Dataset: Ingestion - Copepod Foraging in Marine Snow Layer Experiments 2020

During the autumn of 2020, four experiments were conducted in which copepods of the species Calanus pacificus were exposed to four different feeding environments (treatments). These four treatments were: a tank with a marine snow layer, a tank with a homogenous distribution of marine snow, and two control treatments without food – one with a density gradient and one with no density gradient. Copepods were recorded with two cameras, allowing us to reconstruct 2D and 3D copepod tracks. From these tracks, we determined vertical distributions of copepods and quantified behavioral properties, including swimming velocity, a measure of path linearity, and jump frequency. We also measured copepod ingestion in the four treatments using gut pigment analysis.

C. pacificus was collected using a small boat near Scripps Canyon in La Jolla, CA (32° 51.720’ N, 117° 16.816’ W) 11-22 days before each experiment with a 333 µm mesh plankton net (0.5 m diameter mouth). Samples were sorted in the lab to isolate individuals of the species C. pacificus. Copepods were maintained with regular water changes in an incubator in the dark at 18°C until the experiment and fed Thalassiosira weissflogii . Twenty-four hours prior to each experiment, a total of 120 copepods were starved (30 copepods for each treatment). The copepods for each treatment were placed in separate 100 mL beakers filled with filtered seawater and stored in complete darkness at room temperature (~21 ˚C) until just prior to the experiment. For each treatment, the copepods were starved in filtered seawater with a density equal to that of the top layer fluid for that treatment, which differed between treatments because of how each feeding environment was created. This allowed for the copepods to be acclimated to the density of the top layer fluid in their assigned treatment tank to limit any shock or behavioral reaction at the beginning of the experiment.

Sixteen days prior to each experiment, four identical cultures of T. weissflogii were started with a concentration of 10,000 cells/mL in 1.8 L of f/2 media (two each for the layer treatment and the homogenous treatment). These cultures were kept on a 12:12 hour light:dark cycle at room temperature and phytoplankton concentration was measured every other day with a particle counter (Beckman Coulter). The phytoplankton cultures were grown for a total of thirteen days, corresponding to roughly the middle of their exponential growth phase.

After the phytoplankton cultures grew for thirteen days, and three days prior to the experiment, each T. weissflogii culture was diluted to 32,500 cells/mL and transferred into a cylindrical acrylic tank with a volume of 2.2 L and circumference of 51 cm. The cylindrical tanks used to form aggregates designated for the layer treatment were filled with seawater with density equal to the top layer fluid for that treatment. The tanks used to form aggregates designated for the homogenous treatment were filled with seawater that had a density ~0.0020 g/cm3 less (i.e. a salinity of ~1.3 psu less) than the fluid for that treatment; this was done to allow for slower aggregate settling speeds in that treatment, based on observations in preliminary experiments. The cylindrical tanks were placed on a roller table and were allowed to rotate at a speed of 4.3 RPM for 3 days in the dark to form aggregates.

A single experiment consisted of a set of four different treatments. These treatments were done one after the other, in the following order: control with gradient, layer, homogenous, and control with no gradient. The four treatments were all created in a rectangular acrylic tank of dimensions 10 cm x 10 cm x 50 cm. In each treatment, 25 copepods were allowed to feed in the tank for between 4-8 minutes.

The control with gradient treatment and the layer treatment required the formation of a density gradient. This density gradient allowed for the formation of an ephemeral marine snow layer (lasting about 8 minutes) in the layer treatment. An identical density gradient was created in the control with gradient treatment so we could account for any potential changes in copepod behavior in response to the change in density. Filtered seawater was used for the bottom layer fluid, which had a density between 1.0233-1.0236 g/cm3 (salinity between 33.6-34.0 psu) at room temperature, ~21 ˚C. Filtered seawater was diluted with DI water to a target density of 0.0040 g/cm3 less (or salinity of 5.3 psu less) than the bottom layer fluid to create the top layer fluid. To form the density gradient, we filled the tank with bottom layer fluid to ~25 cm from the bottom of the tank (approximate halfway mark). In order to get rid of any bubbles adhering to the sides of the tank, which might obstruct a clear camera view, we ran a sponge along the inside tank walls. Then, top layer fluid was carefully poured on top of the bottom layer fluid through a diffuser made from a sponge that had been soaked in top layer fluid. This diffuser floats at the surface of the water column and prevents mixing at the density interface as the less dense top layer fluid is added to the tank slowly with a pump (Micropump Model GB-P23.JVS.A.B1). The homogenous treatment and the control with no density gradient treatment did not require a density gradient, and instead were filled entirely with undiluted filtered seawater (i.e., bottom layer fluid from the other treatments).

Just prior to starting each treatment, the starved copepods that were set aside for each treatment were transferred from their 100 mL beakers into 10 mL beakers. This made it possible to pour the entire beaker into a ladle which was used to transfer the copepods into the tank. For treatments that required marine snow aggregates (the layer treatment and the homogenous treatment), the cylindrical tank containing aggregates was carefully taken off the roller table and placed upright so that the aggregates slowly settled to the bottom of the tank. The marine snow aggregates were then carefully transferred into a small glass vial, so as not to break up the fragile aggregates, such that the total volume of aggregates in the vial was equal to roughly 5 mL.

Once the tank was set up, the copepods and aggregates were added accordingly, based on the treatment. For both control treatments, the copepods were placed into the tank by transferring them with a ladle, which was gently placed at the surface of the water and tilted so the copepods were released into the tank. For the layer treatment, the aggregates were pipetted into the tank just below the surface, such that they had a relatively even horizontal distribution. The copepods were ladled into the tank once a distinct marine snow layer had formed. For the homogenous treatment, about half of the aggregates were pipetted just below the surface into the tank, again such that the distribution of aggregates horizontally was fairly homogenous. Then all 25 copepods were ladled into the tank, with the remaining aggregates added afterwards. This method created a roughly homogenous distribution of aggregates sinking around the copepods throughout the time of camera recording.

The experimental tank was set up on a table and was lit from below with a near-infrared light-emitting diode (LED) aimed upwards through a Fresnel lens through a cut-out in the table with an overlying piece of clear plexiglass. Two near-infrared sensitive cameras (Point Grey Grasshopper Camera Model GS3-U3-41C6NIR-C) were set up at 90˚ angles facing two neighboring sides of the tank. During the experiments, the cameras recorded at 12 frames per second. The recording started immediately prior to adding the marine snow aggregates to the tanks (or the copepods in the case of the control treatments). For the two control treatments, the recording was stopped once the copepods had been in the tank for approximately 8 minutes. For the layer treatment, the recording was stopped once the aggregates started falling out of the layer. For the homogenous treatment, the recording was stopped once the aggregates started sinking out of the bottom of the field of view to limit the amount of time that the animals may be feeding on aggregates sitting on the bottom of the tank. The images had a field of view of ~30 cm x 10 cm. This field of view is vertically centered, so that it is ~10 cm from the bottom of the tank and ~10 cm from the top of the tank. The density gradient, which is located ~25 cm from the bottom of the tank, is located at roughly the halfway mark in the field of view (~15 cm from both the bottom and top of field of view).

Once copepod behavior had been recorded, the cameras were turned off and the copepods were carefully siphoned out of the tank onto a 100 µm mesh sieve. All the water from the tank was saved in a bucket for filtering after the experiments. Copepods were then collected for gut pigment analysis. After the copepods were removed from each treatment tank, using both cameras we recorded images of a ruler aligned vertically in the center of the tank, which were used for image calibration.

After the copepods were siphoned out of the tank and onto the sieve, pairs of copepods were added to amber vials filled with 3mL of 90% acetone (10 per treatment), recovering 20 of the copepods in each treatment. Copepods in each vial were sonicated at 40% amplitude for 5 seconds to break up the organisms and release gut content into the acetone. The amber vials were then placed in a -20˚C freezer overnight. The water of each treatment tank was also filtered and analyzed for chlorophyll concentration. Prior to filtering, the water from each tank was well mixed, and then three subsamples of 25 mL each were filtered onto a GF/F filter. These filters were then placed in amber vials filled with 5 mL of 90% acetone to extract the chlorophyll into solution and the vials were placed into a -20˚C freezer overnight. The following day, the copepod gut and tank water samples were analyzed using a fluorometer (Trilogy, Turner Designs) to measure the concentration of chlorophyll and pheophytin in the acetone solution.

This data set includes the copepod gut pigment and tank water pigment data from these experiments. For the copepod track data from the same experiments collected from the cameras, see related dataset https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/880645.