{"@context":{"content":"http:\/\/purl.org\/rss\/1.0\/modules\/content\/","dc":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/","foaf":"http:\/\/xmlns.com\/foaf\/0.1\/","og":"http:\/\/ogp.me\/ns#","rdfs":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/01\/rdf-schema#","sioc":"http:\/\/rdfs.org\/sioc\/ns#","sioct":"http:\/\/rdfs.org\/sioc\/types#","skos":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2004\/02\/skos\/core#","xsd":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2001\/XMLSchema#","owl":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2002\/07\/owl#","rdf":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/02\/22-rdf-syntax-ns#","rss":"http:\/\/purl.org\/rss\/1.0\/","site":"https:\/\/www.bco-dmo.org\/ns#","odo":"http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/","emo":"http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/entity-matching#","bibo":"http:\/\/purl.org\/ontology\/bibo\/","crypto":"http:\/\/id.loc.gov\/vocabulary\/preservation\/cryptographicHashFunctions\/","bcodmo":"http:\/\/lod.bco-dmo.org\/id\/","tw":"http:\/\/tw.rpi.edu\/schema\/","dcat":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/dcat#","time":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2006\/time#","geo":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2003\/01\/geo\/wgs84_pos#","geosparql":"http:\/\/www.opengis.net\/ont\/geosparql#","sf":"http:\/\/www.opengis.net\/ont\/sf#","void":"http:\/\/rdfs.org\/ns\/void#","sd":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/sparql-service-description#","dctype":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/dcmitype\/","prov":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/prov#","schema":"http:\/\/schema.org\/","geolink":"http:\/\/schema.geolink.org\/1.0\/base\/main#","spdx":"http:\/\/spdx.org\/rdf\/terms#","bcodmo_vocab":"http:\/\/schema.bco-dmo.org\/"},"@id":"http:\/\/lod.bco-dmo.org\/id\/dataset\/753232#graph","@graph":[{"http:\/\/lod.bco-dmo.org\/id\/dataset\/753232":{"@id":"http:\/\/lod.bco-dmo.org\/id\/dataset\/753232","@type":["http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/DeploymentDatasetCollection","http:\/\/www.w3.org\/ns\/dcat#Dataset","http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/Dataset"],"http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/hasAcquisitionDescription":[{"@value":"
Mesocosm setup and sampling:<\/p>\n
Samples were collected from mesocosm experiments conducted from 13 May through 30 May 2017 at the National Mesocosm Facility located at the Espeland Marine Biological Station at the Raune-fjord (60o22.1\u2019N, 5o28.1\u2019E), University of Bergen, Norway. Six polyethylene enclosures measuring 2 m diameter, 8 m deep, hereafter referred to as mesocosms, were moored to a raft approx. 200 m from shore. During assembly, approximately 20,000 L of unfiltered fjord seawater was enclosed in each mesocosm and monitored for 17d. Three of the six mesocosms were amended on two consecutive days with pulses of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus in Redfield ratio proportions in order to induce a phytoplankton bloom (total additions: 4 mM nitrate, 0.25 mM phosphate; hereafter referred to as replete mesocosms). Mesocosms were bubbled with ambient air for two days after nutrient additions to facilitate mixing. Mesocosms were monitored daily and average temperature fluctuations at 1 m depth ranged from 10 to 11 oC.<\/p>\n
2-heptyl-4-quinolone (HHQ) addition experiments:<\/p>\n
Water obtained from replete mesocosms was spiked with 2-heptyl-4-quinolone (HHQ) or solvent vehicle controls every two days over a 15 d period to examine the effects of HHQ on microbial abundance and community structure over the course of an induced phytoplankton bloom. A 5 L Niskin bottle was used to collect mesocosm water from 1 m depth before passage through a 200 mm mesh filter to remove larger zooplankton. Equal volumes were collected from the triplicate replete mesocosms, pooled into 20 L carboys, and transported immediately to a 10 oC cold room for further processing. The water collected was dispersed among nine, 4.7 L polycarbonate bottles that had been acid-washed and rinsed in 18.2 mW water (Millipore Milli-Q). Triplicate bottles representing time zero controls were immediately processed for determination of chlorophyll a concentration, cell enumeration, and nucleic acid acquisition (details below). The remaining bottles were amended in triplicate with either 410 nM (100 ng mL-1) HHQ dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or an equal concentration (0.1% v:v) of DMSO to serve as a solvent vehicle control. These six bottles were mixed well before incubation for 24 hr in a land-based mesocosm containing flow-through surface seawater matching in situ temperatures. Window screen shading was used to replicate light levels (7,500 lux) corresponding to a depth of 1 m in the fjord-based mesocosms. The total time between subsampling the mesocosms and incubating the bottles was kept under 1 hr. After 24 hr, the bottles were processed in a 10 oC cold room for determination of chlorophyll a concentration, cell enumeration, and for some experiments, nucleic acid acquisition as described below.<\/p>\n
Biomass collection and DNA isolation:<\/p>\n
Triplicate microbial biomass samples from the HHQ addition experiments were taken at T0 directly from the pooled mesocosm sample and at T24 after 24 hr exposure to either 410 nM HHQ or a DMSO (0.1 % v:v) solvent vehicle control. In a 10 oC cold room, microbial biomass was harvested by passing between 0.8 and 2 L of sample through a 1 \u00b5m polycarbonate filter followed by a 0.2 \u00b5m polycarbonate filter via serial filtration. The microbial communities collected on these filters are referred to throughout as particle-associated (1 - 200 \u00b5m fraction) and free-living (0.2 - 1 \u00b5m fraction) communities. A peristaltic pump system fitted with silicon tubing and filter holders was flushed with 18.2 mW water (Millipore Milli-Q) between samples to prevent sample carry-over. Each sample was filtered in less than 30 min, and immediately after filtration, filters were placed in cryovials, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 oC until DNA isolation.<\/p>\n
DNA was isolated from 1 \u00b5m and 0.2 \u00b5m polycarbonate filters using an established protocol (Urakawa et al, 2010)\u00a0with recent modifications (Biller et al, 2018), including steps to remove RNA contamination. Briefly,\u00a0 polycarbonate filters were thawed on ice and placed in lysing matrix E tubes containing 400 \u00b5l of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, pH 8.0) and 400 \u00b5l of 2X TENS Buffer (100 mM Tris-hydrochloric acid at pH 8.0, 40 mM Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 200 mM Sodium chloride, 2% Sodium dodecyl sulfate), agitated for 10 min using a horizontal vortex adapter, and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 6 min. The aqueous phase was carefully transferred to Phase Lock Gel (PLG) tubes (Quanta Bio) containing 375 \u00b5l chloroform, mixed via gentle inversion, and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 6 min. The supernatant was transferred to a sterile microcentrifuge tube and incubated with 0.5 \u00b5l of RNase A (100 mg\/ml; Qiagen) at 37 oC for 30 min after mixing by gentle inversion. After RNase treatment, samples were transferred to a new PLG tube containing 300 \u00b5l of 7.5 M ammonium acetate and mixed by gentle inversion before the addition of 700 \u00b5l of chloroform and additional mixing by inversion. These tubes were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 6 min and the supernatant was transferred to a sterile microcentrifuge tube in which DNA was recovered by alcohol precipitation using 360 \u00b5l of ice-cold isopropanol containing 2 \u00b5l of linear acrylamide (5 mg mL-1; AMRESCO). Samples were mixed thoroughly by repeated inversions before incubating on ice for 1 hr.\u00a0 DNA pellets were formed by centrifugation (14,800 rpm for 15 min at 4 oC), at which point the isopropanol was removed and the DNA pellet was washed with 500 \u00b5l of ice-cold 75% ethanol. DNA pellets were again formed (14,800 rpm for 8 min at 4 oC) before removing the ethanol by decanting and drying the pellets in a laminar flow hood for 2-5 min. Pellets were resuspended in 40 \u00b5l of nuclease free water and the total DNA yield was quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) with yields ranging from 0.2 - 4.5 \u00b5g total DNA.<\/p>\n
Amplicon library preparation and sequencing:<\/p>\n
In order to comprehensively examine how microbial community composition was impacted by HHQ over the course of the bloom, T0 DNA samples from all experiments, and T24 DNA samples from experiments 1, 3, 5, and 7 were chosen to prepare 16S and 18S rRNA gene amplicon libraries for sequencing. Libraries were prepared and sequenced by the Georgia Genomics and Bioinformatics Core at the University of Georgia. Libraries targeting the V4-V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene were constructed using the following primers: 515F (5\u2019-GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3\u2019) and 926R (5\u2019-CCGYCAATTYMTTTRAGTTT-3\u2019) to obtain longer amplicons, reduce biases against archaea and the SAR11 clade, and obtain eukaryotic plastid sequences (Walters et al, 2015; Parada et al, 2016). Libraries targeting the 18S rRNA gene were constructed using the following primers: Euk1391F (5\u2019-GTACACACCGCCCGTC-3\u2019) and EukBr (5\u2019-TGATCCTTCTGCAGGTTCACCTAC-3\u2019) to target microbial eukaryotic lineages (Amaral-Zettler, et al, 2009; Caporaso, et al, 2012). PCR amplification was performed following the protocols and standards recommended by the Earth Microbiome Project for preparation of 16S and 18S amplicons for Illumina sequencing (Caporaso, et al, 2012; earthmicrobiome.org) and libraries were prepared using procedures outlined in the Illumina 16S metagenomic sequencing library preparation guide (Illumina, 2018), using an input of 25 ng of DNA.\u00a0 Amplicon libraries were multiplexed in two sets of 72 and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform to produce 300+300 nt paired reads. After demultiplexing, three samples were found to contain anomalously low information (<300 reads each) and were removed from further analysis. Of the remaining samples, a median total of approx. 150K raw paired-end reads were obtained for each sample (range: approx. 14K \u2013 1.2 million due to variations in library loading).<\/p><\/div>","@type":"rdf:HTML"}],"http:\/\/ocean-data.org\/schema\/hasBriefDescription":[{"@value":"16S and 18S rRNA gene amplicon sequences","@language":"en-US"}],"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/terms\/description":[{"@value":"