Core ID dimensionless
Duplicate_IDCore A or B dimensionless
TreatmentExperimental Treatment unitless
TimepointSequential Sampling Time point dimensionless
Flow_RateSeawater Flow Rate through core mL/min
Inflow_NO2Inflow nitrite concentration uM
Inflow_NH4Inflow ammonium concentration uM
Inflow_NO3Inflow nitrate concentration uM
Inflow_N2OInflow Nitrous oxide concentration uM
Effluent_NO2Effluent nitrite concentration uM
Effluent_NH4Effluent ammonium concentration uM
Effluent_NO3Effluent nitrate concentration uM
Effluent_DONEffluent dissolved organic nitrogen uM
Effluent_TDNEffluent total dissolved nitrogen uM
Effluent_N2OEffluent nitrous oxide concentration nM
O2_FluxCalculated Dissolved Oxygen Flux mmol m-2 d-1
NO2_FluxCalculated Nitrite Flux mmol m-2 d-1
NH4_FluxCalculated Ammonium Flux mmol m-2 d-1
NO3_FluxCalculated Nitrate Flux mmol m-2 d-1
DON_FluxCalculated DON Flux mmol m-2 d-1
N2O_FluxCalculated N2O Flux umol m-2 d-1
NO3_d15NNitrate nitrogen isotope ratio per mil
NO3_d18ONitrate oxygen isotope ratio per mil
NO3_D17O17O isotope excess in nitrate per mil
NO2_d15NNitrite nitrogen isotope ratio per mil
NO2_d18ONitrite oxygen isotope ratio per mil
NO2_D17O17O isotope excess in nitrite per mil
TDN_d15NTotal dissolved nitrogen isotope ratio per mil
TRN_d15NTotal reduced nitrogen isotope ratio per mil
N2O_d15NNitrous oxide nitrogen isotope ratio per mil
N2O_d18ONitrous oxide oxygen isotope ratio per mil
N2O_SPNitrogen Isotope Site Preference N2O per mil
N2O_D17O17O isotope excess in N2O per mil
ISO_DateTime_LocalDate/Time (Local) ISO formatted %Y-%m-%dT%H:%M


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Instruments

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Turner Designs Aquafluor Fluorometer
Generic Instrument Name
Fluorometer
Generic Instrument Description
A fluorometer or fluorimeter is a device used to measure parameters of fluorescence: its intensity and wavelength distribution of emission spectrum after excitation by a certain spectrum of light. The instrument is designed to measure the amount of stimulated electromagnetic radiation produced by pulses of electromagnetic radiation emitted into a water sample or in situ.

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Isoprime 100 Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer
Generic Instrument Name
Mass Spectrometer
Generic Instrument Description
General term for instruments used to measure the mass-to-charge ratio of ions; generally used to find the composition of a sample by generating a mass spectrum representing the masses of sample components.

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Shimadzu UV 2550 Spectrophotometer
Generic Instrument Name
Spectrophotometer
Generic Instrument Description
An instrument used to measure the relative absorption of electromagnetic radiation of different wavelengths in the near infra-red, visible and ultraviolet wavebands by samples.

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Teledyne 200e NOx Analyzer
Generic Instrument Name
Chemiluminescence NOx Analyzer
Generic Instrument Description
The chemiluminescence method for gas analysis of oxides of nitrogen relies on the measurement of light produced by the gas-phase titration of nitric oxide and ozone. A chemiluminescence analyzer can measure the concentration of NO/NO2/NOX. One example is the Teledyne Model T200: http://www.teledyne-api.com/products/T200.asp


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Project Information

Collaborative Research: Nitrous Oxide Production and Fluxes in Coastal Sediments: Response to Environmental Change (Coastal_Nitrous_Oxide)

Coverage: Wadden Sea Field Station, Sylt, Germany; Santa Catalina Island, California,USA


NSF Abstract:

Although marine sediments are known "hotspots" of nitrous oxide (N2O) production and emission, current estimates and future projections of this potent greenhouse gas from coastal areas, especially in response to lower levels of dissolved oxygen and increased nitrogen inputs, are an approximation at best. Scientists from the University of Southern California and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute plan to improve upon these values by determining N2O dynamics at two coastal sites, Sylt, the German Wadden Sea, and Santa Catalina Island, a California Coastal lagoon. To attain their goal, they will carry out in-situ, high resolution microsensor measurements of N2O, oxygen, nitrate, nitric oxide, hydrogen sulfide, pH, redox potential, and temperature in conjunction with sediment and pore water analyses. Some of the sediment cores to be collected will be subjected to changes in oxygen content and nitrate concentrations in the overlying water to determine changes in nitrogen cycling activity and N2O flux as a function of low oxygen or nitrate addition. Using experimental incubations, the isotopic composition of N2O, nitrate, and ammonia will be measured to provide a quantitative estimate of net isotopic flux and N2O cycling processes. The combined use of microprofiling and multi-isotope approaches will provide not only detailed insight into N2O production and flux at these sites, but also yield data for a recently developed metabolic model to simulate and predict N2O dynamics under varying environmental conditions.

Broader Impacts: The research would strengthen the collaboration with German scientists. The proponents plan to create a webpage to discuss the technologies used in their project, as well as the activities taking place during their field trips. One postdoc and one undergraduate student from the University of Southern California would be supported and trained as part of this project.



[ table of contents | back to top ]

Funding

Funding SourceAward
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE)
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE)

[ table of contents | back to top ]