Sponge 3day VacuSIP Jan 2022

Website: https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/965557
Version: 1
Version Date: 2025-06-18

Project
» Collaborative Research: The Influence of Sponge Holobiont Metabolism on Coral Reef Dissolved Organic Matter and Reef Microorganisms (Sponge Holobiont DOM)
ContributorsAffiliationRole
Apprill, AmyWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI)Co-Principal Investigator
Easson, Cole G.Middle Tennessee State UniversityCo-Principal Investigator
Fiore, Cara L.Appalachian State UniversityCo-Principal Investigator
Reigel, Alicia M.Appalachian State UniversityScientist
Michaels, Ellen ChristineAppalachian State UniversityStudent
Rauch, ShannonWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO)BCO-DMO Data Manager

Abstract
Sponges are sessile filter-feeders that can process vast amounts of water and are known to influence the chemistry of the surrounding seawater. There has been limited work in understanding how sponges alter dissolved and particulate nutrients on coral reefs, but work is even further limited in understanding if and how sponges vary in how they process nutrients. Sponges may occasionally arrest pumping or there may be changes in which nutrients are removed or added as the water is processed by the sponge and its microbial symbiotic community. This work provides an initial examination of three common sponges in Caribbean reefs and how they alter their processing of dissolved and particulate nutrients over multiple days. Incurrent and excurrent seawater samples were collected for each of the three sponge species and processed for: inorganic nutrients, total organic carbon and total nitrogen, targeted metabolomics, and particulate matter by flow cytometry. Sponges were sampled from Looe Key reef in the southern Florida Keys. We found that two species, both of which are high microbial abundance sponges, Verongula rigida and the barrel sponge, Xestospongia muta, were fairly consistent in dissolved nutrient fluxes across individual sponges and across days. In contrast, the low microbial abundance sponge, Niphates digitalis, was highly variable across individuals and days. These results provide additional support for the large impact that sponges have in the dissolved nutrient profile on coral reefs and provide support for a species-specific impact. These results have implications for better understanding the influence of the sponge community on coral reef nutrient dynamics.


Coverage

Location: Looe Key Reef, National Keys Marine Sanctuary
Spatial Extent: Lat:24.545344 Lon:-81.40809
Temporal Extent: 2022-01-07 - 2022-01-13

Methods & Sampling

Incurrent/excurrent water samples were taken from three sponge species from the Florida Keys (USA) over two or three days using a modified version of the vacuSIP (Morganti et al. 2016). Briefly, acid-cleaned and combusted bottles were negatively pressurized and sealed. PEEK tubing lines were connected to the pressurized bottles via a needle, and this pulled seawater from the opening of the sponge ("excurrent") or nearby seawater ("incurrent") at a slow and steady rate to fill the bottles. Nutrient data from the seawater samples were compiled and organized by sponge species and water type (incurrent or excurrent) in an Excel file. Seawater samples from two sponge species (Niphates digitalis and Verongula rigida) were filtered through 0.2-micrometer (µm) polyethersulfone filters, while seawater from the sponge Xestspongia muta was filtered through 0.2 µm Teflon Omnipore filters. Filtrate was then saved for inorganic nutrients and those from X. muta were processed for dissolved organic matter composition using targeted metabolomics analysis. Flow cytometry of phytoplankton and bacteria data was collected from pre-filtered seawater and preserved in 0.5% paraformaldehyde final concentration. Seawater for total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) was also collected prior to filtration and was acidified to ~pH 2 using concentrated HCl. Metabolomics and TOC analysis were performed at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution at the Mass Spectrometry Facility.

Dissolved Organic Matter Extraction:
Filtered seawater was processed using PPL solid phase extraction following the protocol by Dittmar et al. (2008). Extracts were dried to nearly completeness, leaving a small viscous drop in the vial. These extracts were then shipped to WHOI for metabolomics analysis.

Targeted Metabolite Analysis by UPLC-MS:
DOM extracts were reconstituted in 200 microliters (μl) MilliQ water with 50 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) isotopically-labeled injection standards d2 biotin, d6 succinic acid, d4 cholic acid, and d7 indole 3 acetic acid. We used ultra-performance liquid chromatography (Accela Open Autosampler and Accela 1250 Pump, Thermo Scientific) coupled to a heated electrospray ionization source (H-ESI) and a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (TSQ Vantage, Thermo Scientific) operated under selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. We performed chromatographic separation with a Waters Acquity HSS T3 column (2.1 × 100 millimeters (mm), 1.8 μm) equipped with a Vanguard pre-column and maintained at 40 degrees Celsius (°C). We eluted the metabolites from the column with (A) 0.1% formic acid in water and (B) 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.5 milliliters per minute (mL min-1), according to the gradient: 0 min, 1% B; 1 min, 1%B; 3 min, 15%B; 6 min, 50%B; 9 min, 95%B; 10 min, 95%B; 10.2 min, 1%B; 12 min, 1%B (total run time = 12 min). Settings for source gases were 55 (sheath), 20 (auxiliary) and 0 (sweep), and these settings are presented in arbitrary units. The heated capillary temperature was 375 °C and the vaporizer temperature was 400 °C. For positive and negative modes, we performed separate autosampler injections of 5 μL each.

Flow Cytometry:
Samples were preserved and stored at -80°C until later batch analysis at the University of Hawaii SOEST Flow Cytometry Facility (www.soest.hawaii.edu/sfcf). Microbial cells were enumerated using flow cytometry (Selph, 2021). In brief, samples (0.1 mL) were thawed in batches, stained with the DNA dye Hoechst 34580 (1 microgram per milliliter (µg/mL) final), then run at 30 microliters per minute (µL min-1) on a Beckman-Coulter CytoFlex S flow cytometer, using lasers emitting at 375 nanometers (nm) (to detect Hoechst), 488 nm (for scatter and chlorophyll parameters), and 561 nm (for phycoerythrin). Resulting listmode files (FCS 3.0) were analyzed using FlowJo software (Becton Dickinson, v. 10.8.2) to distinguish microbial populations based on their fluorescence signals (chlorophyll, phycoerythrin, DNA), as well as forward and right-angle light scatter. Heterotrophic bacteria were distinguished from phytoplankton by their DNA signature and absence of pigment. Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus were separated from larger eukaryotic phytoplankton by their light scatter signatures, as well as their characteristic pigment and DNA signatures. Other phytoplankton (eukaryotes, mostly 2-20 µm pico- and nano-sized cells given the small volume analyzed) had higher light scatter and more chlorophyll fluorescence per cell.

Inorganic nutrients:
Inorganic nutrients included phosphate, nitrate+nitrite, nitrite, ammonia, and silicic acid. The phosphate method is a modification of the molybdenum blue procedure of Bernhardt and Wilhelms (1967), in which phosphate is determined as reduced phosphomolybdic acid employing hydrazine as the reductant. The nitrate + nitrite analysis uses the basic method of Armstrong et al. (1967), with modifications to improve the precision and ease of operation. Sulfanilamide and N-(1-Napthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride react with nitrite to form a colored diazo compound. For the nitrate + nitrite analysis, nitrate is first reduced to nitrite using an OTCR and imidazole buffer as described by Patton (1983). Nitrite analysis is performed on a separate channel, omitting the cadmium reductor and the buffer. The method is based on that of Armstrong et al. (1967) as adapted by Atlas et al. (1971). The addition of an acidic molybdate reagent forms silicomolybdic acid, which is then reduced by stannous chloride. This indophenol blue method is modified from ALPKEM RFA methodology which references Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, March 1984, EPA-600/4-79-020, "Nitrogen Ammonia", Method 350.1 (Colorimetric, Automated Phenate) A detailed description of the continuous segmented flow procedures used can be found in Gordon et. al. (1994).


Data Processing Description

Targeted Metabolomics:
Samples were analyzed in random order and injected pooled samples at regular intervals (every 8 samples). We monitored two SRM transitions per compound for quantification and confirmation; these transitions were optimized previously using authentic standards. We generated 8-point external calibration curves based on peak area for each compound. We converted raw data files from proprietary Thermo (.RAW) format to mzML using the msConvert tool (Chambers et al., 2012) prior to processing with El-MAVEN (Agrawal et al., 2019). Metabolite concentrations were provided from WHOI as raw data in nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) in the 200 microliters (μl) extract. We then converted the ng/ml values into total nanograms by multiplying by 0.2 then divided by the sample volume in liters to produce nanograms per liter (ng/L) concentrations. These concentrations were converted to micromolar concentrations using the formula weight for each metabolite.

Statistical Analysis:
Concentrations of dissolved nutrients (micromolar (μM)) and cells (cells per milliliter) were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis, depending on if the dataset met assumption of ANOVA, followed by pairwise comparisons (either Tukey HSD or Dunn test). Permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was also used to assess an effect of sample, sponge species, or day on a matrix of all nutrients following conversion of the data to z-score.


BCO-DMO Processing Description

- Imported original file "VacuSIP_3day_Jan22_For_BCO-DMO.xlsx" into the BCO-DMO system.
- Flagged "NA" as a missing data value (missing data are empty/blank in the final CSV file).
- Converted Date field to YYYY-MM-DD format.
- Renamed fields to comply with BCO-DMO naming conventions.
- Saved the final file as "965557_v1_sponge_3day_vacusip_jan2022.csv".


Problem Description

Missing samples:
Niphates digitalis excurrent samples 1-3 01/07/2022,
Niphates digitalis incurrent samples 1-3 1/7/2022,
Verongula rigida incurrent samples 1-3 01/10/2022.

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Related Publications

Agrawal, S., Kumar, S., Sehgal, R., George, S., Gupta, R., Poddar, S., Jha, A., & Pathak, S. (2019). El-MAVEN: A Fast, Robust, and User-Friendly Mass Spectrometry Data Processing Engine for Metabolomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9236-2_19
Methods
Armstrong, F. A. J., Stearns, C. R., & Strickland, J. D. H. (1967). The measurement of upwelling and subsequent biological process by means of the Technicon Autoanalyzer® and associated equipment. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 14(3), 381–389. doi:10.1016/0011-7471(67)90082-4
Methods
Atlas, E. L., Hager, S. W,, Gordon, L. I., & Park, P. K. (1971). A practical manual for use of the Technicon Autoanalyzer in sea water nutrient analyses. Oregon State University, Department of Oceanography. Technical report.
Methods
Bernhardt, H., and A. Wilhelms. 1967. The continuous determination of low level iron, soluble phosphate and total phosphate with the AutoAnalyzer. Technicon Symp. 1:385-89.
Methods
Chambers, M. C., Maclean, B., Burke, R., Amodei, D., Ruderman, D. L., Neumann, S., … Mallick, P. (2012). A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nature Biotechnology, 30(10), 918–920. doi:10.1038/nbt.2377
Methods
Dittmar, T., Koch, B., Hertkorn, N., & Kattner, G. (2008). A simple and efficient method for the solid-phase extraction of dissolved organic matter (SPE-DOM) from seawater. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 6(6), 230–235. doi:10.4319/lom.2008.6.230
Methods
Durand, M. D., & Olson, R. J. (1996). Contributions of phytoplankton light scattering and cell concentration changes to diel variations in beam attenuation in the equatorial Pacific from flow cytometric measurements of pico-, ultra- and nanoplankton. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 43(4–6), 891–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0645(96)00020-3
Methods
Gordon, L. I., J. C. Jennings, JR, A. A. Ross, and J. M. Krest. (1994). A suggested protocol for continuous flow analysis of seawater nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, nitrite, and silicic acid) in the WOCE Hydrographic Program and the Joint Global Ocean Fluxes Study. WHP Office Report 91-1. Revision 1, Nov. 1994. WOCE Hydrographic Program Office, Woods Hole, MA.
Methods
Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K., and Ehrhardt, M. (1983). Methods of Seawater Analysis. Verlag Chemia, Florida
Methods
Lomas, M. W., Steinberg, D. K., Dickey, T., Carlson, C. A., Nelson, N. B., Condon, R. H., & Bates, N. R. (2010). Increased ocean carbon export in the Sargasso Sea linked to climate variability is countered by its enhanced mesopelagic attenuation. Biogeosciences, 7(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-57-2010
Methods
Marie, D., Simon, N., & Vaulot, D. (2005). Phytoplankton Cell Counting by Flow Cytometry. Algal Culturing Techniques, 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012088426-1/50018-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088426-1/50018-4
Methods
Morganti, T., Yahel, G., Ribes, M., & Coma, R. (2016). VacuSIP, an Improved InEx Method for In Situ Measurement of Particulate and Dissolved Compounds Processed by Active Suspension Feeders. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 114. https://doi.org/10.3791/54221
Methods
Patton, C. J. (1983) Design, characterization and applications of a miniature continuous flow analysis system. Ph.D. Thesis, Mich. State Univ. U. Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Mich. 150 pp.
Methods
Vaulot, D., Courties, C., & Partensky, F. (1989). A simple method to preserve oceanic phytoplankton for flow cytometric analyses. Cytometry, 10(5), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990100519
Methods

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Parameters

ParameterDescriptionUnits
Sponge_species

Genus and species sample was taken from

unitless
Replicate_number

Number of sample taken for each species

unitless
Water_type

Type of water the sample was taken of: inhalant or exhalant

unitless
Day

Day of the survey

unitless
Site

Reef location for the survey

unitless
Depth

Depth of sample locations

meters
Volume

Volume of inhalant or exhallant water collected

milliliters (mL)
Date

Date of the survey

unitless
Latitude

latitude of the reef site

decimal degrees
Longitude

longitude of the reef site

decimal degrees
Total_sample_RU_after_blank_subtraction

Total Raman units in the sample minus the Raman units of the milliQ water blank

Raman units of water (RU)
M_C_ratio

M:C. Ratio of Coble Peak M (Marine Humic-like) to Cole Peak C (Visible Humic-like)

unitless
BIX

Biological Index meaning the tolerance values assigned to species.

biotic index score
HIX

Jumification index indicates the ratio between the humified and the non-humified portion of an organic substance

unitless
FI

Fluorescence Index used to distinguish a microbial (FI > 1.8) or terrestrial (FI < 1.2) source

unitless
Ultra_Violet_Humic_like

Coble Peak A - Flourescent Dissolved Organic Matter (fDOM)

Ramen Units (R.U.)
Marine_Humic_like

Coble Peak M - Flourescent Dissolved Organic Matter (fDOM)

Ramen Units (R.U.)
Visible_Humic_like

Coble Peak C - Flourescent Dissolved Organic Matter (fDOM)

Ramen Units (R.U.)
Tryptophan_like

Coble Peak T - Flourescent Dissolved Organic Matter (fDOM)

Ramen Units (R.U.)
Tyrosine_like

Coble Peak B - Flourescent Dissolved Organic Matter (fDOM)

Ramen Units (R.U.)
Phenylalanine_like

Coble Peak F - Flourescent Dissolved Organic Matter (fDOM)

Ramen Units (R.U.)
Lignin_like

Peaks corresponding to lignin phenols as in Herenes et al. 2009

Raman units of water (RU)
TOC

Total organic carbon

various
TN

Micromolar concentration of total nitrogen

Micromolar (uM)
Phosphate

Concentration of dissolved phosphate in micromoles per liter of sample water

micromoles per liter (umol/l)
Nitrate_plus_Nitrite

Concentration of dissolved inorganic (nitrate+nitrite) in micromoles per liter of sample water

micromoles per liter (umol/l)
Silicate

Concentration of dissolved silicate in micromoles per liter of sample water

micromoles per liter (umol/l)
Nitrite

Concentration of dissolved nitrite in micromoles per liter of sample water

micromoles per liter (umol/l)
Ammonium

Concentration of dissolved ammonium in micromoles per liter of sample water

micromoles per liter (umol/l)
Prochlorococcus

Prochlorococcus

cells per milliliter
Synechococcus

Synechococcus

cells per milliliter
LowPE_Synechococcus

Low Phycoerythrin Synechococcus

cells per milliliter
Picoeukaryotes

Photosynthetic eaukaryotes

cells per milliliter
Heterotrophic_bacteria

heterotrophic (non-pigmented) bacteria

cells per milliliter
_2_3_dihydroxypropane_1_sulfonate

2,3-dihydroxypropane-1-sulfonate. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
_2_3_dihydroxybenzoic_acid

2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
_2prime_deoxycytidine

2'-deoxycytidine. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
_2_methyl_4_oxopentanoic

2'-deoxycytidine. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
_2_Keto_3_deoxy_6_phosphogluconate

2-Keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
_3_methyl_2_oxobutanoic_acid

3-methyl-2-oxobutanoic acid. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
_4_aminobenzoic_acid

4-aminobenzoic acid. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
_4_methyl_2_oxopentanoic_acid

4-methyl-2-oxopentanoic acid. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
_6_hydroxymelatonin

6-hydroxymelatonin. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
adenine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
adenosine_5prime_monophosphate

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
adenosine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
alanine_isom_sarcosine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
_4_amino_5_aminomethyl_2_methylpyrimidine

4-amino-5-aminomethyl-2-methylpyrimidine. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
anthranilate

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
arginine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
argininosuccinic_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
caffeine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
carnitine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
choline

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
ciliatine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
citric_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
citrulline

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
cyanocobalamin

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
cysteine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
cytidine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
cytosine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
desthiobiotin

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
chitobiose

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
dimethylsulfoniopropionate

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
D_fructose_1_6_bisphosphate

D-fructose 1,6-bisphosphate. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
fructose_6_phosphate

fructose 6-phosphate. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
fumaric_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
_aminobutyric_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
D_glucosamine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
glucose_6_phosphate

glucose 6-phosphate. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
glutamic_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
glutamine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
glutathione

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
sn_glycerol_3_phosphate

sn-glycerol 3-phosphate. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
glycine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
glycine_betaine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
guanine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
guanosine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
_4_methyl_5_thiazoleethanol

4-methyl-5-thiazoleethanol. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
histadine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
histidinol

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
homocysteine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
hydroxocobalamin

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
hydroxyproline

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
hypoxanthine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
inosine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
inosine_5prime_monophosphate

inosine 5'-monophosphate. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
isoleucine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
kynurenine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
leucine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
lumichrome

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
malic_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
methionine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
methylmalonic_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
_5prime_methylthioadenosine

5'-methylthioadenosine. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
n_acetyl_glucosamine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
N_acetyl_D_glucosamine_6_phosphate

N-acetyl-D-glucosamine 6-phosphate. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
n_acetyl_glutamic_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
n_acetyl_muramic_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
phosphoserine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
ornithine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
pantothenic_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
phenylalanine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
proline

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
riboflavin

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
D_Ribose_5_phosphate

D-Ribose 5-phosphate. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
serine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
taurocholic_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
spermidine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
succinic_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
sucrose

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
syringic_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
thiamine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
threonine_homoserine

threonine / homoserine. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
thymidine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
chitotriose

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
tryptophan

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
tyrosine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
uric_acid

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
uridine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
uridine_5prime_monophosphate

uridine 5'-monophosphate. Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
valine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
xanthine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)
xanthosine

Dissolved organic metabolite; Concentration in nanograms per liter of sample

nanograms per liter (ng/l)


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Instruments

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Alpkem RFA 300
Generic Instrument Name
Alpkem RFA300
Dataset-specific Description
Inorganic nutrients measured using Technicon AutoAnalyzer II™ components were used to measure phosphate and ammonium; and Alpkem RFA 300™ components were used for silicic acid, nitrate plus nitrite, and nitrite.
Generic Instrument Description
A rapid flow analyser (RFA) that may be used to measure nutrient concentrations in seawater. It is an air-segmented, continuous flow instrument comprising a sampler, a peristaltic pump which simultaneously pumps samples, reagents and air bubbles through the system, analytical cartridge, heating bath, colorimeter, data station, and printer. The RFA-300 was a precursor to the smaller Alpkem RFA/2 (also RFA II or RFA-2).

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Beckman-Coulter CytoFLEX S flow cytometer
Generic Instrument Name
Flow Cytometer
Dataset-specific Description
A Beckman-Coulter CytoFLEX S flow cytometer was used to analyze all samples. This instrument is equipped with four lasers emitting light in spatially separated pathways at 375 nm (60 mW), 405 nm (80 mW), 488 nm (50 mW), and 561 nm (30 mW). Acquisition software was CytExpert (v. 2.3.1.22).
Generic Instrument Description
Flow cytometers (FC or FCM) are automated instruments that quantitate properties of single cells, one cell at a time. They can measure cell size, cell granularity, the amounts of cell components such as total DNA, newly synthesized DNA, gene expression as the amount messenger RNA for a particular gene, amounts of specific surface receptors, amounts of intracellular proteins, or transient signalling events in living cells. (from: http://www.bio.umass.edu/micro/immunology/facs542/facswhat.htm)

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Technicon AutoAnalyzer II
Generic Instrument Name
Technicon AutoAnalyzer II
Dataset-specific Description
Inorganic nutrients measured using Technicon AutoAnalyzer II™ components were used to measure phosphate and ammonium; and Alpkem RFA 300™ components were used for silicic acid, nitrate plus nitrite, and nitrite.
Generic Instrument Description
A rapid flow analyzer that may be used to measure nutrient concentrations in seawater. It is a continuous segmented flow instrument consisting of a sampler, peristaltic pump, analytical cartridge, heating bath, and colorimeter. See more information about this instrument from the manufacturer.

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
ultra-performance liquid chromatography (Accela Open Autosampler and Accela 1250 Pump, Thermo Scientific)
Generic Instrument Name
Ultra high-performance liquid chromatography
Dataset-specific Description
Targeted metabolomics were measured using the ultra-performance liquid chromatography (Accela Open Autosampler and Accela 1250 Pump, Thermo Scientific) coupled to a heated electrospray ionization source (H-ESI) and a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (TSQ Vantage, Thermo Scientific) operated under selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode  at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI). 
Generic Instrument Description
Ultra high-performance liquid chromatography: Column chromatography where the mobile phase is a liquid, the stationary phase consists of very small (< 2 microm) particles and the inlet pressure is relatively high.


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Project Information

Collaborative Research: The Influence of Sponge Holobiont Metabolism on Coral Reef Dissolved Organic Matter and Reef Microorganisms (Sponge Holobiont DOM)

Coverage: Caribbean Sea


NSF Award Abstract:
The seawater around coral reefs is typically low in nutrients, yet coral reefs are teeming with life and are often compared to oases in a desert. Life exists in these 'marine deserts' in large part, due to symbiotic associations between single-celled microbes and invertebrates such as corals and sponges. The concentration and type of dissolved organic matter (DOM), a complex pool of organic nutrients such as amino acids, vitamins, and other diverse compounds, also affects the health of coral reefs. The composition of DOM on coral reefs is linked to both the composition of free-living microbes in the seawater and to the nutrition of filter-feeding organisms, such as corals and sponges. However, the factors that influence the composition of DOM on coral reefs and the consequences of how it changes are not well understood. Recent work suggests that sponges could have a significant impact on the composition of reef dissolved organic nutrients, depending on sponge species due to differences in filtration capacity and in their symbiotic microbial communities. This project characterizes how diverse sponge species process DOM on coral reefs and determines the impacts of this processing on the free-living microbial community. Seawater is collected from sponges (pre- and post- sponge filtration) on coral reefs in the relatively pristine region of Curacao, and incubation experiments measure the impact of sponge filtration on the growth of the free-living microbial community. The organic nutrients of seawater samples are analyzed using cutting-edge techniques to distinguish the types of nutrients that are processed by sponges. The incubation experiments, using free-living microbes collected from the coral reef, quantify the impact of sponge filtration on the growth and composition of this community. This project provides fundamental understanding of how sponges contribute to the base of the coral reef food web. As the human-driven impacts continue to alter the composition of organisms on reefs, this understanding is necessary to predict changes to reef microbial food webs and is thus essential for scientists, reef managers, and policy decision makers. This project trains undergraduate students and a postdoctoral scholar and contributes to undergraduate and K-12 education through development of sponge-centric lessons that focus on local U.S. east coast aquatic environments as well as coral reef ecosystems.

Sponges vary in their capacity to filter seawater and in their associated microbial communities, leading to diverse metabolic strategies that often coexist in one habitat. While it is well-established that sponges are important in processing dissolved organic matter (DOM), an important reservoir of reduced carbon compounds, and transferring this energy to benthic food webs, there has been limited work to understand the consequences of sponge processing on the composition of coral reef DOM and on pelagic food webs. Specifically, while studies have shown that exudates of corals and algae select for specific groups of picoplankton (autotrophic and heterotrophic, respectively), similar data for sponges are required to understand the multiple factors that shape the composition of DOM and of the picoplankton community on coral reefs. Thus, this project is aimed at addressing a major knowledge gap of the role of sponge-derived DOM (sponge exometabolome) in coral reef biogeochemistry. An in situ sampling design targeting prominent Caribbean sponges and picoplankton incubation experiments is coupled to address both the composition of sponge exometabolomes and delineate shifts in the picoplankton community derived from sponge exometabolomes. Molecular-level changes to seawater DOM by sponge processing and the impact of these changes on the overall coral reef DOM profile is assessed with two DOM analysis techniques: a commonly used fluorometry technique (fDOM analysis) and with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Additionally, microbiome and functional gene profiling, growth metrics, and nutrient analyses are employed to assess changes in the picoplankton community in response to sponge exometabolomes. Advanced data analysis techniques then synthesize data generated by each approach to provide novel insight on a poorly uncharacterized biogeochemical pathway on coral reefs. The work outlined here represents entirely novel information on the impact of sponge metabolism on the composition of DOM, sheds light on biologically important molecules involved in benthic-pelagic coupling, and importantly, generates data using standardized methods, thus facilitating comparison to previous and future DOM datasets.

This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.



[ table of contents | back to top ]

Funding

Funding SourceAward
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE)

[ table of contents | back to top ]