Impacts of submarine groundwater discharge on benthic community composition and functional diversity on coral reefs in Mo'orea, French Polynesia from Aug 2021 to Jun 2022

Website: https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/964240
Data Type: Other Field Results
Version: 1
Version Date: 2025-07-07

Project
» RUI: Collaborative Research: Defining the biogeochemical context and ecological impacts of submarine groundwater discharge on coral reefs (Moorea SGD)
ContributorsAffiliationRole
Silbiger, NyssaCalifornia State University Northridge (CSUN)Principal Investigator
Barnas, Danielle MCalifornia State University Northridge (CSUN)Co-Principal Investigator
Zeff, MayaCalifornia State University Northridge (CSUN)Scientist
Mickle, AudreyWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO)BCO-DMO Data Manager

Abstract
Coral reefs experience numerous natural and anthropogenic environmental gradients that alter biophysical conditions and affect biodiversity. While many studies have focused on drivers of reef biodiversity using traditional diversity metrics (e.g., species richness, diversity, evenness), less is known about how environmental variability may influence functional diversity. In this study, we tested the impact of submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) on taxonomic and functional diversity metrics in Mo'orea, French Polynesia. SGD is the expulsion of terrestrial fresh or recirculated seawater into marine environments and is associated with reduced temperatures, pH, and salinity and elevated nutrient levels. Using a regression approach along the SGD gradient, we found that taxon and functional-entity richness displayed unimodal relationships to SGD parameters, primarily nitrate + nitrite and phosphate variability, with peak richness at moderate SGD for stony coral and the full benthic community. Macroalgae showed this unimodal pattern for functional-entity but not taxonomic richness. Functional community composition (presence and abundance of functional entities) increased along the gradient, while taxonomic composition showed a nonlinear relationship to SGD-related parameters. SGD is a common feature of many coastal ecosystems globally and therefore may be more important to structuring benthic functional diversity than previously thought. Further, studying community shifts through a functional-trait lens may provide important insights into the roles of community functions on ecosystem processes and stability, leading to improved management strategies. This dataset includes site identifiers and survey metadata, substrate composition, structural complexity (rugosity), seawater parameters (salinity, temperature, pH, nutrients), taxonomic and functional traits of benthic taxa (morphology, calcification strategy, trophic group), proportional cover of benthic taxa, and community-level diversity metrics.


Coverage

Location: Mo'orea, French Polynesia
Spatial Extent: N:-17.53975 E:-149.89933 S:-17.5405 W:-149.90056
Temporal Extent: 2021-08-01 - 2022-06-14

Methods & Sampling

Detailed methods are outlined in the results publication Barnas et al. (2025) and summarized here. 

Study site and characterization

Mo‘orea, French Polynesia, is a tropical volcanic island with coastal fringing coral reefs where SGD is distributed through fissures in the reef plate (Knee et al. 2016; Hagedorn et al. 2020). Local fishers’ knowledge of an SGD seep informed the location of our survey site, and the presence of SGD was confirmed through spatial and temporal radon (Hagedorn et al. 2020, 2024) and biogeochemical surveys (Silbiger et al. 2023). We identified a focal seepage point on the western shore of Mo‘orea and haphazardly chose 19 survey locations downstream of the seep to study the effects of SGD on taxonomic and functional diversity. All survey locations had hard substrate with an average depth of 0.6 m and were within 150 m of the SGD seep, experiencing a gradient of SGD influence. Our field site experiences consistent northwestward unidirectional flow averaging 0.15 m/s (Silbiger et al. 2023), distributing SGD in a predictable alongshore gradient.

Biogeochemical measurements associated with SGD influence were assessed through discrete water sampling from high and low tides during the day and nighttime in August 2021 (n = 4 measurements per survey location). See Silbiger et al. (2023) for detailed methods and descriptions of the SGD gradient. In brief, water samples were collected concurrently at each time point in acid-washed, triple-rinsed 1 L HDPE bottles. Salinity, temperature, and pH were immediately measured using portable sensors (salinity accuracy ± 1.0% psu and precision = 0.1 psu, temperature accuracy ± 0.3 °C and precision = 0.1 °C, YSI Pro2030, Xylem Inc., Washington D.C., USA.; pH [total scale] accuracy ± 0.002 and precision = 0.001, tris-calibrated ROSSTM double junction electrode, Orion Star A325, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The water samples were also filtered through a 0.22 μm Sterivex filter before being frozen at −20 °C for subsequent nutrient analysis for concentrations of silicate [SiO32−], phosphate [PO43−], and nitrate + nitrite [N+N]). The samples were brought to the S-LAB at the University of Hawai‘i, where they were analyzed on a Seal Analytical AA3 HR Nutrient Analyzer (N+N: detection limit [DL] = 0.009 and coefficient of variation [CV] = 0.3%; PO43−: DL = 0.011 and CV = 0.2%; SiO32−: DL = 0.03 and CV = 0.5%). We calculated the coefficient of variation (CV = 100 × standard deviation/mean) for each biogeochemical parameter to characterize the SGD gradient for this study. CV was selected because sites most affected by SGD experienced both more extreme mean values and higher variability as SGD is pulsed onto the reef in association with the tidal cycle—SGD fluxes are highest during low tide (Burnett et al. 2006).

Community surveys

Benthic communities were surveyed via snorkeling at each survey location and at the SGD seepage point in June–July 2022. Our survey methods captured the species composition of coral, macroalgae, sponges, corallimorphs, anemones, and cyanobacteria. Composition was assessed within 2 × 2 m plots using a uniform point-count method with 200 evenly distributed points. Organisms at each point were identified to the species level when possible, or to the lowest possible taxonomic unit (Payri et al. 2000; Bosserelle 2014). Of the 51 taxa identified in this study, only six of those taxa could not be identified to the species level. In these cases, broader taxonomic classifications were necessary when identifying organisms in the community (i.e., ‘Crustose Corallines’ [CCA], Cyanobacteria unknown, Porifera unknown, Dictyosphaeria sp., Verongida sp., and turf). Therefore, we use the term ‘taxa’ instead of ‘species’ for accuracy in this dataset. Importantly, given our understanding of the life history of these broader groups, the use of these broad taxonomic classifications did not hinder our trait-based identifications. Taxa unidentifiable in the field were photographed and fragmented or collected whole for later identification. Substrate types were also identified at each point as sand, rubble, dead coral, or live coral to give context for taxon presence and abundance at each location.

Rugosity (an in situ measurement of structural heterogeneity) was measured by laying a 2 m length chain (15 mm link size) over the benthos at three parallel locations within the survey area at each location. We then calculated the ratio of the transect length of the draped chain to the total linear chain length for each measurement (Risk 1972). Mean rugosity was calculated by the average of these three ratios and subtracted from one, such that higher values reflect greater structural heterogeneity. We use the term ‘structural complexity’ as a synonym for ‘rugosity’ throughout for ease of interpretation.

Classification of functional traits

Each identified taxon was categorized into functional groups, which were selected for their contribution to broader community ecosystem functioning: phyla, morphology, calcification type, and trophic group (McGill et al. 2006). The combination of these functional groups comprises each taxon’s functional entity (FE), which provides context for each taxon’s ecological role within its community (Villéger et al. 2011; Chao et al. 2014). For example, the morphology of stony corals has been linked to photosynthetic and calcification efficiency, such that weedy branching corals exhibit greater rates of calcification than digitate or encrusting species (Alvarez-Filip et al. 2013). Conversely, branching and encrusting corals with minimal self-shading exhibit higher rates of photosynthesis and respiration than dense digitate species with self-shading and reduced interstitial flow (Carlot et al. 2022; Gattuso et al. 1999; Dennison and Barnes 1988). Relative growth rates among scleractinian corals are also dependent on morphology, such that tabular and branching species exhibit faster growth compared to those with massive morphologies (Zawada et al. 2019; Madin et al. 2020). Calcification functional traits provide insights into rates of calcification as well as to the resilience of calcifiers under environmental stress (Pentecost 1991). The phyla and functional traits specified within each functional group encompass the possible phyla and traits available from the full surveyed community taxon pool. Functional identification of each taxon was accomplished using the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS), CoralTrait Database, AlgaeTraits, species-identification guides, and primary literature. Notably, we were unable to identify all organisms to the species level. However, the functional entities ascribed to these broader classifications were consistent with characteristics of these taxa, both in the literature and according to our observations.

Taxonomic and functional diversity

We took a multi-framework approach to identifying taxonomic and functional diversity, using a combination of raw data, multidimensional space, and dissimilarity-based methods (Mammola et al. 2021). We calculated three diversity metrics to measure community shifts along the SGD gradient: proportional taxon richness (raw data), functional entity richness (raw data), and volume of functional entity trait space (multidimensional space). We also used Gower’s distance metric and Bray−Curtis dissimilarity matrices to characterize functional dispersion and taxa dissimilarity, respectively, as described in the statistical analyses section below (dissimilarity-based method). Taxon richness was determined as the total number of unique species or taxonomic units within each survey plot. Similarly, each taxon was represented by one functional entity (FE), where each FE encompassed the unique combination of functional traits from all functional groups—phyla, morphology, calcification type, and trophic group (Villéger et al. 2011). FE richness was determined by the total number of unique FEs within each survey plot. Relative taxon richness and FE richness were calculated as the total number of unique taxa or FEs present within each survey location relative to the total number of taxa (Taxon richnessT) or total number of functional entities (FE richnessT) observed across the full community, as follows:

% Taxon richness = 100 × (Taxon richness ÷ Taxon richnessT)
% FE richness = 100 × (FE richness ÷ FE richnessT)

The number of functional entities present at each site may have been equal to or less than the total number of taxa, and FE richness < taxon richness indicates functional redundancy, where more than one taxon shared the same functional entity and occupied a similar functional role in the community (Yachi and Loreau 1999). Functional entity volume, described as the volume of FE in multidimensional trait space, represents the dispersion of functional entities in multidimensional space through FE dissimilarity (Teixidó et al. 2018; Villéger et al. 2011). High FE volume indicates greater richness and dissimilarity across functional entities in a given surveyed community and therefore a wider range of functional roles, with less overlap in functionality. To calculate FE volume, a dissimilarity matrix of each survey location was calculated for FE using the daisy function with Gower’s distance metric (de Bello et al. 2013) in the cluster package in R, version 2.1.3., accessed 24 June 2023 (Teixidó et al. 2018; Maechler et al. 1999). Volumes of each survey site were calculated using the convhulln function in the geometry package in R, version 0.4.7, accessed on 24 June 2023 (Roussel et al. 2005).

Statistical analyses

We used multiple statistical approaches to test the effect of SGD on taxa and functional richness as well as community composition. We employed a regression approach to assess continuous changes in environment and communities along the SGD gradient. Indeed, recent reviews highlight the power of using regression-based experimental designs, which better characterize mechanisms compared to ANOVA designs (Idjadi and Edmunds 2006). We used individual general linear models (GLM) to determine the effect of SGD on the suite of functional and taxonomic diversity metrics while controlling for structural complexity, which could impact benthic taxonomic diversity by affecting settlement substrate (Idjadi and Edmunds 2006). To test the effect of structural complexity on %Taxon richness, %FE richness, and %FE volume in trait space, we used GLMs with mean structural complexity as the independent variable. We then calculated residuals of each diversity metric as a function of structural complexity. These residuals were used to test the impact of SGD on diversity above and beyond the effect of structural complexity. Due to the overall dominance of stony coral and fleshy macroalgae within the study site, as well as the ecological relevance of these functional groups to overall ecosystem health within a coral reef (Hatcher 1990; Hoegh-Guldberg et al. 2007), we additionally assessed the taxonomic and functional diversity of coral and fleshy macroalgae separately along the SGD gradient. All taxa used for the coral and macroalgae analyses were identified to the species level. Because there are several biogeochemical metrics commonly associated with SGD (i.e., variability in salinity, temperature, pH, and nutrients) (Taniguchi et al. 2019), we used a model-selection approach to determine the dominant SGD-related physicochemical variables and possible interactive effect of structure; selection involved comparing the AICC (Akaike information criterion, corrected for small sample size) of regression models. We tested both linear and polynomial regressions because communities exposed to various intensities of SGD may exhibit different relationships with diversity along the gradient in response to distinct biogeochemistry at each location.

We assessed functional-trait dispersion across surveyed species in multidimensional functional space using a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) with the Gower metric. The functional space was created by calculating pairwise distances between taxa for four functional groups. To test the effect of SGD on community composition along the gradient, we used generalized additive models (GAM) to fit nonlinear relationships to the full suite of SGD parameters on community composition. Taxa and FE composition dissimilarities were visualized through an nMDS with a Bray−Curtis dissimilarity index, and we used the ordisurf function in the vegan package, versions 2.6.4-2.6.8 (Oksanen et al. 2003) to create a smooth fit of each parameter in ordination space. All analyses were completed in R version 4.3.2 (R Core Team 2023), and all visuals were produced with ggplot2, versions 3.4.4-3.5.1 (Wickham 2016).


Data Processing Description

Data and code are available in the related dataset section (Barnas et al. 2025).


BCO-DMO Processing Description

- Imported "README_Variables.csv" into the BCO-DMO system
- Imported "uniquetaxa_matched.xlsx" into the BCO-DMO system
- Replaced "Taxa" values with accepted WoRMS values: Gracilaria verrucosa -> Gracilariopsis longissima, Heteractis magnifica -> Radianthus magnifica, Phaeophyta -> Phaeophyceae, Verongida -> Verongiida
- Exported primary file as "964240_v1_coral_benthic_comp_sgd.csv" and "uniquetaxa_matched.xlsx" as "taxonomy_coral_benthic_comp_sgd.csv"
- Checked all scientific names referenced in methods section and the methods section of related dataset using World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) Taxon Match.


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Data Files

File
964240_v1_coral_benthic_comp_sgd.csv
(Comma Separated Values (.csv), 1.11 MB)
MD5:c7d2a485c4d69eaec2656aa15370962b
Primary data file for dataset ID 964240, version 1

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Supplemental Files

File
Data.zip
(ZIP Archive (ZIP), 35.51 KB)
MD5:f432546a00ab76f008b60d4adfbbfe87
Multi-level directory with supplemental data files described in Data_Dictionary.csv
Data_Dictionary.csv
(Comma Separated Values (.csv), 4.50 KB)
MD5:16195e5869997aeec3683a305e8a6ddf
Description and purpose of files listed in the Data.zip supplemental package
taxonomy_coral_benthic_comp_sgd.csv
(Comma Separated Values (.csv), 4.64 KB)
MD5:9504a05dbf647000578f08b056e51d9a
Column "ScientificName" list of categories in columns "Taxa", listed along with "LSID", "Taxon_status", "AphiaID_accepted", "ScientificName_accepted" results given by the WoRMs taxa matching tool.

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Related Publications

Alvarez-Filip, L., Carricart-Ganivet, J. P., Horta-Puga, G., & Iglesias-Prieto, R. (2013). Shifts in coral-assemblage composition do not ensure persistence of reef functionality. Scientific Reports, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03486
Methods
Barnas, D. M., Zeff, M., & Silbiger, N. J. (2025). Submarine Groundwater Discharge Alters Benthic Community Composition and Functional Diversity on Coral Reefs. Diversity, 17(3), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17030161
Results
Bosserelle, C. (2014). Morphodynamics and sand transport on perched beaches. https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/morphodynamics-and-sand-transport-on-perched-beaches
Methods
Burnett, W. C., Aggarwal, P. K., Aureli, A., Bokuniewicz, H., Cable, J. E., Charette, M. A., Kontar, E., Krupa, S., Kulkarni, K. M., Loveless, A., Moore, W. S., Oberdorfer, J. A., Oliveira, J., Ozyurt, N., Povinec, P., Privitera, A. M. G., Rajar, R., Ramessur, R. T., Scholten, J., … Turner, J. V. (2006). Quantifying submarine groundwater discharge in the coastal zone via multiple methods. Science of The Total Environment, 367(2–3), 498–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.05.009
Methods
Carlot, J., Rouzé, H., Barneche, D. R., Mercière, A., Espiau, B., Cardini, U., Brandl, S. J., Casey, J. M., Pérez‐Rosales, G., Adjeroud, M., Hédouin, L., & Parravicini, V. (2022). Scaling up calcification, respiration, and photosynthesis rates of six prominent coral taxa. Ecology and Evolution, 12(3). Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8613
Methods
Chao, A., Chiu, C.-H., & Jost, L. (2014). Unifying Species Diversity, Phylogenetic Diversity, Functional Diversity, and Related Similarity and Differentiation Measures Through Hill Numbers. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 45(1), 297–324. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091540
Methods
Dennison, W. C., & Barnes, D. J. (1988). Effect of water motion on coral photosynthesis and calcification. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 115(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(88)90190-6
Methods
GATTUSO, J.-P., ALLEMAND, D., & FRANKIGNOULLE, M. (1999). Photosynthesis and Calcification at Cellular, Organismal and Community Levels in Coral Reefs: A Review on Interactions and Control by Carbonate Chemistry. American Zoologist, 39(1), 160–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/39.1.160
Methods
Hagedorn, B., Becker, M. W., & Silbiger, N. J. (2020). Evidence of freshened groundwater below a tropical fringing reef. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(7), 2501–2517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02191-1
Methods
Hagedorn, B., Becker, M. W., Silbiger, N. J., Maine, B., Justis, E., Barnas, D. M., & Zeff, M. (2024). Refining submarine groundwater discharge analysis through nonlinear quantile regression of geochemical time series. Journal of Hydrology, 645, 132145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132145
Methods
Hatcher, B. G. (1990). Coral reef primary productivity. A hierarchy of pattern and process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 5(5), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(90)90221-x https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(90)90221-X
Methods
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Mumby, P. J., Hooten, A. J., Steneck, R. S., Greenfield, P., Gomez, E., Harvell, C. D., Sale, P. F., Edwards, A. J., Caldeira, K., Knowlton, N., Eakin, C. M., Iglesias-Prieto, R., Muthiga, N., Bradbury, R. H., Dubi, A., & Hatziolos, M. E. (2007). Coral Reefs Under Rapid Climate Change and Ocean Acidification. Science, 318(5857), 1737–1742. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152509
Methods
Idjadi, J., & Edmunds, P. (2006). Scleractinian corals as facilitators for other invertebrates on a Caribbean reef. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 319, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps319117
Methods
Knee, K. L., Crook, E. D., Hench, J. L., Leichter, J. J., & Paytan, A. (2016). Assessment of Submarine Groundwater Discharge (SGD) as a Source of Dissolved Radium and Nutrients to Moorea (French Polynesia) Coastal Waters. Estuaries and Coasts, 39(6), 1651–1668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-016-0108-y
Methods
MCGILL, B., ENQUIST, B., WEIHER, E., & WESTOBY, M. (2006). Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(4), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002
Methods
Madin, J. S., Baird, A. H., Baskett, M. L., Connolly, S. R., & Dornelas, M. A. (2020). Partitioning colony size variation into growth and partial mortality. Biology Letters, 16(1), 20190727. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0727
Methods
Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., & Hubert, M. (1999). cluster: “Finding Groups in Data”: Cluster Analysis Extended Rousseeuw et al. [dataset]. In CRAN: Contributed Packages. The R Foundation. https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.cluster https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.cluster
Software
Mammola, S., Carmona, C. P., Guillerme, T., & Cardoso, P. (2021). Concepts and applications in functional diversity. Functional Ecology, 35(9), 1869–1885. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13882
Methods
Payri, C.E.; N’Yeurt, A.D.R.; Orempuller, J. Algae of French Polynesia; Au Vent de Îles Editions: Tahiti, French Polynesia, 2000. ISBN 9782909790824.
Methods
Pentecost, A. Calcification Processes in Algae and Cyanobacteria. In Calcareous Algae and Stromatolites; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, 1991; pp. 3–20. ISBN 9783642523373.
Methods
R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R v4.3.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
Software
Risk, M. J. (1972). Fish Diversity on a Coral Reef in the Virgin Islands. Atoll Research Bulletin, 153, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00775630.153.1
Methods
Roussel, J. R., Barber, C. B., Habel, K., Grasman, R., Gramacy, R., Mozharovskyi, P. & Sterratt, D. C. (2005). geometry: Mesh Generation and Surface Tessellation [dataset]. In CRAN: Contributed Packages. The R Foundation. https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.geometry https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.geometry
Software
Silbiger, N., Donahue, M., Hagedorn, B., Barnas, D., Jorissen, H., Kerlin, J., McClintock, R., Nixon, E., Sparagon, W., Zeff, M., & Nelson, C. (2023). Nutrient subsidies restructure coral reef dissolved carbon fluxes via biogeochemical cascades. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3094340/v1
Methods
Taniguchi, M., Dulai, H., Burnett, K. M., Santos, I. R., Sugimoto, R., Stieglitz, T., Kim, G., Moosdorf, N., & Burnett, W. C. (2019). Submarine Groundwater Discharge: Updates on Its Measurement Techniques, Geophysical Drivers, Magnitudes, and Effects. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00141
Methods
Teixidó, N., Gambi, M. C., Parravacini, V., Kroeker, K., Micheli, F., Villéger, S., & Ballesteros, E. (2018). Functional biodiversity loss along natural CO2 gradients. Nature Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07592-1
Methods
Villéger, S., Novack-Gottshall, P. M., & Mouillot, D. (2011). The multidimensionality of the niche reveals functional diversity changes in benthic marine biotas across geological time. Ecology Letters, 14(6), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01618.x
Methods
Wickham, H., Chang, W., Henry, L., Pedersen, T. L., Takahashi, K., Wilke, C., Woo, K., Yutani, H., Dunnington, D., & van den Brand, T. (2007). ggplot2: Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics [dataset]. In CRAN: Contributed Packages. The R Foundation. https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.ggplot2 https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.ggplot2
Software
Yachi, S., & Loreau, M. (1999). Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: The insurance hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(4), 1463–1468. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463
Methods
Zawada, K. J. A., Madin, J. S., Baird, A. H., Bridge, T. C. L., & Dornelas, M. (2019). Morphological traits can track coral reef responses to the Anthropocene. Functional Ecology, 33(6), 962–975. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13358
Methods
de Bello, F., Carmona, C. P., Mason, N. W. H., Sebastià, M., & Lepš, J. (2013). Which trait dissimilarity for functional diversity: trait means or trait overlap? Journal of Vegetation Science, 24(5), 807–819. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12008
Methods

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Related Datasets

Software
Barnas, D., Zeff, M., & Silbiger, N. (2025). Submarine Groundwater Discharge Alters Benthic Community Composition and Functional Diversity on Coral Reefs (Version 1.0.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.14921067 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14921067
Oksanen, J., Simpson, G. L., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O’Hara, R. B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., Szoecs, E., Wagner, H., Barbour, M., Bedward, M., Bolker, B., Borcard, D., Carvalho, G., Chirico, M., De Caceres, M., Durand, S., … Borman, T. (2001). vegan: Community Ecology Package [dataset]. In CRAN: Contributed Packages. The R Foundation. https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.vegan https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.vegan
Different Version
Barnas, D., Zeff, M., & Silbiger, N. (2025). Submarine Groundwater Discharge Alters Benthic Community Composition and Functional Diversity on Coral Reefs (Version 1.0.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.14921067 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14921067

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Parameters

ParameterDescriptionUnits
CowTagID

Individual survey location identifier (1-20 and a Seep location)

unitless
Date

Date (year-month-day) of in situ community survey

unitless
Taxa

Benthic taxa observed at each survey site

unitless
pcover

Proportional cover of each taxa at each survey site

percent
Taxon_Group

Phyla of each taxon observed at each survey site

unitless
Morph2

Morphology of each taxon observed at each survey site described as Branched (Br), Cushion-like (Cushion), Digitate (Dig), Encrusting (Enc), Filamentous (Fil), Foliose (Fol), Massive (Mas), Mushroom (Mush), Polypoid (Poly), Spherical (Sph), and Stolonial (Stol). 

unitless
Calc

Calcification strategy of each taxon observed at each survey site described as Non-calcified (NC), Articulated (AC), Non-articulated (Non-AC), or Hermatypic (Herm).

unitless
ER

Trophic group of each taxon observed at each survey site described as Autotrophy (Auto), Heterotrophy (Het), or Mixotrophy (Mix).

unitless
FE

Functional entity of each taxon observed at each survey site; a compilation of the unique functional traits assigned to the taxon from each functional group

unitless
PC1

PCoA axis 1

unitless
PC2

PCoA axis 2

unitless
PC3

PCoA axis 3

unitless
PC4

PCoA axis 4

unitless
Location

Indicates the coral reef site (Varari)

unitless
AlphaTag

Individual survey location identifier, alphabetized by linear distance from seepage point (Seep location, A, and B-T)

unitless
LiveCoral

Percent cover of live coral substrate

percent
DeadCoral

Percent cover of dead coral substrate

percent
Rubble

Percent cover of rubble substrate

percent
Sand

Percent cover of sand substrate

percent
lat

Latitude of survey locations recorded on a Garmin GPS

decimal degrees
lon

Longitude of survey locations recorded on a Garmin GPS

decimal degrees
meanRugosity

Average rugosity measured using a 2.03m link chain across 3 randomly chosen lines within the survey box of each survey location. Values range from 0-1, with 0 indicating higher substrate complexity and 1 indicating a flat surface

unitless
complexity

Average rugosity subtracted from 1 as an indication of structural complexity of the reef surface

unitless
Salinity

Salinity measured during the high and low tide in the day and nighttime; coefficient of variation (%) used for analyses

psu
Temperature

Temperature measured during the high and low tide in the day and nighttime at each survey location; coefficient of variation (%) used for analyses

degrees Celsius
pH

pH measured during the high and low tide in the day and nighttime at each survey location; coefficient of variation (%) used for analyses

unitless (pH scale)
Phosphate_umolL

Raw values of phosphate measured during the high and low tide in the day and nighttime at each survey location; coefficient of variation (%) used for analyses

umol/L
Silicate_umolL

Raw values silicate measured during the high and low tide in the day and nighttime at each survey location; coefficient of variation (%) used for analyses

umol/L
NN_umolL

Raw values of nitrate + nitrite (N+N) measured during the high and low tide in the day and nighttime at each survey location; coefficient of variation (%) used for analyses

umol/L
NbSp

Total tally of taxa per site

unitless
NbSpP

Proportional taxonomic richness

percent
NbFEs

Total tally of functional entities per site

unitless
NbFEsP

Proportional functional entity richness

percent
resSp

Complexity-normalized residuals of total taxonomic richness

unitless
resSpp

Complexity-normalized residuals of proportional taxonomic richness

percent
resFE

Complexity-normalized residuals of total functional entity richness

unitless
resFEp

Complexity-normalized residuals of proportional functional entity richness

percent
Community

Indicates whether the diversity metrics are representative of the "Full Community", "Stony Coral", or "Macroalgae"

unitless


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Instruments

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
photographed
Generic Instrument Name
Camera
Dataset-specific Description
Taxa unidentifiable in the field were photographed and fragmented or collected whole for later identification.
Generic Instrument Description
All types of photographic equipment including stills, video, film and digital systems.

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
snorkeling
Generic Instrument Name
Diving Mask and Snorkel
Dataset-specific Description
Benthic communities were surveyed via snorkeling at each survey location and at the SGD seepage point in June–July 2022. 
Generic Instrument Description
A diving mask (also half mask, dive mask or scuba mask) is an item of diving equipment that allows underwater divers, including, scuba divers, free-divers, and snorkelers to see clearly underwater. Snorkel: A breathing apparatus for swimmers and surface divers that allows swimming or continuous use of a face mask without lifting the head to breathe, consisting of a tube that curves out of the mouth and extends above the surface of the water.

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Transect tapes
Generic Instrument Name
Measuring Tape
Dataset-specific Description
Transect tapes (30m) for benthic composition quadrat parameters and points
Generic Instrument Description
A tape measure or measuring tape is a flexible ruler. It consists of a ribbon of cloth, plastic, fibre glass, or metal strip with linear-measurement markings. It is a common tool for measuring distance or length.

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
YSI Pro2030
Generic Instrument Name
Multi Parameter Portable Meter
Dataset-specific Description
Salinity, temperature, and pH were immediately measured using portable sensors (salinity accuracy ± 1.0% psu and precision = 0.1 psu, temperature accuracy ± 0.3 °C and precision = 0.1 °C, YSI Pro2030, Xylem Inc., Washington D.C, USA.; pH [total scale] accuracy ± 0.002 and precision = 0.001, tris-calibrated ROSSTM double junction electrode, Orion Star A325, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
Generic Instrument Description
An analytical instrument that can measure multiple parameters, such as pH, EC, TDS, DO and temperature with one device and is portable or hand-held.

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Seal Analytical AA3 HR Nutrient Analyzer
Generic Instrument Name
Seal Analytical AutoAnalyser 3HR
Dataset-specific Description
The samples were brought to the S-LAB at the University of Hawai‘i, where they were analyzed on a Seal Analytical AA3 HR Nutrient Analyzer (N+N: detection limit [DL] = 0.009 and coefficient of variation [CV] = 0.3%; PO43−: DL = 0.011 and CV = 0.2%; SiO32−: DL = 0.03 and CV = 0.5%). 
Generic Instrument Description
A fully automated Segmented Flow Analysis (SFA) system, ideal for water and seawater analysis. It comprises a modular system which integrates an autosampler, peristaltic pump, chemistry manifold and detector. The sample and reagents are pumped continuously through the chemistry manifold, and air bubbles are introduced at regular intervals forming reaction segments which are mixed using glass coils. The AA3 uses segmented flow analysis principles to reduce inter-sample dispersion, and can analyse up to 100 samples per hour using stable LED light sources.


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Project Information

RUI: Collaborative Research: Defining the biogeochemical context and ecological impacts of submarine groundwater discharge on coral reefs (Moorea SGD)

Coverage: Mo'orea, French Polynesia


NSF Award Abstract:
Submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) is the flow of water from land through the coastal seafloor into the nearby ocean. Approximately 13,000 cubic kilometers of groundwater is discharged into coastal environments every year, yet the effects of this fresh and often nutrient rich SGD are still poorly understood for coral reefs. This SGD input is driven by changes in precipitation, human land use, sea-level rise, tidal amplitude, and groundwater usage, many of which are rapidly changing with climate and human impacts. This project improves our understanding of SGD effects on coral reefs to better predict how both natural and human-induced changes will affect coastal ecosystem functioning in the future. Working in one of the most comprehensively studied coral reef ecosystems in the Pacific (Mo'orea, French Polynesia, home of the Mo'orea Coral Reef Ecosystem LTER); this project tests the influence of SGD on individual, community, and ecosystem-scale coral reef processes. Using mensurative studies, caging experiments, and a synthetic model, the investigators: 1) characterize SGD gradients and relate it to high resolution coral reef cover data, 2) determine how individual to ecosystem processes are influenced by SGD, and 3) develop a synthetic model to show how changes in SGD fluxes will alter reef ecosystem functioning. As SGD is a common feature on nearshore coral reefs worldwide, the results of this study have global implications for understanding the performance of coral reefs, which are essential economic, cultural, and scientific resources. This project is structured to provide training across multiple career levels, linking 13 undergraduate students, 2 graduate students, 2 senior personnel, 1 postdoctoral researcher, 1 female beginning lead investigator, and 2 senior co-investigators, with a focus on encouraging participation from underrepresented groups (e.g., through the Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian, Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander, and Hispanic-Serving Institutions of California State University Northridge, the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, and California State University Long Beach). The investigators work with local K-12 students and teachers in Mo'orea and collaborate with an artist-in-residence to communicate science to the broader public through interactive and immersive art experiences in Mo'orea, Miami, and Los Angeles.

SGD is a natural and understudied feature of many nearshore coral reef ecosystems, which can contribute substantial changes to marine biogeochemistry, with impacts for coastal organisms such as reef-building corals, macroalgae, and bioeroders. SGD may play a key role in coral reef ecosystem functioning because it alters key physicochemical parameters (e.g., temperature, salinity, and nutrient and carbonate chemistry) that substantially affect both biotic and abiotic processes on coral reefs. This project (i) characterizes the spatial extent and biogeochemical signal of SGD in Mo'orea, French Polynesia, (ii) identifies how SGD influences microbial processes, benthic organism growth rates and physiology, species interactions between corals, macroalgae, and herbivores, and net ecosystem calcification and production rates, and (iii) quantitatively assesses how changes in SGD fluxes will alter reef biogeochemistry and ecosystem functioning through an integrative modelling effort. Specifically, the hydrogeological, biogeochemical, and ecological data collected in this study are synthesized in a Bayesian structural equation model. This project characterizes and quantifies how SGD directly and indirectly affects ecosystem functioning via changes in biogeochemistry and altered individual to ecosystem responses, thereby providing a better capacity to track and predict alterations in reef ecosystem function.

This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.



[ table of contents | back to top ]

Funding

Funding SourceAward
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE)

[ table of contents | back to top ]