http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/999251 eng; USA utf8 dataset Highest level of data collection, from a common set of sensors or instrumentation, usually within the same research project Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) Unavailable 508-289-2009 WHOI MS#36 Woods Hole MA 02543 USA info@bco-dmo.org http://www.bco-dmo.org Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided. pointOfContact 2026-05-22 ISO 19115-2 Geographic Information - Metadata - Part 2: Extensions for Imagery and Gridded Data ISO 19115-2:2009(E) Oxidation data of whole terrestrial organic matter samples (soils) collected .... 2026-05-22 publication 2026-05-22 revision BCO-DMO Linked Data URI 2026-05-22 creation http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/999251 Patrick G. Hatcher Old Dominion University principalInvestigator Aleksandar I. Goranov Old Dominion University principalInvestigator Ann Pearson Harvard University principalInvestigator Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) Unavailable 508-289-2009 WHOI MS#36 Woods Hole MA 02543 USA info@bco-dmo.org http://www.bco-dmo.org Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided. publisher Cite this dataset as: Goranov, A. I., Hatcher, P. G., Pearson, A., Carter, S. J. (2026) Oxidation data of whole terrestrial organic matter samples (soils) collected .... Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2026-05-22 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/999251 [access date] Oxidation data terrestrial organic matter Dataset Description: Methods and Sampling: &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hillsborough Soil&lt;/strong&gt;: a riverbank soil of the Hillsborough River (Florida). The river arises from the Green Swamp, also known as the “Heart of the Floridan Aquifer”, and flows 60 miles to an outlet in the city of Tampa on Hillsborough Bay. Its watershed was formerly covered by a rich, old-growth forest of Bald Cypress, Longleaf Pine, and Sand Live Oak. After decades of logging, the watershed’s cover has shifted to recently grown Water Ash and Water Locust trees. The soil was collected on 02 April 2019 at coordinates 28° 05′ 16.8″ N and 82° 20′ 56.3″ W. After removal of large debris, the soil was homogenized, sieved, oven-dried at 105 °C, and stored in the dark to prevent degradation during storage.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Santa Fe Soil&lt;/strong&gt;: a riverbank soil of the Santa Fe River (Florida). The river arises from Lake Santa Fe in northern Florida and flows westward for 75 miles until it empties into the Suwannee River. The Santa Fe River is a slow-flowing river in a heavily forested watershed (mainly with Bald Cypress). The soil was collected on 03 April 2019 at coordinates 29° 55′ 22.8″ N and 82° 25′ 37.8″ W. After removal of large debris, the peat was homogenized, sieved, oven-dried at 105 °C, and stored in the dark to prevent degradation during storage.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Elliott Soil&lt;/strong&gt;: a standardized fertile prairie soil purchased from the International Humic Substances Society (IHSS). This sample was obtained from an undisturbed area on the grounds of the Joliet Army Ammunition Plant near Joliet, Illinois, currently managed by the US Forest Service as the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie Reserve. It is a poorly drained soil on moraines and till plains having loess or silty clay loam glacial till.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Caitlin Soil&lt;/strong&gt;: a deep, moderately well drained silt loam soil on a 2% till plain in a cultivated field in Ogle County, Illinois. It is a fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Oxyaquic Argiudoll. The soil was sampled and standardized by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The soil is formed in loess or other silty material and in the underlying loamy calcareous till (slope ranging from 0 to 15%).&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Sharpsburg Soil&lt;/strong&gt;: a deep, moderately well-drained silty clay loam soil formed in loess in Lancaster County, Nebraska. It is a fine, smectitic, mesic Typic Argiudoll. The soil was sampled and standardized by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. This soil is formed on interfluve and hill slopes on uplands (slope ranging from 0 to 18%) and on treads and risers on stream terraces in river valleys.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Pahokee Peat&lt;/strong&gt;: a standardized peat soil purchased from the IHSS. It is an agricultural soil of the Florida Everglades obtained from the University of Florida Belle Glade Research Station. This is a poorly drained soil formed by organic deposits from freshwater marshes accumulating over limestone bedrock.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Okefenokee Peat&lt;/strong&gt;: a peat from the largest blackwater swamp in North America. This is a highly acidic (pH 3 to 4) low-nutrient environment (Murray &amp;amp; Hodson, 1984). Its Spodosol soils are formed by the deposits of muck and peat mixed with fine salt and silt.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Dismal Swamp Peat&lt;/strong&gt;: a peat from a blackwater wetland in Virginia that has high iron loadings. Its hydric soils are formed under repeated saturation, long enough to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper horizons. The peat is formed by fast accumulation of carbon and slow decomposition yielding an organic-rich peat (Sleeter et al., 2017).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Oxidation experiments. &lt;/strong&gt;Oxidation of TOM samples was performed by suspending 2 g of dried material (105 °C for 12 h) in 10 mL of 1 M H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; (Fisher, 30%), with iron concentrations unperturbed from the native sample compositions (Table 1 of the associated publication, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c12913). Control experiments were done similarly but with ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm). Experiments were performed in acid-cleaned and pre-combusted 20 mL glass vials, which were kept open to the air to ensure constant aeration and steady gas release, avoiding pressure buildup. As the eight soil samples were largely insoluble in water, once the aqueous H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; was added to the soils, acid-cleaned and pre-combusted rods were used to break any formed clumps and homogeneously distribute the peroxide solution. The formed suspensions were let react for 48 h at room temperature in a dark fume hood (vials were covered with a large KimWipe). Then, the peroxide solution was evaporated for 12 h at 105 °C to retain the particulate and dissolved components and also to quench the oxidation reactions for obtaining samples at exact time points.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Considering that the oxidation had continued to occur during sample drying, the total oxidation is estimated to be 60 h (2.5 days) per time point. After drying, a sample was sacrificed, and the remaining samples were used for furtheroxidation by adding new 10 mL of 1 M H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; for another 2.5 days of oxidation. This is graphically explained in Figure S1 in the Supporting Information (SI) of the associated publication (DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c12913) &amp;nbsp;Thus, oxidation was subsequently performed in six cycles for a total oxidation time of 15 days. Section 1 of the SI of the associated publication at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c12913 includes more details on the oxidation protocol, justifications for the choices of experimental conditions, and results from ancillary control experiments (Figure S2 of the associated publication at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c12913) and milder oxidation studies with 0.1 M H2O2 (Figure S3 of the associated publication at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c12913). In summary, the in vitro experimental conditions were chosen to ensure that the TOM samples experience a strong oxidation gradient that will yield significant carbon losses (minimum of 66% and above 90%). This would allow for testing if the carbon isotopic composition, C/N ratios, and bulk organic structure become altered at significant carbon losses comparative to carbon losses characteristic for TOM export from land to estuaries and the open ocean (∼66%) and to deep sediments (above 95%).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Elemental and Isotopic Characterization&lt;/strong&gt;. Oxidized samples were homogenized and dried at 105 &lt;sup&gt;O&lt;/sup&gt;C prior to analysis. Elemental analysis as described below was performed to acquire total nitrogen (TN) content on unacidified samples. Then, samples were digested with 20% HCl to remove refractory carbonates such as siderite (Larson et al., 2008). The acid was removed by freeze-drying and the samples were ground into fine powders. They were then used for total organic carbon (TOC) and isotopic composition (δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C) analyses. &amp;nbsp;Sample preparation prior to TOC, TN, and δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C was done by wrapping weighed amounts of sample in tin capsules. Analysis was performed using a Thermo-Scientific Flash EA instrument (combustion at 1010 °C) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector and a Delta V Plus isotope-ratio mass spectrometer. The instrument's performance is validated daily by analysis of standards (mentioned below). TOC and TN values were obtained in triplicate (technical replicates), while δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C values were measured three times on the same sample (instrumental replicates) and averaged into a single measurement. TOC values were obtained after calibration with the isotopic standards below while TN values were obtained after calibration with nicotinamide and aspartic acid. Carbon and nitrogen peak integrations are done automatically by the instrument and peak areas are related to C or N amounts using calibration curves in Excel. δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C values determined by the isotope-ratio mass spectrometer and computed by its software were peak-size-corrected and scale-corrected (in Excel using calibration curves) using laboratory and authentic reference standards (glutamic acid: δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C = −13.90‰; USGS40: δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C = −26.39‰; USGS41a: δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C = +36.55‰; and tyrosine: δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C = −24.90‰). δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C results are reported in delta notation relative to that of Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite. C/N ratios were determined by the formula (TOC/1.00784)/(TN/12.011). Residual carbon amounts after the oxidation were determined by dividing the the mass of carbon in the oxidized sample divided by the mass of carbon in the control sample. Mass of carbon is determined by multiplying the mass of the sample by the corresponding TOC value.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This method yielded the&amp;nbsp;&quot;Residual carbon, %&quot;, &quot;Stable carbon isotopic signature (δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C)&quot;, and &quot;Carbon-to-nitrogen ratio&quot; reported in the dataset.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Structural Characterization by &lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C Solid-State NMR&lt;/strong&gt;. xidized samples were homogenized and dried at 105 OC prior to analysis. Samples were packed in a 4 mm zirconia (ZrO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;) rotor with a polychlorotrifluoroethylene (Kel-F) cap. Analysis was done on a 400 MHz (9.4 T) Bruker BioSpin AVANCE II spectrometer fitted with a 4 mm magic angle spinning probe at the College of Sciences Major Instrumentation Cluster (COSMIC) facility at Old Dominion University (Norfolk, VA). The instrument's performance is validated regularly by analysis of glycine, adamantane, and/or hexamethylbenzene. One-dimensional &lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C NMR spectra were acquired using the nearly quantitative multipulse cross-polarization (multiCP) pulse program (Johnson &amp;amp; Schmidt-Rohr, 2014). Samples were spun at the magic angle at 14 kHz and analyzed using a relaxation delay of 1 s, 3000 scans, five cross-polarization segments, and a total contact time of 3.30 ms. The obtained spectra were phased, calibrated to an external glycine standard, and multiplied by an exponential window function (EM) of 200 Hz. Spectra were then baseline-corrected and integrated in the following ranges: 0−45 ppm (methyl and methylene); 45−60 ppm (αC in peptides); 60−95 (O-alkyl); 95−110 ppm (anomeric C), 110−145 ppm (aryl), 145−165 ppm (aryl-O), and 165−215 ppm (CO). All data were processed using the Bruker TopSpin 4.0.7 software.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This method yielded the NMR spectra reported in the manuscript.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; Funding provided by NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) Award Number: OCE-2346285 Award URL: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/show-award?AWD_ID=2346285 onGoing Patrick G. Hatcher Old Dominion University 614-323-8799 4402 Elkhorn Ave. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Norfolk VA 23529 USA phatcher@odu.edu pointOfContact Aleksandar I. Goranov Old Dominion University 3000A Chemistry Building 4501 Elkhorn Ave. Norfolk VA 23529 USA aleksandar.i.goranov@gmail.com pointOfContact Ann Pearson Harvard University 617-384-8392 Hoffman Lab G13 20 Oxford St. Cambridge MA 02138 USA pearson@eps.harvard.edu pointOfContact asNeeded Dataset Version: 1 Unknown Soil Concentration_H2O2_M Oxidation_time_point Time_oxidation_days Residual_carbon_pct delta13C CN_ratio General_location Collection_Date Collection_Lat Collection_Lon Source Notes Thermo Scientific Delta V Plus isotope-ratio mass spectrometer Thermo Scientific Flash EA elemental analyzer theme None, User defined sample type Hydrogen Peroxide time_point incubation time or duration Elemental carbon (C) Carbon 13 to Carbon 12 ratio of TCO2 Carbon to Nitrogen ratio (C:N) region date latitude longitude sample description comments featureType BCO-DMO Standard Parameters Thermo Fisher Scientific DELTA V Advantage isotope ratio mass spectrometer Thermo Fisher Scientific Flash EA 1112 elemental analyzer instrument BCO-DMO Standard Instruments otherRestrictions otherRestrictions Access Constraints: none. Use Constraints: Please follow guidelines at: http://www.bco-dmo.org/terms-use Distribution liability: Under no circumstances shall BCO-DMO be liable for any direct, incidental, special, consequential, indirect, or punitive damages that result from the use of, or the inability to use, the materials in this data submission. If you are dissatisfied with any materials in this data submission your sole and exclusive remedy is to discontinue use. EAGER: The camouflaging of terrigenous organic matter as marine organic matter through hydroxyl radical oxidation via the dark Fenton reaction https://osprey.bco-dmo.org/project/941590 EAGER: The camouflaging of terrigenous organic matter as marine organic matter through hydroxyl radical oxidation via the dark Fenton reaction <p><em>NSF Award Abstract:</em><br /> Organic carbon in the ocean is made-up of materials delivered by riverine runoff from land and marine sources. However, even though a large amount of land-derived organic carbon enters the ocean from rivers, most carbon in the ocean appears to be from marine sources. This has led scientists to conclude that land-derived carbon is not transported far into the ocean. This EAGER project aims to test this assumption. The team of scientists will examine whether chemical reactions alter the composition of land-derived organic carbon in a way that makes it look like marine organic carbon. If this proves true, the results could explain why land-derived organic carbon is difficult to identify in the ocean and could lead to a reconsideration of present carbon budgets and models. The scientists will perform experiments using land-derived carbon collected from major river systems throughout the world. Samples will be introduced to reactive oxygen species (mainly hydroxyl radicals) and iron in the dark under conditions that occur in nature. Reaction rates and changes in the composition of the organic matter will be monitored during and following the experiments. This EAGER project provides research training and valuable professional development experience for an early career researcher who has not received prior support from NSF. Undergraduate students enrolled in STEM and REU programs at the lead institutions will participate in the research.</p> <p>This EAGER project examines the hypothesis that hydroxyl radicals generated during dark Fenton reactions react with terrigenous organic matter to produce organic matter that is compositionally and isotopically similar to marine organic matter. The PIs will test this hypothesis using environmentally relevant concentrations of hydroxyl radical and terrestrial organic matter samples collected from several large-scale terrestrial riverine systems. The PIs will use multiple methods to characterize bulk organic matter (infrared/nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy), its molecular composition (electrospray ionization Fourier Transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (ESI FT-ICR MS), and stable isotope values of carbon and nitrogen (δ13C, δ15N) of dissolved and particulate organic matter pools before, during and following the experiments. This study explores an untested, but potentially transformative hypothesis that could alter existing paradigms about the fate of terrestrial organic matter in the ocean. Results from this study could revise understanding of the contributions of terrigenous organic matter to the ocean carbon cycle. The project would provide research and professional development opportunities for an early career investigator who has not received prior NSF support (co-PI Goranov). Undergraduates enrolled in REU and STEM training programs at the PIs’ home institutions would participate in the research.</p> <p>This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.</p> Fenton oxidation largerWorkCitation project eng; USA oceans -82.427167 -82.348972 28.088 29.923 2026-05-22 0 BCO-DMO catalogue of parameters from Oxidation data of whole terrestrial organic matter samples (soils) collected .... Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) Unavailable 508-289-2009 WHOI MS#36 Woods Hole MA 02543 USA info@bco-dmo.org http://www.bco-dmo.org Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided. pointOfContact http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002730.rdf Name: Soil Units: unitless Description: <p>Name of the soil used in the oxidation experiment</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002731.rdf Name: Concentration_H2O2_M Units: molarity (M) Description: <p>The concentration of hydrogen peroxide used in the oxidation experiment</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002732.rdf Name: Oxidation_time_point Units: unitless Description: <p>The time point at which the oxidation was stopped</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002733.rdf Name: Time_oxidation_days Units: days Description: <p>Duration of the oxidation, equal to the oxidation time point (0 through 6) times 2.5 days</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002734.rdf Name: Residual_carbon_pct Units: percentage (%) Description: <p>The amount of carbon remaining after oxidation relative to the control sample (a fraction)</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002735.rdf Name: delta13C Units: per mille (‰) Description: <p>The ratio of 13C atoms to 12C atoms in a sample normalized to a standard</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002736.rdf Name: CN_ratio Units: unitless Description: <p>The amount of carbon (in mol) relative to the amount of nitrogen (in mol) in the sample</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002737.rdf Name: General_location Units: unitless Description: <p>General sampling location</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002738.rdf Name: Collection_Date Units: unitless Description: <p>Collection date (if available)</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002739.rdf Name: Collection_Lat Units: decimal degrees Description: <p>Collection latitude (if available)</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002741.rdf Name: Collection_Lon Units: decimal degrees Description: <p>Collection latitude (if available)</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002743.rdf Name: Source Units: unitless Description: <p>Sample source</p> http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset-parameter/1002744.rdf Name: Notes Units: unitless Description: <p>General notes on sample</p> GB/NERC/BODC > British Oceanographic Data Centre, Natural Environment Research Council, United Kingdom Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) Unavailable 508-289-2009 WHOI MS#36 Woods Hole MA 02543 USA info@bco-dmo.org http://www.bco-dmo.org Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided. pointOfContact https://osprey.bco-dmo.org/dataset/999251/data/download download onLine dataset &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hillsborough Soil&lt;/strong&gt;: a riverbank soil of the Hillsborough River (Florida). The river arises from the Green Swamp, also known as the “Heart of the Floridan Aquifer”, and flows 60 miles to an outlet in the city of Tampa on Hillsborough Bay. Its watershed was formerly covered by a rich, old-growth forest of Bald Cypress, Longleaf Pine, and Sand Live Oak. After decades of logging, the watershed’s cover has shifted to recently grown Water Ash and Water Locust trees. The soil was collected on 02 April 2019 at coordinates 28° 05′ 16.8″ N and 82° 20′ 56.3″ W. After removal of large debris, the soil was homogenized, sieved, oven-dried at 105 °C, and stored in the dark to prevent degradation during storage.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Santa Fe Soil&lt;/strong&gt;: a riverbank soil of the Santa Fe River (Florida). The river arises from Lake Santa Fe in northern Florida and flows westward for 75 miles until it empties into the Suwannee River. The Santa Fe River is a slow-flowing river in a heavily forested watershed (mainly with Bald Cypress). The soil was collected on 03 April 2019 at coordinates 29° 55′ 22.8″ N and 82° 25′ 37.8″ W. After removal of large debris, the peat was homogenized, sieved, oven-dried at 105 °C, and stored in the dark to prevent degradation during storage.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Elliott Soil&lt;/strong&gt;: a standardized fertile prairie soil purchased from the International Humic Substances Society (IHSS). This sample was obtained from an undisturbed area on the grounds of the Joliet Army Ammunition Plant near Joliet, Illinois, currently managed by the US Forest Service as the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie Reserve. It is a poorly drained soil on moraines and till plains having loess or silty clay loam glacial till.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Caitlin Soil&lt;/strong&gt;: a deep, moderately well drained silt loam soil on a 2% till plain in a cultivated field in Ogle County, Illinois. It is a fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Oxyaquic Argiudoll. The soil was sampled and standardized by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The soil is formed in loess or other silty material and in the underlying loamy calcareous till (slope ranging from 0 to 15%).&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Sharpsburg Soil&lt;/strong&gt;: a deep, moderately well-drained silty clay loam soil formed in loess in Lancaster County, Nebraska. It is a fine, smectitic, mesic Typic Argiudoll. The soil was sampled and standardized by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. This soil is formed on interfluve and hill slopes on uplands (slope ranging from 0 to 18%) and on treads and risers on stream terraces in river valleys.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Pahokee Peat&lt;/strong&gt;: a standardized peat soil purchased from the IHSS. It is an agricultural soil of the Florida Everglades obtained from the University of Florida Belle Glade Research Station. This is a poorly drained soil formed by organic deposits from freshwater marshes accumulating over limestone bedrock.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Okefenokee Peat&lt;/strong&gt;: a peat from the largest blackwater swamp in North America. This is a highly acidic (pH 3 to 4) low-nutrient environment (Murray &amp;amp; Hodson, 1984). Its Spodosol soils are formed by the deposits of muck and peat mixed with fine salt and silt.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Dismal Swamp Peat&lt;/strong&gt;: a peat from a blackwater wetland in Virginia that has high iron loadings. Its hydric soils are formed under repeated saturation, long enough to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper horizons. The peat is formed by fast accumulation of carbon and slow decomposition yielding an organic-rich peat (Sleeter et al., 2017).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Oxidation experiments. &lt;/strong&gt;Oxidation of TOM samples was performed by suspending 2 g of dried material (105 °C for 12 h) in 10 mL of 1 M H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; (Fisher, 30%), with iron concentrations unperturbed from the native sample compositions (Table 1 of the associated publication, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c12913). Control experiments were done similarly but with ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm). Experiments were performed in acid-cleaned and pre-combusted 20 mL glass vials, which were kept open to the air to ensure constant aeration and steady gas release, avoiding pressure buildup. As the eight soil samples were largely insoluble in water, once the aqueous H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; was added to the soils, acid-cleaned and pre-combusted rods were used to break any formed clumps and homogeneously distribute the peroxide solution. The formed suspensions were let react for 48 h at room temperature in a dark fume hood (vials were covered with a large KimWipe). Then, the peroxide solution was evaporated for 12 h at 105 °C to retain the particulate and dissolved components and also to quench the oxidation reactions for obtaining samples at exact time points.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Considering that the oxidation had continued to occur during sample drying, the total oxidation is estimated to be 60 h (2.5 days) per time point. After drying, a sample was sacrificed, and the remaining samples were used for furtheroxidation by adding new 10 mL of 1 M H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; for another 2.5 days of oxidation. This is graphically explained in Figure S1 in the Supporting Information (SI) of the associated publication (DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c12913) &amp;nbsp;Thus, oxidation was subsequently performed in six cycles for a total oxidation time of 15 days. Section 1 of the SI of the associated publication at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c12913 includes more details on the oxidation protocol, justifications for the choices of experimental conditions, and results from ancillary control experiments (Figure S2 of the associated publication at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c12913) and milder oxidation studies with 0.1 M H2O2 (Figure S3 of the associated publication at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c12913). In summary, the in vitro experimental conditions were chosen to ensure that the TOM samples experience a strong oxidation gradient that will yield significant carbon losses (minimum of 66% and above 90%). This would allow for testing if the carbon isotopic composition, C/N ratios, and bulk organic structure become altered at significant carbon losses comparative to carbon losses characteristic for TOM export from land to estuaries and the open ocean (∼66%) and to deep sediments (above 95%).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Elemental and Isotopic Characterization&lt;/strong&gt;. Oxidized samples were homogenized and dried at 105 &lt;sup&gt;O&lt;/sup&gt;C prior to analysis. Elemental analysis as described below was performed to acquire total nitrogen (TN) content on unacidified samples. Then, samples were digested with 20% HCl to remove refractory carbonates such as siderite (Larson et al., 2008). The acid was removed by freeze-drying and the samples were ground into fine powders. They were then used for total organic carbon (TOC) and isotopic composition (δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C) analyses. &amp;nbsp;Sample preparation prior to TOC, TN, and δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C was done by wrapping weighed amounts of sample in tin capsules. Analysis was performed using a Thermo-Scientific Flash EA instrument (combustion at 1010 °C) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector and a Delta V Plus isotope-ratio mass spectrometer. The instrument's performance is validated daily by analysis of standards (mentioned below). TOC and TN values were obtained in triplicate (technical replicates), while δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C values were measured three times on the same sample (instrumental replicates) and averaged into a single measurement. TOC values were obtained after calibration with the isotopic standards below while TN values were obtained after calibration with nicotinamide and aspartic acid. Carbon and nitrogen peak integrations are done automatically by the instrument and peak areas are related to C or N amounts using calibration curves in Excel. δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C values determined by the isotope-ratio mass spectrometer and computed by its software were peak-size-corrected and scale-corrected (in Excel using calibration curves) using laboratory and authentic reference standards (glutamic acid: δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C = −13.90‰; USGS40: δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C = −26.39‰; USGS41a: δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C = +36.55‰; and tyrosine: δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C = −24.90‰). δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C results are reported in delta notation relative to that of Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite. C/N ratios were determined by the formula (TOC/1.00784)/(TN/12.011). Residual carbon amounts after the oxidation were determined by dividing the the mass of carbon in the oxidized sample divided by the mass of carbon in the control sample. Mass of carbon is determined by multiplying the mass of the sample by the corresponding TOC value.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This method yielded the&amp;nbsp;&quot;Residual carbon, %&quot;, &quot;Stable carbon isotopic signature (δ&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C)&quot;, and &quot;Carbon-to-nitrogen ratio&quot; reported in the dataset.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Structural Characterization by &lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C Solid-State NMR&lt;/strong&gt;. xidized samples were homogenized and dried at 105 OC prior to analysis. Samples were packed in a 4 mm zirconia (ZrO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;) rotor with a polychlorotrifluoroethylene (Kel-F) cap. Analysis was done on a 400 MHz (9.4 T) Bruker BioSpin AVANCE II spectrometer fitted with a 4 mm magic angle spinning probe at the College of Sciences Major Instrumentation Cluster (COSMIC) facility at Old Dominion University (Norfolk, VA). The instrument's performance is validated regularly by analysis of glycine, adamantane, and/or hexamethylbenzene. One-dimensional &lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;C NMR spectra were acquired using the nearly quantitative multipulse cross-polarization (multiCP) pulse program (Johnson &amp;amp; Schmidt-Rohr, 2014). Samples were spun at the magic angle at 14 kHz and analyzed using a relaxation delay of 1 s, 3000 scans, five cross-polarization segments, and a total contact time of 3.30 ms. The obtained spectra were phased, calibrated to an external glycine standard, and multiplied by an exponential window function (EM) of 200 Hz. Spectra were then baseline-corrected and integrated in the following ranges: 0−45 ppm (methyl and methylene); 45−60 ppm (αC in peptides); 60−95 (O-alkyl); 95−110 ppm (anomeric C), 110−145 ppm (aryl), 145−165 ppm (aryl-O), and 165−215 ppm (CO). All data were processed using the Bruker TopSpin 4.0.7 software.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This method yielded the NMR spectra reported in the manuscript.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; Specified by the Principal Investigator(s) &lt;p&gt;Data processing is described in the associated publication. This includes development of an isotopic mixing model, which we describe in the main text and the supplement (see related publications). The manuscript files are open-source and are available in this submission. We also include the MATLAB codes that were used to model the data and generate the publication figures.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; Specified by the Principal Investigator(s) - added locations and notes to dataset - Removed &quot;%&quot; character from Residual carbon, % column to allow numeric typing - Converted Collection_Lat from degrees-minutes-seconds (with N/S directional) to decimal degrees - Converted Collection_Lon from degrees-minutes-seconds (with E/W directional) to decimal degrees - Rounded Collection_Lon to 6 decimal places with trailing zeros preserved - Renamed fields to database-friendly names: Concentration of H2O2, M to Concentration_H2O2_M, Oxidation time point to Oxidation_time_point, Time of oxidation, days to Time_oxidation_days, Residual carbon, % to Residual_carbon_pct, Stable carbon isotopic signature (δ13C) to delta13C, Carbon-to-nitrogen ratio to CN_ratio, General location to General_location - Renamed table from bco-dmo_dataset_for_goranov_et_al._2025_est-1 to 999251_v1_oxidation Specified by BCO-DMO Data Managers asNeeded 7.x-1.1 Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO) Unavailable 508-289-2009 WHOI MS#36 Woods Hole MA 02543 USA info@bco-dmo.org http://www.bco-dmo.org Monday - Friday 8:00am - 5:00pm For questions regarding this resource, please contact BCO-DMO via the email address provided. pointOfContact Thermo Scientific Delta V Plus isotope-ratio mass spectrometer Thermo Scientific Delta V Plus isotope-ratio mass spectrometer PI Supplied Instrument Name: Thermo Scientific Delta V Plus isotope-ratio mass spectrometer Instrument Name: Thermo Fisher Scientific DELTA V Advantage isotope ratio mass spectrometer Instrument Short Name:Delta V Advantage Instrument Description: The Thermo Scientific DELTA V Advantage is an isotope ratio mass spectrometer designed to measure isotopic, elemental, and molecular ratios of organic and inorganic compounds. The DELTA V Advantage is the standard model of the DELTA V series of isotope ratio mass spectrometers, which can be upgraded to the DELTA V Plus. The DELTA V Advantage can be operated in Continuous Flow or Dual Inlet mode. The standard collector configuration is the Universal Triple Collector. H2 collectors with online hydrogen capability are optional. The DELTA V Advantage is controlled by an automated, integrated Isodat software suite. A magnet, whose pole faces determine the free flight space for the ions, eliminates the traditional flight tube. The magnet is designed for fast mass switching which is further supported by a fast jump control between consecutive measurements of multiple gases within one run. The sample gas is introduced at ground potential, eliminating the need for insulation of the flow path, ensuring 100 percent transfer into the ion source. The amplifiers register ion beams up to 50 V. The DELTA V Advantage has a sensitivity of 1200 molecules per ion (M/I) in Dual Inlet mode and 1500 M/I in Continuous Flow mode. It has a system stability of < 10 ppm and an effective magnetic detection radius of 191 nm. It has a mass range of 1 - 80 Dalton at 3 kV. Thermo Scientific Flash EA elemental analyzer Thermo Scientific Flash EA elemental analyzer PI Supplied Instrument Name: Thermo Scientific Flash EA elemental analyzer Instrument Name: Thermo Fisher Scientific Flash EA 1112 elemental analyzer Instrument Short Name:Flash EA 1112 Instrument Description: The Thermo Finnigan {Thermo Fisher Scientific} Flash EA 1112 elemental analyzer is a laboratory instrument used to determine total carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, sulphur, and oxygen in a sample. The sample is completely and instantaneously oxidised by flash combustion, which converts all organic and inorganic substances into combustion products. The resulting combustion gases pass through a reduction furnace and are swept into the chromatographic column by the helium carrier gas. The gases are separated in the column and detected by the thermal conductivity detector, which gives an output signal proportional to the concentration of the individual components of the mixture. The instrument was originally manufactured by Thermo Finnigan, which was acquired by Thermo Electron and later Thermo Scientific (part of Thermo Fisher Scientific).