Fish densities sampled by Dual Frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON) within Artificial Seagrass Units (ASU) in Back Sound, NC from June to October 2018

Website: https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/891779
Data Type: Other Field Results
Version: 1
Version Date: 2023-03-13

Project
» Collaborative Research: Habitat fragmentation effects on fish diversity at landscape scales: experimental tests of multiple mechanisms (Habitat Fragmentation)
ContributorsAffiliationRole
Fodrie, F. JoelUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-Chapel Hill-IMS)Principal Investigator
Yeager, LaurenUniversity of Texas - Marine Science Institute (UTMSI)Co-Principal Investigator
Morley, JamesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-Chapel Hill-IMS)Scientist
Yarnall, AmyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-Chapel Hill-IMS)Scientist, Contact
Heyl, TaylorWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO)BCO-DMO Data Manager

Abstract
To parse the ecological effects of habitat area and patchiness on faunal community structure and dynamics of estuarine nekton, we employed artificial seagrass unit (ASU) landscapes at a scale relevant to habitat fidelity of common fish and macroinvertebrates in our temperate study system, Back Sound, NC. These ASU landscapes were designed along orthogonal axes of artificial seagrass area (i.e., percent cover of each landscape = 10-60 percent) and fragmentation per se (i.e., percolation probability; 0.1-0.59) to delineate their independent and interactive effects on seagrass fish communities. To examine potential differences among faunal responses to habitat configuration within structured habitat (i.e., artificial seagrass) versus matrix habitat (i.e., sand/mudflat) within the borders of the landscape footprint, fish densities (catch per unit effort; CPUE) were sampled by Dual Frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON) at three locations within each landscape from June to October 2018. Fish densities were sampled within the largest ASU patch of each landscape (“largest patch”) and at two locations within the matrix: 1-m away from the largest patch ("near-patch") and bisecting the largest interpatch distance ("interpatch"). Interpatch samples were not taken in landscapes with 0.59 percolation probability, as they only had one patch. DIDSON samples were collected by Drs. F. Joel Fodrie, James W. Morley, and Amy H. Yarnall for the Estuarine Ecology Laboratory of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Institute of Marine Sciences.


Coverage

Spatial Extent: N:34.707 E:-76.589 S:34.701 W:-76.603
Temporal Extent: 2018-06-29 - 2018-10-22

Methods & Sampling

This dataset represents fish densities (catch per unit effort; CPUE) sampled at three locations within each landscape on Oscar Shoal and an adjacent unnamed shoal in Back Sound, NC, USA (34°42′20" N to 34°41′60" N, 76°36′ 15" W to 76°35′17" W) during the summer of 2018. Benthopelagic fishes were sampled with Dual Frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON). DIDSON allowed us to reliably detect fishes regardless of water visibility (compared to traditional video cameras) and diversify the size range of organisms we were able to sample. However, DIDSON did not generally allow for species identification.

DIDSON recordings (hereafter “samples”, n = 166), each 1 minute in length, were taken in each landscape's largest patch in July, September, and October, and in each matrix location (i.e., interpatch, near-patch) in July and September. The sampling field of view ranged from 2 meters to 6.5 meters from the DIDSON, and artificial seagrass unit (ASU) and mudflat habitats could be easily distinguished in samples. DIDSON samples were standardized by positioning the sample targets at a range of 4.5 meters in the center of the viewing field. The DIDSON was mounted to a kayak, held stationary by a person on the opposite side of the sampling field, and was operated at a consistent depth below the surface (approximately 10 centimeters) and oriented to include most of the water column and also the substrate.

Known Issues:
The study area and artificial landscapes were directly impacted by Hurricane Florence during 13-16 Sept 2018. Despite ASU re-enforcements made prior to Florence's landfall (i.e., additional lawn staples and cable ties), our landscapes experienced substantial disturbance akin to natural seagrasses in the vicinity, in many cases completely removing or burying ASUs which altered the landscape percent cover and fragmentation per se parameters. Holding the original landscape 234 square meter footprint constant, post-Florence landscape percent cover and percolation probabilities were recalculated both including and excluding ASUs that were fully buried under sediment. DIDSON samples were taken both before and after Florence. Due to considerable landscape parameter alterations over this timeframe and potentially confounding disturbance influences, caution should be taken in examining post-Florence fish densities.


Data Processing Description

Using DIDSON software (V5.26.06), fishes were counted and measured on 10 randomly selected frames from each 1-minute sample. Random frame selection was constrained such that all frames were spaced a minimum of 25 frames apart to improve sub-sample independence. Fish counts for all 10 frames per sample were summed (i.e., number per sample) for further statistical analysis. This method does not differentiate between fishes that are maintaining position within the area versus transiting through, but represents a cumulative total of fish presences. In addition to the 10 frames per sample used to estimate fish presence, readers also selected and processed the frame with the maximum number of fish present (MaxN). All observe total fish lengths (in centimeters) were measured. If no fish were observed on a given frame, this is denoted by a length measurement of zero.

To account for potential reader bias in fish counts and length measurements (in centimeters), some samples were analyzed by two (n = 18) or three (n = 15) readers (reading identical sample frames). Readers counted statistically similar numbers of fishes per sample (paired two-sample t-test, P > 0.05), ruling out significant reader bias on fish counts.

Data output text files from DIDSON software were reformatted, reduced to relevant information, and output as a master Excel file using R statistical software (v3.6.2).

BCO-DMO Processing Description:
- Missing data identifier ‘NA’ replaced with blank (BCO-DMO's default missing data identifier)
- Added "Latitude" and "Longitude" columns and rounded to three decimal places
- Removed "%" symbol from data cells

 


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Data Files

File
asufrag_didsonfishcpue.csv
(Comma Separated Values (.csv), 471.02 KB)
MD5:ebc3c70e6cdc0e89299abd899c973ecd
Primary data file for dataset 891779.

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Related Publications

R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R v3.6.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
Software
Yarnall, A. H., Yeager, L. A., Lopazanski, C., Poray, A. K., Morley, J. M., Hurlbert, A., and Fodrie, F.J. Habitat area more consistently affects seagrass faunal communities than fragmentation per se.
Results

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Related Datasets

IsRelatedTo
Yarnall, A., Fodrie, F. J., Lopazanski, C., Poray, A. K., Yeager, L. (2023) Epibenthic faunal densities sampled from within Artificial Seagrass Units (ASU) in Back Sound, NC from June to October 2018. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2023-03-15 doi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.891859.1 [view at BCO-DMO]
Yarnall, A., Fodrie, F. J., Lopazanski, C., Poray, A. K., Yeager, L. (2023) Landscape fine-scale complexity of seagrass, fish and macroinvertebrate communities within Artificial Seagrass Units (ASU) in Back Sound, NC from July to September 2018. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2023-03-17 doi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.891652.1 [view at BCO-DMO]
Yarnall, A., Fodrie, F. J., Lopazanski, C., Poray, A. K., Yeager, L. (2023) Landscape parameters of seagrass, fish and macroinvertebrate communities within Artificial Seagrass Units (ASU) in Back Sound, NC from July to September 2018. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2023-03-27 doi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.891670.1 [view at BCO-DMO]
Yarnall, A., Fodrie, F. J., Lopazanski, C., Poray, A. K., Yeager, L. (2023) Settlement rates of fishes and crab megalopa within Artificial Seagrass Units (ASU) in Back Sound, NC from June to August 2018. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2023-03-20 doi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.891835.1 [view at BCO-DMO]
Yarnall, A., Fodrie, F. J., Lopazanski, C., Poray, A. K., Yeager, L. (2023) Squidpop consumption probability within Artificial Seagrass Units (ASU) in Back Sound, NC from October to November 2018. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2023-03-15 doi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.891794.1 [view at BCO-DMO]
Yarnall, A., Fodrie, F. J., Morley, J., Yeager, L. (2023) Fish measurements sampled by Dual Frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON) within Artificial Seagrass Units (ASU) in Back Sound, NC from July to September 2018. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2023-03-10 doi:10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.891686.1 [view at BCO-DMO]

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Parameters

ParameterDescriptionUnits
Site_IDArtificial seagrass unit (ASU) landscape name (Percent cover value-Percolation probability value) unitless
LatitudeLatitude North (South is negative) of sampling site decimal degrees
LongitudeLongitude East (West is negative) of sampling site decimal degrees
Per_covPercent cover of ASUs in 234 square meter landscape footprint (10, 22.5, 35, 47.5, 60) percent (%)
FragASU landscape fragmentation per se indexed by percolation probability (0.1, 0.225, 0.35, 0.475, 0.59) unitless
MaxNIndicates whether this frame has the max number of fish observed in the sample (y/n) unitless
Frames_sampledSample size of frames per recording (10 for MaxN = n; 1 for Maxfish = y) unitless
FrameFrame number unitless
FrameSampleFrame number assigned to fish length (within +/- 5 frames of "Frame" to find best view for measuring the fish length) unitless
L_cmTotal length of fish (L_cm = 0 indicates no fish were observed) centimeters (cm)
TimeTime of fish observation by DIDSON unitless
DateDate of fish observation DIDSON unitless
MonthMonth of sample round completion unitless
ClassFocal sample location within ASU landscape (largest patch, near-patch, inter-patch) unitless
ReaderInitials of data processor unitless


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Instruments

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Dual Frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON 3000m)
Generic Instrument Name
Dual Frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON 3000m)
Generic Instrument Description
The Sound Metrics DIDSON 3000 (Dual-Frequency Identification Sonar) multibeam imaging sonar is an acoustic camera that provides almost video-quality images in turbid or dark water where optical systems are ineffective. DIDSON uses acoustic lenses to focus beams and form an acoustic image on the transducer array. DIDSON forms images differently than an optical camera. DIDSON sends out short acoustic pulses in 48 or 96 acoustic beams. These beams are very narrow in the horizontal dimension (0.3° to 0.8°) and wide in the vertical dimension (14°). The beams are adjacent to each other and together form a field-of-view 29° horizontal and 14° vertical. The Didson 3000 is rated to a depth of 3000 meters. It has both Detection and Identification modes. The max frame rate (window length dependent) is 4-21 frames per second.


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Project Information

Collaborative Research: Habitat fragmentation effects on fish diversity at landscape scales: experimental tests of multiple mechanisms (Habitat Fragmentation)

Coverage: North Carolina


Amount and quality of habitat is thought to be of fundamental importance to maintaining coastal marine ecosystems. This research will use large-scale field experiments to help understand how and why fish populations respond to fragmentation of seagrass habitats. The question is complex because increased fragmentation in seagrass beds decreases the amount and also the configuration of the habitat (one patch splits into many, patches become further apart, the amount of edge increases, etc). Previous work by the investigators in natural seagrass meadows provided evidence that fragmentation interacts with amount of habitat to influence the community dynamics of fishes in coastal marine landscapes. Specifically, fragmentation had no effect when the habitat was large, but had a negative effect when habitat was smaller. In this study, the investigators will build artificial seagrass habitat to use in a series of manipulative field experiments at an ambitious scale. The results will provide new, more specific information about how coastal fish community dynamics are affected by changes in overall amount and fragmentation of seagrass habitat, in concert with factors such as disturbance, larval dispersal, and wave energy. The project will support two early-career investigators, inform habitat conservation strategies for coastal management, and provide training opportunities for graduate and undergraduate students. The investigators plan to target students from underrepresented groups for the research opportunities.

Building on previous research in seagrass environments, this research will conduct a series of field experiments approach at novel, yet relevant scales, to test how habitat area and fragmentation affect fish diversity and productivity. Specifically, 15 by 15-m seagrass beds will be created using artificial seagrass units (ASUs) that control for within-patch-level (~1-10 m2) factors such as shoot density and length. The investigators will employ ASUs to manipulate total habitat area and the degree of fragmentation within seagrass beds in a temperate estuary in North Carolina. In year one, response of the fishes that colonize these landscapes will be measured as abundance, biomass, community structure, as well as taxonomic and functional diversity. Targeted ASU removals will then follow to determine species-specific responses to habitat disturbance. In year two, the landscape array and sampling regime will be doubled, and half of the landscapes will be seeded with post-larval fish of low dispersal ability to test whether pre- or post-recruitment processes drive landscape-scale patterns. In year three, the role of wave exposure (a natural driver of seagrass fragmentation) in mediating fish community response to landscape configuration will be tested by deploying ASU meadows across low and high energy environments.



[ table of contents | back to top ]

Funding

Funding SourceAward
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE)

[ table of contents | back to top ]