Contributors | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
McGillicuddy, Dennis J. | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) | Co-Principal Investigator |
Petitpas, Christian | Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries | Co-Principal Investigator, Contact |
Turner, Jefferson | University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (UMass Dartmouth) | Co-Principal Investigator |
Zhang, Weifeng Gordon | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) | Co-Principal Investigator |
Soenen, Karen | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO) | BCO-DMO Data Manager |
Zooplankton were sampled at selected stations using a Multiple Opening/Closing Net and Environmental Sensing System (MOCNESS) with a 0.5 m2 mouth area (Wiebe et al., 1976). The first net sampled the entire sampling water column, and the other nets sampled at discrete depths.
At each station, 3 epipelagic depths (shallower than 100 m) were sampled based on the CTD fluorescence profiles: the surface, the subsurface chlorophyll maximum, and below the subsurface chlorophyll maximum. All three depths were sampled with 150 µm-mesh nets for 2 minutes and an additional sample was collected at the subsurface chlorophyll maximum using a 100 µm-mesh net.
A calibration was conducted at the end of the cruise consisting of two separate half-kilometer tows in opposite directions at 30-m depth, to confirm flow-meter readings with distance traveled. This allowed calculation of the volume of water sampled during each MOCNESS tow.
After retrieval, nets were washed down with a saltwater deck hose to concentrate zooplankton into net cod ends. Samples were then transferred to one-liter jars and preserved in approximately 10% formalin:seawater solutions for microscopic analyses ashore. At the shore-based laboratory, samples were drained through 64 µm-mesh sieves for removal of formalin:seawater and concentrated zooplankton were transferred to 70% ethanol for microscopic identification and enumeration as described in Petitpas et al. (2014).
File |
---|
961749_v1_mocness.csv (Comma Separated Values (.csv), 192.98 KB) MD5:081fa79316592468786ebc2920bd0d94 Primary data file for dataset ID 961749, version 1 |
Parameter | Description | Units |
Cruise | Cruise identifier | unitless |
Date | Date of sample collection (Based on Local Time: EDT) | unitless |
MOCNESS_Cast_No | Consecutive number of MOCNESS cast for Cruise | unitless |
Latitude | North latitude of tow start | decimal degrees |
Longitude | West longitude as indicated by negative of tow start | decimal degrees |
Mesh_size_microns | size of the openings (pores) in the plankton net | micrometer (µm) |
Station | Alphanumeric Station identifier. | unitless |
Depth_m | Depth where MOCNESS was towed and sample collected | meters (m) |
Volume_Sampled_m3 | Estimated volume of seawater that flowed through the MOCNESS | cubic meter (m3) |
Split_Factor | Inverse of ratio of Folsom plankton splitter split to whole sample | unitless |
Taxa | Zooplankton identification to the lowest practical taxonomic level | unitless |
Count | Number of organisms counted within the subsampled split volume | unitless |
Taxa_Concentration_animals_m3 | Concentration of identified zooplankton taxa | animals/m3 |
Comment | description | unknown |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | |
Generic Instrument Name | CTD Sea-Bird SBE 911plus |
Dataset-specific Description | CTD/Niskin bottle rosette equipped with a SBE 911 plus CTD system, and twenty-four 10 L Niskin bottles fitted with Teflon-coated external closures were used for water column sampling. |
Generic Instrument Description | The Sea-Bird SBE 911 plus is a type of CTD instrument package for continuous measurement of conductivity, temperature and pressure. The SBE 911 plus includes the SBE 9plus Underwater Unit and the SBE 11plus Deck Unit (for real-time readout using conductive wire) for deployment from a vessel. The combination of the SBE 9 plus and SBE 11 plus is called a SBE 911 plus. The SBE 9 plus uses Sea-Bird's standard modular temperature and conductivity sensors (SBE 3 plus and SBE 4). The SBE 9 plus CTD can be configured with up to eight auxiliary sensors to measure other parameters including dissolved oxygen, pH, turbidity, fluorescence, light (PAR), light transmission, etc.). more information from Sea-Bird Electronics |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | |
Generic Instrument Name | Niskin bottle |
Dataset-specific Description | CTD/Niskin bottle rosette equipped with a SBE 911 plus CTD system, and twenty-four 10 L Niskin bottles fitted with Teflon-coated external closures were used for water column sampling. Zooplankton were microscopically identified and counted using a Wild M5A dissecting microscope. |
Generic Instrument Description | A Niskin bottle (a next generation water sampler based on the Nansen bottle) is a cylindrical, non-metallic water collection device with stoppers at both ends. The bottles can be attached individually on a hydrowire or deployed in 12, 24, or 36 bottle Rosette systems mounted on a frame and combined with a CTD. Niskin bottles are used to collect discrete water samples for a range of measurements including pigments, nutrients, plankton, etc. |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Neil Armstrong |
Start Date | 2018-04-16 |
End Date | 2018-04-29 |
Website | |
Platform | NOAA Ship Ronald H. Brown |
Start Date | 2019-05-12 |
End Date | 2019-05-25 |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Thomas G. Thompson |
Start Date | 2019-07-05 |
End Date | 2019-07-18 |
Description |
NSF award abstract:
The continental shelf break of the Middle Atlantic Bight supports a productive and diverse ecosystem. Current paradigms suggest that this productivity is driven by several upwelling mechanisms at the shelf break front. This upwelling supplies nutrients that stimulate primary production by phytoplankton, which in turn leads to enhanced production at higher trophic levels. Although local enhancement of phytoplankton biomass has been observed in some circumstances, such a feature is curiously absent from time-averaged measurements, both from satellites and shipboard sampling. Why would there not be a mean enhancement in phytoplankton biomass as a result of the upwelling? One hypothesis is that grazing by zooplankton prevents accumulation of biomass on seasonal and longer time scales, transferring the excess production to higher trophic levels and thereby contributing to the overall productivity of the ecosystem. However, another possibility is that the net impact of these highly intermittent processes is not adequately represented in long-term means of the observations, because of the relatively low resolution of the in-water measurements and the fact that the frontal enhancement can take place below the depth observable by satellite. The deployment of the Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) Pioneer Array south of New England has provided a unique opportunity to test these hypotheses. The combination of moored instrumentation and autonomous underwater vehicles will facilitate observations of the frontal system with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. This will provide an ideal four-dimensional (space-time) context in which to conduct a detailed study of frontal dynamics and plankton communities needed to examine mechanisms controlling phytoplankton populations in this frontal system. This project will also: (1) promote teaching, training and learning via participation of graduate and undergraduate students in the research , (2) provide a broad dissemination of information by means of outreach in public forums, printed media, and a video documentary of the field work, and (3) contribute to improving societal well-being and increased economic competitiveness by providing the knowledge needed for science-based stewardship of coastal ecosystems, with particular emphasis on connecting with the fishing industry through the Commercial Fisheries Research Foundation.
The investigators will conduct a set of three cruises to obtain cross-shelf sections of physical, chemical, and biological properties within the Pioneer Array. Nutrient distributions will be assayed together with hydrography to detect the signature of frontal upwelling and associated nutrient supply. The investigators expect that enhanced nutrient supply will lead to changes in the phytoplankton assemblage, which will be quantified with conventional flow cytometry, imaging flow cytometry (Imaging FlowCytobot, IFCB), optical imaging (Video Plankton Recorder, VPR), traditional microscopic methods, and pigment analysis. Zooplankton will be measured in size classes ranging from micro- to mesozooplankton with the IFCB and VPR, respectively, and also with microscopic analysis. Biological responses to upwelling will be assessed by measuring rates of primary productivity, zooplankton grazing, and net community production. These observations will be synthesized in the context of a coupled physical-biological model to test the two hypotheses that can potentially explain prior observations: (1) grazer-mediated control and (2) undersampling. Hindcast simulations will also be used to diagnose the relative importance of the various mechanisms of upwelling. The intellectual merit of this effort stems from our interdisciplinary approach, advanced observational techniques, and integrated analysis in the context of a state-of-the-art coupled model. The project will address longstanding questions regarding hydrodynamics and productivity of an important ecosystem, leading to improved understanding of physical-biological interactions in a complex continental shelf regime. Given the importance of frontal systems in the global coastal ocean, it is expected that knowledge gained will have broad applicability beyond the specific region being studied.
Funding Source | Award |
---|---|
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) |