Dataset: Prey and predator exposure results from light stress in phytoplankton and dinoflagellate grazing response experiments from August to September of 2018

ValidatedRelease Date:2020-03-17Final no updates expectedDOI: 10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.779050.1Version 1 (2019-10-15)Dataset Type:experimental

Principal Investigator: Suzanne Strom (University of Washington)

BCO-DMO Data Manager: Amber D. York (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)


Project: Environmental stress and signaling based on reactive oxygen species among planktonic protists (Protist signaling)


Abstract

Matrix data from light stress in phytoplankton and dinoflagellate grazing response experiments from August of 2016 to September of 2018. Both predators and prey were exposed to experimental irradiances and then tested in an array of combinations. These data were published in Strom et al. (2020).

Matrix data from light stress in phytoplankton and dinoflagellate grazing response experiments from August of 2016 to September of 2018.  Both predators and prey were exposed to experimental irradiances and then tested in an array of combinations. These data were published in Strom et al. (2020).

Related datasets also from light stress grazing experiments:
* Light stress grazing: photosynthetic efficiency https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/779033
* Light stress grazing: prey-only exposure https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/779043


Related Datasets

No Related Datasets

Related Publications

General

Gifford, DJ (1985) Laboratory culture of marine planktonic oligotrichs (Ciliophora, Oligotrichida). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 23:257-267. doi: 10.3354/meps023257
General

Menden-Deuer, S., & Lessard, E. J. (2000). Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton. Limnology and Oceanography, 45(3), 569–579. doi:10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0569
Methods

Strom, S., Barberi, O., Mazur, C., Bright, K., & Fredrickson, K. (2020). High light stress reduces dinoflagellate predation on phytoplankton through both direct and indirect responses. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 84, 43–57. doi:10.3354/ame01924