Dataset: Zostera marina whole genome resequencing

To analyse genetic loci present throughout the global distribution range of eelgrass, we focused on identifying core genes that are present in genomes of all individuals. To do so, each of the 190 ramets were de novo assembled using HipMer (k = 51). To categorize, extract and compare core and variable (shell and cloud) genes, primary transcript sequences (21,483 gene models) from the Z. marina reference (V3.1; ref. 19) were aligned using BLAT using default parameters to each de novo assembly. Genes were considered present if the transcript aligned with either (1) >60% identity and >60% coverage from a single alignment or (2) >85% identity and >85% coverage split across three or fewer scaffolds. Individual presence–absence-variation calls were combined into a matrix to classify genes into core, cloud and shell categories based on their observation across the population.

The total number of genes considered was 20,100. Because identical genotypes and fragmented, low-quality assemblies can bias and skew presence–absence-variation analyses, only 141 single representatives of clones and ramets with greater than 17,500 genes were kept to ensure that only unique, high-quality assemblies were retained. Genes were classified using discriminant analysis of principal components into cloud, shell and core gene clusters based on their frequency. Core genes were the largest category, with 18,717 genes that were on average observed in 97% of ramets.

SNP mapping, calling and filtering The quality-filtered reads were mapped against the chromosome-level Z. marina reference genome V3.1 using BWA MEM62. The alignments were converted to BAM format and sorted using Samtools. The Mark- Duplicates module in GATK4 was used to identify and tag duplicate reads in the BAM files. The mapping rate for each genotype was calculated using Samtools (Supplementary Data Table 2 of Yu et al. 2023). HaplotypeCaller (GATK4) was used to generate a Genomic Variant Call Format (GVCF) file for each sample, and all the GVCF files were combined by CombineGVCFs (GATK4). GenotypeGVCFs (GATK4) was used to call genetic variants. BCFtools64 was used to remove SNPs within 20 base pairs of an indel or other variant type, as these variant types may cause erroneous SNPs calls. VariantsToTable (GATK4) was used to extract INFO annotations. SNPs meeting one or more than one of the following criteria were marked by VariantFiltration (GATK4): MQ < 40.0; FS > 60.0; QD < 10.0; MQRandSum > 2.5 or MQRandSum < −2.5; Read- PosRandSum < −2.5; ReadPosRandSum > 2.5; SOR > 3.0; DP > 10,804.0 (2 × average DP). Those SNPs were excluded by SelectVariants (GATK4). A total of 3,975,407 SNPs were retained. VCFtools65 was used to convert individual genotypes to missing data when GQ < 30 or DP < 10. Individual homozygous reference calls with one or more reads supporting the variant allele, and individual homozygous variant calls with ≥1 read supporting the reference, were set as missing data. Only bi-allelic SNPs were kept (3,892,668 SNPs). To avoid the reference-genome-related biases, due to the large Pacific–Atlantic genomic divergence, we focused on the 18,717 core genes that were on average observed in 97% of ramets. Bedtools66 was used to find overlap between the SNPs and the core genes, and only those SNPs were kept (ZM_HQ_SNPs, 763,580 SNPs). Genotypes that were outside our custom quality criteria were represented as missing data.

Possible parent-descendant pairs under selfing as well as clonemates were detected based on the shared heterozygosity. To ensure that all genotypes assessed originated by random mating, ten ramets showing evidence for selfing were excluded. Seventeen multiple sampled clonemates were also excluded. After the exclusion of 37 samples owing to missing data, selfing, or clonality, 153 samples were left for further analyses.

The chloroplast genome was de novo assembled by NOVOPlasty. The chloroplast genome of Z. marina was represented by a circular molecule of 143,968 bp with a classic quadripartite structure: two identical inverted repeats (IRa and IRb) of 24,127 bp each, a large single-copy region of 83,312 bp, and a small single-copy region of 12,402 bp. All regions were equally taken into SNP calling analysis except for 9,818 bp encoding 23S and 16S ribosomal RNAs due to bacterial contamination in some samples. The raw Illumina reads of each individual were aligned by BWA MEM to the assembled chloroplast genome. The alignments were converted to BAM format and then sorted using Samtools. Genomic sites were called as variable positions when the frequency of variant reads was >50% and the total coverage of the position was >30% of the median coverage (174 variable positions). Then 11 positions likely related to microsatellites and 12 positions reflecting minute inversions caused by hairpin structures were removed from the final set of variable positions for the haplotype reconstruction (151 SNPs). For the phylogenetic tree reconstruction, we further selected 108 SNPs that represent parsimony-informative sites (that is, no singletons).